Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
fishlips

Digital TV - Channels no longer come in

11 posts in this topic

We have a cabin in the perham area. The change to digitial TV went well. Got the box, did the programming and was getting a crystal clear Fox channel from Fargo. Around Aug 1st, the channel went blank (no reception). Tried to re-teach/re-tune the box, but it can find no channels. The neighbor reported the same thing; the reception on the Fox channel went away.

Anyone have any thoughts on changes that may have occurred with the signal? The neighbor has a standard (old) antennea on his roof. I just have the old style rabbit ears located in doors on our 2nd floor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What may have happened was that you have a digital box with analog passthru. The Fox channel from Fargo may not have been mandated to make the digital switch in June. They probably recently converted to digital, therefore it cut down your broadcast range and you are no longer receiving the signal because you are too far from the broadcasting towers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yup, the box has analog passthru. So the pure digital signal has less range when compared to the older, analog signal? That could very well be the issue. Looks like I may have to go with a raised, outdoor antenna that can recieve the UHF and VHF signals.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I always wonder who really is benefitting from the change over...I definitely don't think its us the consumer. I have heard more people talk about wanting to get cable now because they are getting worse reception. Hmmm.

We got better reception and more channels before the change...and I live in shoreview where the tv towers are.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I always wonder who really is benefitting from the change over...I definitely don't think its us the consumer. I have heard more people talk about wanting to get cable now because they are getting worse reception. Hmmm.

We got better reception and more channels before the change...and I live in shoreview where the tv towers are.

You can bet that the Feds are going to be the one's who will benefit the most when they start selling off the old bandwidth but that another story. Living that close to the broadcast towers might be the case of having to much power and the need for a weaker antenna but you should have a lot more channels. I would think that you should have decent reception with just a wire loop across your uhf input or maybe no antenna at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had much trouble ne of Duluth. Called FCC and they were little or no help. Called and talked to a technician named Jim from Ch 3/6 stations in Duluth. Very helpful and pleasant man. this was his recommendations:

1. Get an antenna built to receive digital signals

2. Get it high enough

3. Replace coaxial cable with a newer RG6 (I had #5)

4. Buy a signal booster to use between antenna and tv

Try these things in order!

