Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Meyer8043

Decent Starter Camera

11 posts in this topic

Never have done any photography besides with a point and shoot camera. Looking to broaden my horizons and try something a little more technical. I would use the camera for mostly outdoor pictures so i'm wondering what kind of camera and lens would be a good one to start with. Looking to spend around $700. I looked at some in the classifieds in here but most of it was greek to me so any suggestions from a avid photographer would be greatly appreciated! Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am sure that you have seen my camera for sale in the photography ads and that was my first digital SLR. You are going to find that the real money is going to be the glass that can reach wildlife at a distance and not so much with the body. When I choose the 30D it was because the build quality was better then a 20D or the XT line. That being said both of those cameras take great pictures but the 30D had a magnesium body and not a plastic body and the shutter was rated for 100,000 shots VS 50,000. I have not mentioned the amount of pixels cause for the most part it really dose not make a difference for most of the shots that you will print. I have a 100-400 L lens and if I had the money I would own longer glass and until I win the lottery that ain't happening anytime soon but you will want a lens with at least 200mm of reach. The 400mm 5.6 prime from Canon is around $1200 and the 100-400 is around $1500 and the 500mm F4 is $5900 just to give you a idea what type of money you are looking at. You will want to get a case and a monopod or a tripod at some point and time. Hope this helps and gives you a idea on the cost. It may seem expensive to start this hobby but the overall satisfaction with getting some cool shots will more then make up for the cost and I don't ever remember having a bad day when I have been out shooting. Look up POTN and they will have a pretty active buy and sell section if you want to get a idea on what the prices are on used gear. Post pictures and ask questions and you will get all sorts of help for all your questions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Something else that may help you if you decide to go with a used body so you will have more money for glass and you want to know the specs on a certain camera is to go to B&H or Adorama and look at there used section and you will get all the specs. This can help if you want to know how many megapixel or if it has a built in flash and things along that line.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Meyer, indeed the possibilities are endless. We don't really know what specifically you'd like to take outdoors pictures, so if you could tell us more about what kinds of things you'd like to photograph, we can narrow our advice a bit. This is particularly important for lens selection, less so for body recommendations.

I'll give some general advice. I also recommend a used body and glass. There are tons of excellent lightly used camera bodies and lenses out there, and a couple reliable clearinghouses of used gear that are reliable include POTN and Fred Miranda. I've bought and sold thousands of dollars in gear through POTN with not a single dud.

Now, jmalm and I and most who shoot DSLRs on this board are Canon users. There are some Nikon shooters as well, and a couple Sony shooters. Reason I say this is I'll give you Canon advice because that's the brand I know best.

For $700, even buying a used body and lens, you're not going to get tip-top glass, but for your purposes that may not matter at all.

I'd recommend a used 30D or 40D. If you opt for a 40D, your $700 is already eaten up, although you should be able to find a great conditions lightly used 30D for around $400. I'd say put the Canon 55-250 zoom on it and you'll have what you need for all-around shooting for about $700. The body is 8 Mp, and one I continue to use mnost often in my business, and I have made prints to 20x30 with those images that are gorgeous. Don't get caught up in the megapixel madness, which has a lot to do with marketing and not with the actual needs of photographers. Don't get me wrong. Having more pixels can be nice in a couple ways, but it's not core. The 30D is now two generations old (there's a 50D now), and it's in the intermediate Canon line between entry level and so-called true pro gear. Some call it a pro-sumer line. Anyway, the xxD series cameras are a bit larger (helpful because I have larger hands), have a better build quality and more features than their entry level contemporaries.

You'll need a CF memory card (luckily memory is cheap these days) and preferably an extra battery. The 30D comes with a pop-up flash, and you can wait with a tripod or monopod to see how much work you do and whether you'll need them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Like Steve and Jim said, going used is really the best way in the current photography market. Right now out of everything in my bag, only three pieces of equipment were bought new. I got a great deal on a body from Steve almost a year ago now and I am very thankful for that.

XTi, XS, XSi, and T1i are all great entry level cameras. I think live view was incorporated on the XS and video on the XSi (could have been XSi and T1i) and for someone who is used to shooting point and shoots, live view makes the transition a little easier. These cameras as stated are more along the entry level lines and really the most noticeable deficiency is the autofocus capabilities. They work good, but for bird in flight kind of stuff you may want to step up a bit.

As Steve and Jim said, the 30D or 40D are very nice cameras. You get a lot better features as they already said. The autofocus system is more advanced and the build is a bit more rugged.

Another good lens to go with whatever camera you choose (if you choose canon) would be the EF 75-300 IS if you cant find the EF-s 55-250 IS. On the used market you shouldn't have to dish out more than 350 for the lens and it is pretty good. Obviously not L quality, but not L pricing either. If you want to shoot landscapes and don't want to spend a bundle the EF-s 18-55 IS will get you started. You can find that lens for about 100-150 on the used market.

