Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
BoxMN

Pulling rear shocks off a 02 Yammie Venture

13 posts in this topic

Hi guys,

I need to rebuild shocks for my 02 Venture (2-up...). What all does it take to get shocks off? Sleds are at the cabin, and I don' thave book. Can I do it without a book? I think I have ownwers manual at the cabin.

Do I tip on side, or hoist it up from bumper to garage joist to remove? Any tricks? I am not mechanic, but can do carbs and other normal stuff on trucks/motors, etc. Just never did shocks as I am still sledding newbie smile

About How much would it cost at dealer?

Thanks for any info.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If it's anything like my Polaris and Ski Doo then there's really not much to it. Just wrap a rag or towel around the rear bumper bar so you don't scratch it and use a chain fall if available hooked to an overhead beam. Once off the ground a bit take a look at the shock and you'll see their not hard to get out. Sometimes you need to unhook the Track from the Tunnel, but I don't believe so on yours. Hope this helps

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have never had the rear skid out it may be worth pulling that and going through all the wheel bearings and changing the hyfax if needed while the rear shocks are being rebuilt. Probably a little easier to pull the rear shocks with the skid out also!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys. It's time for hyfax, and I am not sure if wheel bearings were greased last, so might as well do it all with it out.

Usual hand tools are all I need? No tricks to getting it lined up upon reinstallation?

Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

what i do for an articcat is take a comealong and a tow rope i take the tow rope, wrap it around the raptor and hook the chain to the bumper and pull it straight up and take the 4 bolts and remove the whole suspension.. wayy easier to deal with..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks broken line. Stupid Question Alert ...

- what is a "raptor"?

Also, with comealong, how do you lower it "gently"? When mine is under pressure, I can't easily get it to reverse ratchet...

Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the beams that go across the ceiling.. a large tree branch works in a pinch.. you lift the lever push the button on the back to release and let the lever down and repeat till its on the floor.. i can have the whole suspension out and back in in under an 40 min..BTW i took mine for a ride today in the grass and it was like a ciggaret for a smoker after a long sunday service! gotta pressure wash round the engine and ride again to heat the wateraway

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey guys, a quick update - I replaced the slides and dropped the rear end of the suspension. It actually was three bolts on each side for the rear, but I left the front in there, just dropped the rear down.

But here is where my rookieness shows again smile How do I tell if the shocks can be rebuilt? I was expecting to see some large nuts or other indication of being rechargable, but I see there are little spot welds on the shocks.... I left them in for now until I get more info. I still can't find my manuals, I know I have them somewhere!...

Also, I took the nut off one end of the rear shock, and the bolt has little teeth that seem like they are used for an additional tweak, but I don't want to just "rap" that bolt out. Do I need a shock compressor of some sort? The shock and spring seem like it is in there pretty tight.

Thanks for more info!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not so familiar with Yamaha's, but I'm not so sure there are re-buildable shocks in sleds of this nature (2-up).

More than likely you will see a gas reservoir connected via gas line to the shock (like some Fox shocks). Shocks like RydeFX aren't re-buildable, or at least from my experiences..

My take: If there is an obvious problem with the suspension performance I would change the shock(s). When I've had shocks fail there really isn't any suspension, and it's obvious!

As far as re-buildable shocks, it's recommended to service them every year because of moisture concerns, not so much so in sealed, non serviceable, oil shocks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Chuck. I was kinda thinking that, cause they just don't look "cool" or techy at all, not like the front shocks. And when I drop the sled (breaking snow/ice loose) or juust get off of it, the rear does not rise at all. So I assuming that is dead shocks.

Do I need to get shock compressor/clapm to get them off? It just doesn't look like something I want to just "bang" the bolt out of the shock/mount.

Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The sled not rising part of the way up could be do to the rear springs on the skid, not necessarily the shocks. The shocks mainly provide the dampening, the springs provide the action of pushing the rear end up. Over time the springs can get bagged out.

If the sled is bottoming out on bumps a lot, good chance it could be the shocks. If the rear end is just not rising back up at all, I would look at the springs. I would also make sure the main arms of the rear skid (and shafts going through them) are greased properly and not sticking or bent. Last, a skid on a sled will not necessarily rise all the back to the top after you get off. This is because when going over bump the suspension will need to extend further and then compress more when going over bumps than what the standard sitting height of the sled will be. You would not expect to replace non-rebuildable shocks every year, but they certainly could be shot by now. Just some things to think about. Usually [i think] the manual will give you instructions on where the sled should sit with rider weight vs rider off the sled.

