Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
helpme

Scopes on Muzzleloaders

Recommended Posts

I think if you get a good quality scope that is made for the shock from the loader, it is not bad. i looked at a Habicat or Swarovski. I would be afraid a cheap scope would not take the abuse. I am a full swarovski hunter, i know the expense but only want to buy one in a life time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i say no thanks. i know muzzleloaders are a primitive method of hunting, but we are at huge advantages already with the use of pelleted powder, primers, and the bullets and sabots that we are shooting. would a scope be nice on a muzzleloader? yes it would be. would i use one if the laws allowed us to, probably not. because if it could be scoped, then why not just be able to use the ruger no. 1 7mm in the gun cabinet? which is a single shot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

nay.

I admit that it is a flip-flop from my stance in the past. Blame it on old age. IMO restrict the archery and muzzleloader regulations so that only the dedicated sportsmen will be attracted to them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think both the archery and muzzleloader folks are in a niche market. Here is az we can look at the number of tags for rifle compared to the other two. it is far less for achery and even smaller for muzzle. So using a muzzleloader with a scope is not going to change the distance, only give the user a clear target than open sights. I like both, and would support the use if it ever came up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No scopes!

With todays Muzzies, there is very little difference between them and a single shot rifle. If you want to use a muzzy with a scope, then use it during the regular firearms season.

I like that idea, too, of keeping it raw enough so only the dedicated partake.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Put me on the NEY side! There is no point of having a separate season if you are going to put a scope on and shoot 200+ yards with a muzzy.

Its a traditional wheapon and I say keep it old school and open sites. I think you can have a zero or 1 power scope now but I would rather just stay away from scopes in general.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Put my name on the "NEY" side also. They are already to modern and I am very accurate out to 100yds as it is. I just wish that darn woods rat was as easy to hit as a 100yrd target. No need for scopes on muzzleloaders during that season.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would be in the ney column as well modern muzzeloaders resemble the traditional ones in name only, in full disclosure I do have a 1x red dot on mine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd vote yes ..... and I say yes because we already allow pelleted propellants (that are not black powder), jacketed sabot bullets, shotgun primers, etc etc etc. Since all those things are already allowed I don't understand why the line was drawn at scopes.

A scope doesn't make a gun shoot farther or straighter or flatter --- it allows the shooter to do a better job of aiming. All the other things I mentioned like the propellants, shotgun primers, sabot bullets etc. improve the performance of the actual gun itself.

I've muzzleloader hunted out west in open country for whitetails and muledeer. Scopes were allowed out there and I'm really glad I had one. Where I hunt in MN and WI scopes are not allowed and the shooting distances are usually a lot closer .... but I'd still use a scope if I could.

For the people that want to keep it a "primitive" hunt and use that as a reason for not allowing scopes ----- I'd like to see a blackpowder only season - no primers, no modern propellants or bullets. But I doubt if enough guys would hunt in that season to make it worth while????

Also, I understand the argument that if you want to use a scope on your ML then hunt in the regular firearm season ..... the problem with that is I have other guns I like to use too, and wouldn't be able to use them if I used my ML in the firearms season.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

just put a scope on your muzzy and use it instead of a shotgun during firearms season. if we are able to put scopes on our muzzleloaders, then why even have a seperate season? with a scope, they are by far more accurate out to greater distances than any shotgun made. the only downside is we are limited to one shot...most of the time. leave the ML season scopeless! open sights and one shot make people definetely think about squeezing that trigger.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
RS    0

Ney all the way! That is the main reason I started muzzleloader hunting. Less hunters in the woods and for us (me)that hunt public land it is a treat not to have the woods full of hunters. Which in the past 5 years the muzzy population has grown.

Perchjerker--I do agree with you that a scope makes you aim better, but without it you are not going to take many shots over 100 yds. I know my muzzy could probably easily kill at 300 yds. (Never tried it) with a scope and to me that takes away from the true nature of muzzleloading. Yes, we are using inline rifles and high power propellants and bullets, but we still only (most of the time) have one shot with iron sights and have to have a pretty good aim at short range also. Good luck to everyone this fall!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

if the dnr is going to make one choose to use a doe permit in lottery areas then why should it be such a bad idea to let someone put a scope on their muzzy so they have a better chance to fil their tag. if was stil anything goes i might have a slightly different thoughtbut if you choose muzzy season to get your deer then you should get the best chance possible to suceed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lou, do you have any comments?

Heck no, I'm not getting in the middle of this one! smile The only thing I'll say is opinions are varied and well represented on this board. It's also one of those issues that has gathered Legislative interest. If you follow the legislature you know there are individuals in the House and Senate who have very strongly held opinions on this issue (from both sides). Typically, the Senate introduces a scopes bill and the House counters with a sidelock only season. A couple of years ago they settled on banning smokeless powder in muzzleloaders (don't ask how that happened). Typically, both provisions are removed in conference committee and the end result is no change.

The agency hasn't taken an official stance because of the legislative interest. Basically, if we made the change it would likely be changed again in statute when the Legislature came back in session.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

NAY

If you truly have vision problems you can get a permit to hunt muzzleloader season with a scope after doctors recommendation. Tony Knight's argument about older eyes not focusing well enough to use open sights doesn't work either. My good friend who is an eye doc says just use a peep sight. That rear sight is supposed to be fuzzy as you just focus on the front sight. I think it is part of the hunt to see that trophy standing broadside just out of your effective range. Believe me I have been there. Instead of thinking "Man I wish I had a scope!", you should be thinking "Man, how can I out wit that animal?" That is the challenge you take on when muzzleloading in my opinion.

lakevet

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

excactly. modern muzzleloaders are accurate, and efficient, however, remaining scopeless makes it much more challenging! may require a little bit of calling to the deer, or vacating your stand to begin the stalk to get within range. whats wrong with that? i would think both options definetely crank up the intensity of the hunt!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

excactly. modern muzzleloaders are accurate, and efficient, however, remaining scopeless makes it much more challenging! may require a little bit of calling to the deer, or vacating your stand to begin the stalk to get within range. whats wrong with that? i would think both options definetely crank up the intensity of the hunt!!!

