Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Ryan_V

Ford 3.0 vs 4.0

12 posts in this topic

I'm looking at downsizing my full size ford for an older Ranger with a V6. I'm thinking I want to be strict and get only the 4.0. is this a good engine?? what kind of milage can I expect with one with 150K on it?? How about power? my dad has a '94 with that engine in a regular cab and loves it. I'm looking at an extended cab (preferrably stick shift).

what about the 3.0?? In looking I've seen quite a few of those around also.

Thoughts...suggestions???? 80% of the use is trips back and forth to/from Mille Lacs ice fishing.

thanks!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

4.0 SOHC (2001 and newer) can be great or a nightmare. There is no in between. There are issues with intakes leaking vacuum. We have run into a few that have broken valve springs. They funny part is they have one timing chain in the front of the motor and one in the rear. In order to do any head work the motor comes out! These are not do it yourself friendly but not impossible to work on.

4.0 OHV - pushrod engine (2000 and prior) was pretty good. Every once and a while we'll see one with a burnt valve or a bad injector but overall not to bad.

3.0 OHV has been around forever and is own of fords better motors! About the worst thing you'll see is the water pump going bad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What years are you thinking of?

The 3.0 engine doesn't have the power that the 4.0's have, but it is a very dependable motor, and if something breaks down, parts are cheap. As for the 4.0's, depending on the year you are looking for, there are 2 totally different 4.0 motors. One is a over head valve motor, the other is a single over head cam (SHOC) engine. The SHOC engine has a lot more power then the other, but costs more to repair when they do break down.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a 92 explorer with a 4.0L a/t. I had over 230,000 miles on it when the trany went out. the engine never used any oil and averaged 15 city 20 or higher on the highway. I pulled a 2 place aluminum snowmobile trailor with 2 slides on it cruised right along. Gas mileage dropped off while towing though. The 3.0 is a 12 valve which is basicly built proof. I have 2 Taurus's with this motor and both are at 150000 miles and run great with no oil use.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't know much about fixing them, but I had a 2.9v6 in '87 Ranger, and a 3.0 in an '86 Taurus. Everything about the Ranger was a POS except the engine itself. I solf it off at 168k with a junk tranny, but the engine was great. It did go through 02 sensors like I go through Slim Jims though wink

The 3.0 in taurus was good engine. Tranny was pos, and suspension was pos, but the engine was good. Last about 130k when a one armed drunken women hit it while it was parked on road in St. Paul. No kidding... Heh, that was the end of that.

I will say, the v6 with 5 speed Ranger got worse mileage than my '98 k1500 with 350. I personally would not go back to small truck, ever, especailly with the mileage big trucks get nowadays, but I know some folks like the smaller trucks.

Good luck whichever you get.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1992 Ford Ranger 4x4 4.0L ext. cab AT. When I had light duty tires I used to get 23-25mpg highway (60mph). I couldn't believe the mileage. When I went to 30" BFG AT/KO my mileage dropped to 20. Best "truck" I ever owned, traded it with 138K miles for a full size truck.

1993 Explorer 4.0L auto, bought from original owner (friend) and drove to 160K miles before I sold it. Used a fair amount of oil somewhere, no leaks, didn't burn oil...suspected bad ring(s) or valve(s)? Never let us down. It's still going down the road with 200+K miles. 20-22mpg highway.

I am partial to the older 4.0L motors. Trannys were very strong in both vehicles, originals too. They were maintained well too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What years are you thinking of?

The 3.0 engine doesn't have the power that the 4.0's have, but it is a very dependable motor, and if something breaks down, parts are cheap. As for the 4.0's, depending on the year you are looking for, there are 2 totally different 4.0 motors. One is a over head valve motor, the other is a single over head cam (SHOC) engine. The SHOC engine has a lot more power then the other, but costs more to repair when they do break down.

