Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
Swap Buck

Are 2in. Rage Broadheads legal in MN?

Recommended Posts

After reading the 2009 Minnesota hunting regulations something caught my eye. The rule book states on page 57 that; "Expandable" Broadheads may be used to take big game if they meet the above requirements and are (1) at least 7/8 inch in width and are no more then 2 inches in width at or after impact.

While reading one of the many mags I get. I saw in one of there adds that thay are claiming that the 2" Rage Hyper-Extends to 2.5" at impact. So my question is are they legal in MN? I shot them all last season and loved them, but this is the first I have heard of Rage's expanding to 2.5in.

For the record the mag that I saw the add in rhymes with "Home & Narrow" it was in the July issue on page 71.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep we talked about this last year and never got a solid answer. My take is this, when the blades are in the process of opening they can extend out to 2.5 inches but they are not cutting anything. Once the blades are in their cutting position they have a cutting diameter of 2 inches at impact and sound legal to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think if you went by the regs as it is worded now that they are illegal in MN. I know on the packages ive seen it says that they expand 2"+. I however have never heard of anyone getting busted on it though. Not sure what the reasoning is for the law, maybe had some problems in the past with larger broadheads not having enough penatration or something?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

legal or not, after taking deer with them, i think i'd still use them! how could you not! has anybody here not recovered a deer after sticking it with one of these? if not, where'd you hit it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"legal or not, after taking deer with them, i think i'd still use them! how could you not!"

Well then maybe we should all use lights, crossbows and baitpiles! how could you not!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

According to the laws, I would say illegal, but I shoot them.

I guess if they are illegal, why are they being sold in Minnesota?

Mark

Just because it is sold in MN doesn't mean it is legal to use.

You can purchase the fancy colored lights for underneath your low rider in MN, but if you got caught, you will get a ticket.(Speaking from experience)

Don't forget about all that deer bait you can purchase in MN also.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"and are no more then 2 inches in width at or after impact."

The law states no more then two inches at OR after impact, please note the importance of the word "or". So at impact they are two inches and perfectly legal in my opinion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think they are legal as long as you dont get caught. I would guess they are illegal if you get stoped and kop an attitude with the CO.

"Not larger than 2inches" means just that. If your heads are bigger than 2" (2.5" in this case) than they are outside the lines. (by a half an inch wink )

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My guess is the dnr really doesnt care about them. They dont have exploding tips or anything like that. Every sporting goods store in the state sells them and they are the hottest broadhead on the market right now. If they cared they would put time and effort into find people who use them and fine them which really wouldnt be that hard, i think they care more about people who are baiting then rage broadheads

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My guess is the dnr really doesnt care about them. They dont have exploding tips or anything like that. Every sporting goods store in the state sells them and they are the hottest broadhead on the market right now. If they cared they would put time and effort into find people who use them and fine them which really wouldnt be that hard, i think they care more about people who are baiting then rage broadheads

Yah, they don't care until a person shoots the next state record with one, and then they swoop in and claim that you took the deer illegaly with the over 2" broadhead. grin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

legal or not, after taking deer with them, i think i'd still use them! how could you not! has anybody here not recovered a deer after sticking it with one of these? if not, where'd you hit it

As a first year archer last year I thought I practiced a lot. I though I knew my bow very well. A day or two after reading your posts about arrowing your buck I had a similar opportunity on a doe. Despite all the preaching of taking only broadside or quartering away shots, when the time came, the adrenalin rose, and your posts crept into my head. My rage 2 blade ended up sticking the sternum. Deer not recovered.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Not larger than 2inches"

See you only used one part of the quote, there is a large different between your quote and the actually law stating "no more then 2 inches in width at or after impact." So if the blades are not larger that two inches at impact or after the blades are deployed they are legal. Now if you want to play with the blades and stick them out like wings on a plane and measure over two inches that is fine but it does not make them illegal becaue they are 2 inches or less at impact. There are several other expandables with two inch cutting diameters that would measure well outside of 2 inches if you put the blades in a certain position, I wonder why no one is making a big deal about those broadheads???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

because those methods are already illegal. why is everyone in such a haten mood. jeez! i can see how rage are 50/50 as to being legal, but the new blood runners by NAP, i would have to say are illegal. they are 2 1/4 inch after impact