I have considered selling my XT/grip that I bought from Steve to fund an upgrade to a 30D myself. I just sold a piece of ice fishing equipment to fund the purchase of an oldy but goody Canon 20-35 f2.8L lens. No USM focus, but in the couple of quick tests I did last night, I found it to be an awesome lens. The thing was like brand new and I got a deal on it. Searching for used gear is a lot of fun, but when you find something you want you need to act quick cause the deals don't last too long.

Oh yeah, one other thing to mention about the Used market, if you buy used lenses, you can pretty much rest assured that you are renting a lens for free if you decide to sell it in the future. Lenses at Used prices tend to stay at the same level or in some cases actually appreciate in value. Bodies tend to go down in value quicker than lenses, but if you are buying two generations back to begin with, you can accomplish pretty much the same deal. You could buy a 30D and a couple of lenses, use them for a year and if it isn't for you, sell them for maybe 50 bucks lost. Point and shoots don't do that!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let me throw in my 2 cents. Let me start off by saying that I am by no means an expert...and I agree with what has already been posted.

I was much like you a few months ago....wanting to get more into photography with just a point and shoot background. I got lucky and my wife surprised me with a Canon XSI for my birthday. The XSI is an entry level DSLR from Canon's rebel series...and I could not be more happy with its performance.

I would agree with other posters and say that the "glass" or lenses are probably where you should focus more of your investment. This hobby can become very addictive and I have already purchased a few lenses from the B&H HSOforum. The nice thing about most on-line stores like the one mentioned above is the fact that they allow people to "review" their purchases....so you get a chance to hear what others have said about the camera bodies/lenses..both good and bad.

Good luck in your search and I know you will have a blast with your new equipment.

Cliffy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:
I just sold a piece of ice fishing equipment to fund the purchase of an oldy but goody Canon 20-35 f2.8L lens.

I'd love to see a comparison between the older Canon wide 2.8 zooms! The 17-35,20-35, I bought a 16-35II but want one of the older ones for a specialized rig that is gonna see some really bad abuse.

Please do some kind of mini review about that 20-35! I'd love to hear about it!

Sorry for hi-jack!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MM... I will do something like that. I have rented the 17-35, 16-35, 17-40, and now own the 20-35. I will do a little write up here when I get a chance to do so. First impressions, not quite as sharp as the newer lenses at a focus point greater than 10 feet, but still perfectly acceptable. Closer up, it is pretty stellar. I will do a series of shots with my current line up on both bodies and compare the results at different focal lengths and focus distances. I want to find the sweet spot anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a look at the Olympus E-620 two lens kit. It's in your price range. Oly is kind of the black sheep of the DSLR world. The only people that like them are the people that own them. Olympus offers the best kit lenses and dust reduction system on the market. In fact, dust is practically a non issue. Check it out..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's definitely no reason not to look at DSLR brands like Sony and Olympus. They make excellent stuff, no doubt about it, and my continual recommendation of Canon equipment only reflects my knowledge of that line (and my limited knowledge of Nikon and lack of knowledge of Sony and Oly lines).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Well Molly doesn't have any snow on her.   You been drinkin?  
    • 70 pages dealing with Donald Trump and I can't find much that says anything on the positive side, of course in the past year and a half he hasn't said much that's been positive either.
    • @Neighbor_guy    Oh, I think the dismount was memorable too. 
    • I have fished for trout in my home waters for fifty-five years. The places I call home are the waters of the Wisconsin driftless area. Trout are my favorite species to chase. The trout of my waters have fluctuated over my more than a half century of fishing. Trout are instinctual creatures.  The big wily brown trout are my quarry.  They are portrayed as superior entities when in fact they have a brain the size of a pea. Do you want the keys to the castle?   I have seen many trends and fads come and go in the trout world.  This fancy rod and that special fly have cycled through a dozen times in my lifetime. Anglers come and go and so do the latest new fangled trends.  The constants in the trout world are the seasons and good old Mother Nature.  If you want a real leg up on those trout you should pay attention to the seasons and the changes they cause in the trout’s environment.     The weather in Wisconsin can be a harsh mistress.  The extremes are the norm here.  We could have twenty inches of snow on the ground and below zero temperatures and what seems like a blink of the eye in Wisconsin it changes.  The snow could melt and the next time you go fishing it could be radically different.  You need to roll with the seasonal changes and modify the way you fish and where you fish.

        This frigid morning in January was shaping up to be a “skunk” outing.  My friend was cold and told me he had enough and wanted to head back to the vehicle.  I talked him out of heading back.  We had taken the stream temperatures earlier and we hadn’t found a one reading over thirty-six degrees.