I'm looking '94 or '95. Will the 3.0 handle a wheeler or maybe a 16' boat?? When I do use the truck, there is usually something heavy in the bed and/or a trailer behind it. that is why I was leaning twards the 4.0, but want to hear what people think of the 3.0, since I've seen alot more of those around!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One four wheeler won't effect it much, or a light 16 foot boat with a small motor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I pulled a 17' Alumacraft Tournament Pro 170 CS, it pulled it ok without overdrive. 16 mpg pulling it. I would get the 4.0 if pulling...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One other thing about a Ranger sized truck... I have had a 16' alum boat with a 90hp motor push me through a stop sign. The trailer did NOT have brakes, and the small truck is not very heavy. If you are used to a full sized truck, just give your self a lot of extra braking time. It will use it.

Now, granted, I was younger then, and drove differently than I do now wink

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

watch what gearing the rear end has. that can have a HUGE effect on power and gas mileage.

I have the 3.0L, 5 speed and 4:10 gears in my ranger. it pulls plenty good for a small truck. its no speed deamon, but it gets it done.

and I agree. the 3.0 is a dead reliable simple engine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a 3.0 in a 92 Aerostar and 4.0's in two more. I am a sales rep for a carpet manufacturer. Load them up with samples and your heavier than any boat you will pull. I have also had them fully loaded and pulled a 17.5' Stratos. The motor is not the problem. The issues to look into are brakes,drivetrain,springs and shocks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • I think that Lee is going to keep the momentum going and he proved that he can catch fish when others struggle.  It also seemed like he was more open minded to fish where the fish are and not stick with one pattern that seemed to fizzle out for some of the other guys. 
    • Rand Paul has put together a plan, and there are others, as well.   But as long as there is the requirement put forth by Trump and the Democrats that everyone will have healthcare coverage, whether they can pay for it or not, it's probably DOA...     https://www.paul.senate.gov/news/press/dr-rand-paul-unveils-obamacare-replacement-act  
    •   The only way to prevent single payer is for the Republicans to miraculously pull some other "terrific" plan out of their bums that they haven't been able to come up with in the last 7 years.   Good luck.
    •   I noticed you failed to provide examples.  
    • You can never have to many frogs.
    • They can come up with a workable healthcare law.   The hard (impossible) part is coming up with a workable healthcare law with all winners and no losers, as that is the requirement.
    • KVD is a hammer on Toledo. He is the only one I have slotted in for sure. A lot of really good sticks struggle on Toledo. I imagine 30+ percent of people will pick Hackney, but he really doesn't have a stellar track record there. This will be an interesting one. IIRC, many of their past stops at TB have been later in the year, like second week of May. A lot will depend on when the fish there spawn. Could be a tough transition bite, or it could be a freakin' amazing postspawn smashfest.
    • I am no expert, but I am guessing that you will be advised to put some insulation under it, and if you don't have insulation under the slab now, that may be an issue. I would also think that it would be better to keep your foundation/slab one piece for all. But again, i am not an expert in the least! We do have infloor heating in our cabin slab and it is very nice, and the off-peak/dual-fuel electric pricing makes it nice and affordable heat. Very nice on the feet in winter, and keeps the gas bill very low.   If you don't have off-peak/dual-fuel pricing then the electric may get very very expensive to run, especially without proper insulation missing from part of it.   Good luck.
    •   Nailed It!!!  Way too much tinkering went on...some of that brought on by Fletch...Hansal, White/Schroeder, Stewart for a 4th line would be just fine too...they have to dial in these remaining games to have the consistency needed for the playoffs.
    • If you want to keep it simple, buy a bunch of black Booyah Pad Crashers. They're relatively inexpensive (compared to some frogs, anyway), pretty durable, and draw tons of strikes. You can mess with different colors for fun, but you can't really go wrong with black.

      Terminator's new(ish) frogs are also amazingly good, and cast and walk better than Booyahs IMO.
  • Our Sponsors