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

legal or not, after taking deer with them, i think i'd still use them! how could you not! has anybody here not recovered a deer after sticking it with one of these? if not, where'd you hit it

Nope i've shot two deer with them and found both within 100 yards, one was even a gut shot. Poor shot I know but the deer took a step just as I released it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:
See you only used one part of the quote, there is a large different between your quote and the actually law stating "no more then 2 inches in width at or after impact." So if the blades are not larger that two inches at impact or after the blades are deployed they are legal. Now if you want to play with the blades and stick them out like wings on a plane and measure over two inches that is fine but it does not make them illegal becaue they are 2 inches or less at impact. There are several other expandables with two inch cutting diameters that would measure well outside of 2 inches if you put the blades in a certain position, I wonder why no one is making a big deal about those broadheads???

Great explaination. Makes perfect sense to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was at the gamefair today and stopped by the dnr booth and posed this question to the CO and two other dnr employees. Everyone grabbed a book and looked up the rule. Same argument as above. I then asked the CO what his take was. He told me that if it measures more than 2 inches when deployed at rest, it would be illegal. He said that the entry hole is always bigger than the broadhead? (I guess I don't know this for a fact, being new to archery and all) I mean, how would anyone be able to tell exactly how big the blades are at impact, before impact, after impact?

So I guess it would be up to CO on location to make the call?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He said that the entry hole is always bigger than the broadhead? (I guess I don't know this for a fact, being new to archery and all)

Because there is usually some degree of an angle during the shot the broadhead slices the entry a little larger. Just picture a broadhead going in at an angle.

I've seen some pics of steep angle shots of a Rage 2-blade and the entry hole looked like it was 4" wide!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: vister
legal or not, after taking deer with them, i think i'd still use them! how could you not! has anybody here not recovered a deer after sticking it with one of these? if not, where'd you hit it

As a first year archer last year I thought I practiced a lot. I though I knew my bow very well. A day or two after reading your posts about arrowing your buck I had a similar opportunity on a doe. Despite all the preaching of taking only broadside or quartering away shots, when the time came, the adrenalin rose, and your posts crept into my head. My rage 2 blade ended up sticking the sternum. Deer not recovered.

Jameson, it's a shame you lost a deer, but hopefully you use the experience to make you a more efficient bow hunter in the future. Everybody gets excited and wants to make things happen, but you'll do better in the long run waiting on quality broadside or quartering away shot. The more you bowhunt the more you'll talk to guys who lost deer they shot head on. It' a great shot with a rifle and an iffy proposition with a bow.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • So many beautiful carps! Keep them coming
    • Heard about this trick before.
    • Wow.....6th win of the season and it gets called ugly.......J/K. Getting down to the last few races and we have a pretty good battle going on for the top spot. I know I’m about out of decent picks left but we’ll see what happens. Good luck everybody 
    • Watched a nice 8 or 10 chase a doe back and forth for 45 min on Monday night. He checked her several times but she didn’t want anything to do with him. Few scrapes then showed up that night as well. About an hour north of the cities. 
    • Sorry but $200 seems pretty high for that thing to me. Thousands of less expensive alternatives.
    • Looks like a great project.  A DYI froth pak for $500 or so will do 12 sq ft at 1" thick.  Most home improvement stores carry these.  
    • I got a set of FXR FLoating bibs on clearance from the place in Rush City that goes along with my jacket I bought last year. It is really warm and lite.
    • Nilight Led Light Bar 2PCS 18w 4" Flood Driving Fog Light Off Road Lights Boat Lights driving lights Led Work Light SUV Jeep Lamp,2 years Warranty https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00IY3YLCI/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_Pj75zbQ34AMAQ
    • Last weekend I switched out my ramp door for a bay window.  I'd like to spray foam it, but I'm sure I won't be able to find anyone willing to do it professionally in my area, at least not at a reasonable price.  Last winter I had to drive an hour and a half to get the rest of it spray foamed for about $2000.  One company told me they wouldn't fire up their equipment for less than 1800. For this small of an area I'm thinking I would be just fine with the foam boards @ 2-3/4" thick with the furring.  Otherwise, does anyone know how well those Menards Froth Packs work?  $360 still seems kind of spendy to spray foam that little area myself.  
    • That's awesome. I gave mine a test last night and they weren't bright enough. I might have to order some bright lights from Amazon. 
  • Our Sponsors