I agree with everything you say.

But I still don't understand why the line was drawn at scopes on muzzleloaders.

Under your reasoning why not ban scopes on shotguns, handguns and/or rifles .... they are accurate and efficient firearms and if you took away the scopes it would make it more challenging and might require more calling or stalking. Why should MLs be treated any different than other modern firearms?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

scopes on muzzleloaders are not the discussion, the discusion is based on the fact that muzzleloders have a special season only because of the semi primitive function of their operation, allowing them to be scoped is just one step further away from their primitive roots thus eliminating the distinction that allows them a special season in the first place.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No scopes, I like it the way it is. I am firm beliver in haveing a scope on a rifle or a shotgun for deer but during muzzel loader season I go to the iron sights and do it the way I was taught as a boy ande I reaaly enjoy drawing a bead with iron sights on a deer when the smomke clears hopefully find a blood trail.

I started blackpowder hunting with a percusion cap and not the 209 shotgun primmer now I have an inline witn a 209 primmer and think that I might try a flint lock this year to really get back to the real primitive aspect of the hunt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I do muzzy hunt along with bow hunt and i dunno about the rest of you but where i hunt, the deer are soo scared by the time muzzy season comes around that they sit in thick cover and dont come out unless they are chased or its dark. It is also a shotgun zone so I wouldnt mind being able to use a scope. OR they could run their season like iowa. there is a early muzzy season for residents only in oct. I think the dnr should promote muzzy hunting. You still have one shot. You give us a less desirable season then everyone els, why not cater to the muzzy hunters?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • Really great colors there now and butterflies by the thousands. get there if you can. Headed over for 2 hours today. Heres a few pics. Pics from Munsinger
    • Plus+1 last weekend got into a good bite in about 31-35 feet and they were all full of Minnows.
    • @Tom Sawyer   Any idea what this is with the painted lady?  Only saw this one at Munsinger.  Really a beauty. 
    • Thanks Juneau.... Just an FYI to everyone - HH is my account
    • Interesting take on the Koivu Signing:   Perhaps most galling about all of this is Michael Russo of The Athletic tweets there is a no-move clause in Koivu’s extension. Why on earth would Fletcher agree to include a no-move clause in an aging player’s contract? It’s bad enough when you give a no-move clause to a productive player who suddenly hits the cliff but in Koivu’s case there was no reason to do this. Heck, there was no reason to give him any type of extension in the first place. He also was entering the final season of a seven-year, $47.25 million contract that will pay him $5.4 million in 2017-18. Allowing Koivu to play out that contract made perfect sense. If he had productive 2017-18, he might be brought back but there also was the potential that his money could have been used on a younger, more attractive talent. Koivu is coming off a productive 2016-17 season in part because he was able to move from first- to second-line center playing behind 32-year-old Eric Staal. Koivu had 18 goals and 58 points and was a plus-27 in 80 games, spending much of the season with Mikael Granlund and Jason Zucker on his wings. Like many Wild players, Koivu didn’t do much in the Wild’s five-game first-round playoff loss to the Blues. He had one goal, one assist and was a minus-1. All of this set up Koivu with the opportunity to return this season and prove he could remain a productive and durable player. When it came to Koivu’s contract, the Wild finally was in an ideal spot. That is no longer the case. Instead, the Wild has Koivu locked up for three more years and, thus, put themselves right back in the type of salary-cap situation they should be trying to escape.
    • Thats the way I ran mine.  One run of AC comes from the converter, and one run terminates in a male plug that goes into my inverter.  That outlet run is dead unless I am running it off my inverter but I just split the couple outlets I would need behind the TV and one other spot and it seems to be working flawlessly so far.  I can watch Dish TV without firing up the genny if I want.  Only time I would really do this is during a hot bite to minimize noise.  Outside of that, just let er run.
    • I guess we'll see in 8/9 months if he's worth $6 Million.....my point is they could have waited and resigned him in the off season for less...he never would have gotten that elsewhere...never...just leaving money on the table that could be spent more wisely elsewhere IMO.  Surpirsed he hasn't extended Parise/Suter for another 5 yrs at $9M/yr beyond the 10 he already signed them for   
    • I'm guessing that worms and crawlers wash into water systems after storms. So they are not totally foreign to being found in the water. Deep mudflats? Doubt it. But I do target storm sewer outlets on lakes shortly after rainfall with some success using natural colored rubber worms for bass. And have caught an occasional walleye while doing so.
    • Just relaxing and bobber fishing with the Mrs while camping up north 10 days ago, had decent sized suckers on. Had 8 suckers left for the evening bite. Found where some smallies seemed to be stacked. Two 18"ers, two 19"ers and what looked to be a 20" smallmouth that got off boat side.  A 23" walleye decided to get in on the fun, had a snip off and lost a fish in the weeds 25' feet down. Those were some productive minners. Bringing more next year. A nice double and my wife's new personal best bass. 19"
    • its same reason to cast frogs shallow back towards the shore late fall like they are jumping in the water. those walleyes know come fall thats what frogs do and are waiting to ambush them and makes for some great fishing.
  • Our Sponsors