Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0


3 posts in this topic

My daughters are working on their photography fair projects. Last September, I took one of them to Sioux Falls, and we learned how to take photos of waterfalls with the cottony water. They all want to do similar things this year as one of their photos.

My question is, have you ever put your tripod out in the water of a shallow stream to get a better shot of the moving water? Is there anything we really need to keep in mind, besides the obvious? We hope to head out to a local state park later today to test this out.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites


I've put tripods in lots of seemingly odd places and it can really pay off.

One thing to keep in mind is if the legs extend/collapse I wouldn't want water getting inside where the sections join. You'd probably have problems. I've never put one in water that deep, but I suppose you could duct tape a plastic bag around each leg in a pinch.

Good Luck


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sure have. Aside from the obvious potential pitfalls (and gearfalls), if the current is strong and uneven it may jar/push around the tripod in small ways. A weight (like a rock with a rope around it) hung from the center column of the tripod and suspended above the water usually does the trick if current is an issue.

To keep water from getting up inside the joints of the pod legs, just leave them extended and locked until they dry fully, which you can help along by using paper towels.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Posts

    • That is what I am trying to figure out.    Considering the party in the white House the only reason he/she got the sentence changed has 100% to do with his/her corporal Klinger syndrome.    And if that is the case the President should just walk away today before he causes any more harm.
    • The US gets Assange this way. Not difficult to understand.
    • It has a slight liberal bias: all major news media lies between the political ideology of a typical Democrat and a typical Republican. No outlet is going to intentionally dissuade 30% of the market, it's just bad business. With regards to Trump though, he has made an enemy of the press. It has little to do with his political affiliation and everything to do with his confrontational attitude. See this "come at me bro" of a statement from the Press Corps. Note they welcome Trump to sue them for the so called "fake news", probably because they are confident in the accuracy of their articles. Also realize that it is entirely possible for something to be accurate and biased: which is probably all you will see in Trump coverage from here until the end of his Presidency    
    • So we support intelligence depts now?
    • You mean fake Bruce Springsteen.  The real one is a librul and the fake one didn't want to urinate on the bed of the real one.   I'm sure Trump wanted them to play "Born in the USA" like all the other politicians that have no clue what that song is about but like the chorus.  
    • I'm trying to wrap my head around this one. Obama truly is a bigger POS than I thought. Good, God this is bizarro world. By commuting the sentence of this freak show, it's like burning down all the intelligence depts. Why do we have laws? 
    • So Obama is mad at the Russians for hacking and Wikileaks for publishing the hacks yet he just Pardoned Chelsea Bradley Manning who stole secrets and gave them to Wikileaks   This is a real WTF moment.
    • You failed to post the very next part of that very article:     You never patted Obama on the back for any of that oddly enough.   So either congratulate both or congratulate neither.
  • Our Sponsors