Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
NCLaker

Weighing your catch?

20 posts in this topic

What is the safest way to weigh a Muskie? I have a Berkley digital scale ... I assume, you would just hook it to the hoop of the net and weigh it while in the net. Then subtact the approx weight of the net.

Would hate to do this cause I wouldn't want to do any damage with it thrashing around in a net out of the water. Don't think I would weigh any catch unless it were a new PB or very large ski (e.g. 48+ maybe).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a pic of how a buddy in CA does it, good luck on the PB; Good fishing.

hrnet.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just clamp on that boca grip to the lower jaw and give her a lift. laugh

Only kidding. If you really wanted weight keeping her in the net is probably the best idea. I've certainly thought about the idea before but length and girth is really all I would like to deal with.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why do you want to weight it? Nobody cares first of all. Length is the quantifiable measurement for muskies in the fishing world.

Otherwise just get a calculator and a seamstresses tape and do some math.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've thought about weighing some fish to see how accurate the calculations area, but haven't yet. I'd say weighing a fish in a cradle would be the best for them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Aparrently he does. Not uncommon to want to know what your catch weighs. I go for length too but somettimes wonder

Why do you want to weight it? Nobody cares first of all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya -

I don't weigh or even girth fish (a rarely measure any even), because I just don't care personally, but if you're into it, a decent girth with a seamstress tape and some number crunching will get you very, very close.

The formula looks simple on the surface but the way in which the formula was created is pretty sophisticated. The main background calculations involve the volume of two cones, and the specific gravity of water - so it's a lot more than a SWAG calculation. There are a number of calculations for fish of different body types, most developed in the saltwater world by - I think - Stu Apte among others. For muskies the lxgxg/800 seems to be the most accurate. It differs for other species - lots of salmon/steelheaders use lxgxg/690...

At any rate - personally if I were to worry about weight, the formula would do for me. Hard to go too far wrong when it's an equation based on Euclidean geometry and the specific weight of water...

Cheers,

Rob Kimm

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why do you want to weight it? Nobody cares first of all. Length is the quantifiable measurement for muskies in the fishing world.

Otherwise just get a calculator and a seamstresses tape and do some math.

Thanks for your feedback Shawn. I guess I have seen various posts/comments on weight (so I think some do smile. I was assuming that doing a quick weight of a fish would be quicker, easier, and more accurate than wrapping a tape measure around it and trying to find the thickest part of the fish (btw what is the formula for calculating this?). Looking for the best method to figure weight that will have the least negative impact to the fish since everything I catch is CPR.

Again, not really interested in doing this on every catch, probably only personal bests (talking couple fish per year if I'm lucky smile. If I fished and caught as many fish as some do on this site, than probably wouldn't care as much. But since I don't, catching anything worthy is worth knowing this additional detail for my own personal info.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks RK. Why are their two "g"s in the calculation? Are they both girth?

Pretty new to muskie fishing so it is nice to know the info on PB's. I rarely do any sort of measurement (weight/length) of any other type of fish, cause I catch enought don't really care. But if I do catch something I think is PB than do try to try to get length, and weight if convinient.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi NCLaker -

Yeah - another way to say it would be LxG2/800. The girth squared is because the formula uses the volume of two cones...

They said there'd be no math in this job...

smile

Cheers,

Rob Kimm

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I do the same as RK and have the same thoughts as Shawn. I would never weigh a fish as it increases the risk of hurting that fish. People don't realize that it's not good for any species of fish. As the fish get bigger like a muskie, there is a greater risk to the survival of that fish. I use length and girth formula if I have the slightest interest in weight. Girth is measured while the fish is in the water, no harm in that. As far as weight goes for fish in general, not interested, so it's not just a muskie thing. Unless it's a for sure state record fish.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Netting any fish can cause fin damage, but suspending them out of water in a net has the potential to do more than if they are in the water. A cradle would be much better to use than a net.

Don't measure many any more, never girthed a muskie.

Just not really that big of a deal to me.

JS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree cradle would probably be the best if one wants to weigh one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you weigh them, how can you exaggerate then? grin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

LMAO Cooter!!!!!!

What would fishing be if it weren't for the lies....ahhhhhmmmmm, exaggerations????