I had to do all of these and seemed to need all. $150 later I now have many channels that I rarely watch at the cabin anyway! Somebody's making some money on this one and again, it's not the consumer!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I read, and believe, there is no such thing as a "digital" antenna. My moms 40 year old roof top antenna works just fine in the northern burbs. 30 year old "rabbit ears" pick up the digital signals, all local channels by the way, in my home as well. Both places have no signal boost amplifier either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm just north of McGregor about 55 miles from Duluth. I put up a digital power amped antenna that was mid-range and low cost. I had intended it for use in Mpls but brought it up to test out. It brings in everything good except Ch 3/6. I talked to Jim also and found out I'm bringing in VHF only. Evidently UHF has less range. I also had a dish installed and I carry my satellite box back & forth, so it's not a big issue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It really depends on where you are located and if you can receive a good signal or not. I think 3/6 go out over UHF and 10 & 8 (out of Duluth) go out of VHF. (or is it the other wy around?) If you are located in a depression ie...near a lake? you may have to get that antenna up higher to catch the signal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You must make sure that your antenna is both VHF and UHF in order to pick all of the channels. I know in the Duluth area that some of the channels were in the 40s but would come in as 3-2 or something like that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We have a cabin on Otter Tail and have cable. The best part we are on seasonal so we pay just 6 months but it's on all winter long. Sure we only go up a few times in the winter but it sure is nice. I think it's probably not cost effective to shut off and on the seasonal customers so they just leave them on. And this year having fox channel this year will be a little more important.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Those sure are pretty snowflakes..........
    • Misguided by love as pure as the driven snow.  
    •   Yep, am with ya......and most of us thank you. Should not be a difficult concept to understand.....except for a select Jv few.
    • So was I.  When I say "my equipment" won't be freezing up when I am hole hopping with the aid of my toasty warm Otter cottage, part of my equipment that won't be freezing up would be the ez ducer...   
    • Reinhardt was sincere, and I don't believe he was trying to sell anything,  He had a lot of knowledge about meat, and simply wanted to share it.   I didn't fault him for his politics, either.  He was simply misguided on that....        
    • I took Mickey in 2008. Bubbles 4 years later. Not too worried about winning as some on here .....as winning in  those years wasn't really winning, and so far, neither is picking the winner in 16, other than saying you picked the winner and "get it".
    • Had an opportunity to tag along with LeeKen to Bluestem Nature Conservancy and sit in a blind Saturday morning.  Thought it was unusual to see a deer with antlers late March.
    •     I was thinking more like Goofy=Pres. Trump
    • Murphy’s Law   I went out this afternoon trout fishing.  I questioned the wisdom of fishing on a robin’s egg blue sky day.  Trout shun sunlight.  I went outside to check the weather. The warmth of the afternoon coaxed me out of the house.     I fished a stretch I have done well on in the past.  I knew because of the bright sun I would more than likely not do well on big trout this outing.  Trout do not have eye lids and shun bright sun. When I got to the stream the outdoor temperature was 58 degrees.  I took the water temperature and it was almost 50 degrees.  That is well within a good temperature range to score some trout.     I hit the water at 2:45pm.  The sun was high in the sky and not a single cloud was in the sky.  I knew from experience that days like these I typically fished the shaded side of the stream.  There was no shaded side of the stream.      The fishing was tough.  I had lots of follows and flashes at my lure.  None seemed to want to commit.   I decided to look for cover for the trout.  I decided anything to throw a little shade on the trout would make them feel comfortable.     The trout had lock jaw.  I decided to target broken water so the trout would feel secure and come out in the bright light.  They still were bashful.  I decided another trick was in order. I was going to throw in the biggest snarly messes and let the lure drop to the bottom and give it a tweak to start the blade going.  Bang bang and I was in business.  This only worked in deep runs and i lost a few lures throwing into the mess.     I ended the outing with 24 brown trout to hand. The biggest was about 16 inches.  It was 5:30pm.  I usually get out at a bridge and today was nothing different.  I stood on the bridge looking upstream.  There was a sweet log jam just upstream of the bridge and it was in shadows.     I decided i was going to go just upstream in the shadows and cast a few more times. I was still on the bridge looking upstream. I looked at my reel and there was a loop on the spool.  This loop needed to be cast out if I was going to continue fishing.  I decided the bridge afforded the best angle and no trees in the way to cast out the loop in my spool.     I cast off the bridge.  The loop caught and dropped my cast about 15 yards upstream.  It nearly didn't land in the water.  It hit tight to the bank and I had a big snarl in my reel.  I looked down and saw my panther martin was barely in the water.  I decided to pull off some line and get this snarl out.  I made even a bigger mess.     I sat down on the bridge rail and started to mess with my giant snarl.  I again looked at my lure and it was barely in the water.  I was worried about losing the lure because of the snarl.  It was safe and barely dangling in the water.     I  really made a mess with the reel.  I was cussing it and trying to untangle it.  I lost focus on my lure in the water. I was peering over my glasses and really putting all my attention on this mess and I heard a splash sound.  I looked upstream and saw nothing.  I looked back at the reel.  I heard a louder splash and looked over the bridge at my lure suspended in the water.     My mouth dropped open wide and I stared in disbelief.  Me messing with the line caused the lure to jig up and down in the water.  This attracted a predator.  Not 2 inches from my lure was a giant trout suspended and staring at the size 9 gold panther martin deluxe waiting for it to move again.     My reel was still messed up so there was no battling this huge female trout on my reel if it decided to quit dancing with my panther martin and eat it. The bridge was at least 15 feet off the water and the idea of battling a monster trout from above was not appealing.  I worked frantically on the snarl.  It got even more messed up.     My fighting with this reel and keeping one eye on the giant female was nerve racking.  She still was very interested in my lure.  She circled it like a shark.  It was more than I could stand.  I decided if I hooked up with her with this less than optimal circumstances I would lose her and maybe kill her because of the bridge nonsense.     I decided to try to catch her another day.  The reel was non functional and i grabbed the line and lifted the lure out of the water.  What happened next is going to be relived in my dreams for the rest of my life.  The monstrous female brown bum rushed the lure as I lifted it out of the water.  It launched itself out of the water snapping at the spinner.  It was a swing and a miss. I got my wits back together and thought about cutting out the snarl and trying for her. I decided a return trip was on the agenda.  As I write this recollection I smile and cuss my circumstances.
  • Our Sponsors