What does [or did] the rear end do now that it is not covered in ice? Does it rise up now?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks 311. Right now it will bounce up a bit, but not much. So maybe it is not the shocks... I do know that the folks I got the sled from (niece and nephew) used it two up with my neice and her son, not exactly a lightweight package wink But I also see that the springs are not set to the tightest setting. Maybe I should just set the springs tighter and see if that helps?

I can't really say if it was bottoming out, as my wife rode this one more last year, and I just really used it for ice fishing on flat snow.

I really gotta find that manual...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've always tapped the bolts out that hold the shocks. They aren't under pressure. Then again, I don't know what you have/see and I've never worked on a Yammy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Could be that others cheated also.   I was relying on memory about the BMW connection and hypothesized that Mercedes would also have been a possibility.   I did say "maybe mercedes".     In any case, VW cheated on emissions for many years with the assent of the highest levels of management.     Apparently making a small diesel that runs ok and doesn't make too much pollution at an acceptable cost is really hard.
    • License what technology, this kind?        https://www.google.com/amp/www.cnbc.com/amp/2017/04/27/after-vws-record-fine-mercedes-benz-parent-daimler-could-be-next.html     "In light of the ongoing governmental information requests, inquiries and investigations, and our own internal investigation, it cannot be ruled out that the authorities might reach the conclusion that Mercedes-Benz diesel vehicles have similar functionalities," Daimler said in its newly released quarterly report. The maker first acknowledged in January that authorities had begun probing its handling of diesel emissions. That was the same month that VW agreed to settle a criminal probe by the U.S. Justice Department, a federal judge this past week approving the payment of a $2.8 billion fine. Almost 40 times the legal limit In the VW case, the mainstream German automaker rigged the software controlling two diesel engines to recognize when a vehicle was undergoing emissions tests and then adjust pollution levels. In real-world situations, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency asserted, those powerplants would produce up to 40 times the legal limit for pollutants like smog-causing oxides of nitrogen. Since the scandal broke in September 2015, regulators in the U.S. and the European Union have begun rechecking the emissions claims made by other manufacturers, including Daimler, General Motors, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles and others. In January of this year, the EPA took aim at FCA, alleging that it may have used its own, rigged software on products like the Ram 1500 EcoDiesel which "appeared to cause the vehicles to perform differently when being tested" than when in use in real-world conditions. That same month, Daimler said that what the EPA was concerned about "apparently includ(ed) functionalities that are common in diesel vehicles, as undisclosed Auxiliary Emission Control Devices (AECD)." While the German parent of both the Mercedes-Benz and Smart brands did not confirm it had broken the law, it laid open the possibility that its own diesel emissions strategy could be in trouble. "If these or other inquiries, investigations, legal actions and/or proceedings result in unfavorable findings, an unfavorable outcome or otherwise develop unfavorably, Daimler could be subject to significant monetary penalties, remediation requirements, vehicle recalls, process improvements and mitigation measures," Daimler stated.
    •   Wow, Del I forgot all about that little discussion you started two years ago.  All the fun folks were in on it, even the LIMITOUT. That's what happens when you have short term memory loss and and pictures bring on new thoughts and emotions.  Let's just call this threat the "What a dang waste and shame!" More of an aftermath threat?  K
    • When we had are seasonal campsite I had lots of squirrels. I used all metal feeders. Come Sept them squirrels went in the freezer and cooked up for the wild game feed!
    • If you have been following the story, the reason VW got in this mess is they didn't want to license technology from BMW (or maybe Mercedes) and chose to develop their own.   When it couldn't be made to work properly, they chose to cheat rather than bite the bullet.    Long discussions of what happened as the story broke    
    • I had one of those.  Mine never quite ran right, although I lived with the quirks for years.  I have a pdf of service manual if you want it.   Mine ran rough intermittently at certain rpm.
    • If they make it better because of stupid government mandates it wouldn't bother me at all.   In fact, the Dodge ram diesel that I used to have had something from Daimler Benz that allowed it to meet the standards without DEF. I would not be surprised if they did something similar with those diesels and if they did I applaud them. The best thing anyone can do with the diesel trucks is delete the emissions and unlock the power and economy that are robbed from them.   
    • pellet gun does the job here  
    • I have to many squirrels, need the feeders with the metal holes.
    • build it and they will come. 
  • Our Sponsors