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I catch "ish" fish...... 42ish or 46ish or 48ish by using a float stick when I'm curious. Most of the time I'm fairly close, sometimes a thick fish will be longer than I guessed so I'm underestimating instead of growing the fish into legendary status in my own mind!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I catch "ish" fish...... 42ish or 46ish or 48ish by using a float stick when I'm curious. Most of the time I'm fairly close, sometimes a thick fish will be longer than I guessed so I'm underestimating instead of growing the fish into legendary status in my own mind!

I can vouch for this, he got one last week that he thought was mid to low 40's...turned out to be a fat 48 incher! When a 12-13 inch long bait looks small, it's a big fish dude! grin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, all a scale is gonna do is turn you into a lier!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think JD is getting all the L&G = what weight so we'll have a chart someday for those that care how much they tip the scale; for me I could care less especially after touching the Crooms Massiff, anything else will be below the benchmark.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great stuff guys! Thanks for all your entertaining insight.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Human nature. Especially when one is emotionally invested in elections.   I haven't commented too much on this Russian stuff. Could be true. Could be all just many upset about the election results.    At the very least, Trump may be just getting a taste of his own medicine(the claim he had evidence BHO was not a citizen, the National Enquirer stories about Cruz)
    • Did "YOU" and the "WIFE" enjoy growing up in the cities?  Me personally I grew up in a farm town in southern MN and have lived in Shakopee for the past 25 years.  I absolutely cannot stand living in the cities.  Everything is amped up 500%.  Driving is nuts. Traffic is nuts.  Ever ride your bike down Minnehaha falls on the weekend?  Kids sports is outrageous.  In general if you want to fish, sled, atv, your driving up north...with everyone else on a Friday night.  Unless you get lucky as heck most neighbors are either phony as heck or you never see them.  Seems as though most folks never leave the house.  Unless you have lots of space/land you will have neighborhoods doing fireworks whenever, dogs barking, snowblowing at 10:00PM etc...  Kids rarely go out and play in the cities.  I've discovered that they are constantly being shuttled to event after event, so the notion that the kids on the street will play together is few and far between.  The schools, at least in Shakopee have been great from an educational standpoint!  However because they shift classes and actual schools every few years, my girls have never had the same classmates.  In the town I grew up in we only had 120 kids in the class, so you pretty much knew every kid.  Bussing can be quite limited when your kid wants to do afterschool activities and sports.  Talk about income inequality...in my hometown the farmer was generally the "rich guy" but you never really knew it.  In the cities you definitely know who the rich folks are and boy does it bring out the competition in folks.  And I'm not talking CEO's and big wigs, I'm talking 2 professionals pulling down 6 figures each.    That's the other thing most people skim over when talking about the greatness of the metro.  Sure if you can afford $125 tickets for the wild game, or $85 tickets for a play, or "shopping" as your activity it IS a great place.  But if your not willing to pony up the money for those events it can be a little boring.  That's why I enjoy Shakopee in that I can head down to the river and take a nice long walk in peace and quiet.  Especially in the winter!   Maybe because I'm getting older and older but this notion that life is all about money, money, money seems less and less important.  Granted I understand you have to make a living and provide for your family, which is why I deal with it, but ultimately you have decide what your family wants out of life.  That is why I am encouraging my kids to seek a life away from the big metro area.  Especially since they enjoy being outside so much.  Full disclose we bought a small cabin last year as our way to "deal with it".  Now I have a place to go to get away AND in 6 years when my youngest graduates high school I will be out of here...  Good luck!!!!
    • True, but we have liberal corporate run media and the fact you are seemingly blind to that fact shows your bias.     
    • my old house was a 6.5 x 12' (No V front) with an outside 2x4' in front for bathroom.   I really didn't notice any difference in towing it.  I know a guy who had his house built with about 2' wide V in front which opens the entire area up quite a bit and he wishes now he would have went 3' wide.  And this still gives you plenty of space on the V to put your LP tanks.     Wish I would have done that on my new 8x16'.   The little gas the V front may save you, to me is not worth the value of that extra space.    
    • I thought there was no point?
    • The US doesn't have state controlled media at all. Well, didn't have. Now we have Bannon and Breitbart in the White House, and of course at Trump's press conference there was only a single reserved seat: front and center for Breitbart.   As far as psychological manipulation: you are subjected to it daily, but usually for commercial purposes. You can easily go the whole day without seeing anything politics related, but good look avoiding advertising for a day.
    • Worst buy I ever bought. I sold it the next week. I like 13 products but not this line of products
  • Our Sponsors