      The outdoor temperature was twenty-six degrees and not looking like it was going to warm up.  I had scouted this area prior and our fishing was going to get better I told him.
        Do you see the log laying on the right side of the stream?  Just on the other side of the log is a tiny trickle feeding in.  This trickle is a tiny spring.  Springs run year round here at about forty-two degrees constant.  Where that spring fed in caused a six degree temperature swing just downstream.  That little trickle made the stream bearable for the trout.    I have found many trickles during the early season when the grass is down that I cannot see even a month later due to weed growth.  It was like the Bahamas in that halo of the spring.  We caught seven trout in that tiny spot. Many feeders are not easily found during the summer.  They are covered up by weeds.  You can only discover them when the weeds are down in winter or early spring. I emphasize the word trickle here because they may be tiny and you will miss them if you are not looking for them.   My friend Andy and I fished this exact hole in September.  We both caught four trout each in this bend in September.  We couldn’t buy a bite in March.  What was different now?  First off the water temperatures were in the sixties in September and in the middle thirties in March. Trout lay in different areas during cold and warm conditions.     In Wisconsin winters the trout are in survival mode.  They need to find good lays where they don’t have to expend too much energy to hold in place and wait for food. The calories required to hold in place in this cold fast water is a negative formula for calories gained. This shallow fast current hole is great when the water temperatures are in the sixties and the trout can hide in the broken fast water.  In thirty degree water this holding place has no one home.  I would look for the deepest water either direction for two hundred yards.  This is where the trout would winter.
      One picture says a thousand words.  It was twenty degrees below out this day. The water temperature at this spring head tells the tale. It measured at forty degrees.  I like to call these Bahamas causing the water temperatures to fluctuate. A thermometer is a must to get a leg up on these instinctual creatures. This spring is a glaring thermal. 

       Many anglers discount some thermals because they are not so obvious.  A swamp is nothing more than a spring spreading out and they have the same properties as a small stream emptying into a larger waterway.  There does not need to be an obvious entry point to these swamps causing thermals.  They can leech through the surrounding banks and make their way into your stream.
        I am going to stay on thermals but switch seasons.  The temperature fluctuations you found to indicate where to find the wily trout in winter holds true in the dog days of summer.  I went with a Natural Resources crew to do a shocking.     The stretch we were to shock was a non-designated area way below typical trout water.  Even on a typical summer’s day in Wisconsin this waterway was almost too warm to fish in it.  Many anglers considered this “frog water” and dismissed it.  What a giant mistake they were making. 

       When water temperatures are near seventy degrees, it is recommended not to fish for trout.  It plain and simply puts too much stress on the fish and raises the mortality rates to an unacceptable risk for the trout.  Streams that are warmer have less dissolved oxygen in them.  Trout caught in water near seventy degrees have a hard time recovering from a battle due to the lack of oxygen.     I was in charge of the thermometer and Garmin on this trek into frog water with the fisheries folks.  Every thirty yards I was asked to take the temperature and write it down with the GPS coordinates. I was asked to submerge the thermometer at least halfway to the bottom to take the readings. I needed to hold the thermometer in place for ten seconds. I also was advised to make sure there was no secondary warming from my hands holding it.  The lead worker said the trout actually live in the lower half of water columns. The water temperatures hovered around seventy degrees at first.  We did not shock up trout in these areas.   We started to shock up some trout.  They were smaller fish.  I took the temperature and there was a slight change.  I looked around for a spring or a feeder creek.  There were none to be found. The fisheries staff told me to take more frequent measurements and log them. They were trying to prove a theory they had. I measured every ten yards on this stretch.  The temperatures continued to go down. The water temperatures were in the low sixties now and we were shocking numerous trout to the surface.  It was quite amazing how the numbers and sizes of the trout increased as the water got colder on this stretch.   We shocked up some true monsters from this waterway and then they just vanished.  The alpha or large predator trout had the lays in the coolest hides.  I could not see anything feeding in.  It was a true mystery to me.  There was a swamp about thirty yards from the stream.  It had no obvious entry points.  I followed my thermometer to its access point.  The swamp leeched into the stream and the only tell tale evidence was found with my thermometer.  

       The only visual evidence was softer banks that extended a couple of feet toward the swamps near the coldest points and these were my thermals.  I would not have discovered them without my thermometer. You can guess where the biggest brown were shock up correct?  Their noses were stuck right in the area where the trickles fed in.   I fish with many folks and they must grow weary of waiting for me to quit messing with my thermometer. Some stretches I fish regularly I leave my thermometer in my vest because of my historical data. My friend Dan Braun and I took a break during the midday of fishing due to water temperatures being too high and dangerous for the trout.  The outside temperature this day was eighty-eight degrees.  Dan took a temperature check at this spring head and it measured forty degrees. It is amazing to see a light bulb go on when another angler finally figures out why I am fiddling with my thermometer.
        The next time you fire up your computer check out the thermometers for sale.  There are many new and trendy versions.  There are many kinds.  I believe a keep it simple purchase is in order.  A bungee cord to hook them to your vest is a must purchase. A durable thermometer with easy to read numbers is what I carry. 

       I have been drawn to marginal frog water for over half a century now in Wisconsin’s driftless area.  My photos of big browns don’t lie.


       
    • Moose is staying home with no ice
    • Those "extended warranties" are mainly a cheap scam. The small print will ruin your day. And buying one AFTER  you have have the vehicle for a while compounds the mess.  Don't do it.
    • Til the end of my days, I will never understand why the northern states don't just stay open til January. What's it gonna hurt?
  • Our Sponsors