Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
DoubleLunger

COON

24 posts in this topic

Is it me or does there seem to be alot more dead ones on the road this year?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Same amount down here in the southwest corner. Lots.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is just you. They have been hit hard by distemper the last few years in many patrs of the state, you may see more big ones, but not the little ones like you would normaly see this time of year, now if you ask me there are sure a lot of dead grays on the road.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have seen more coons this spring that i have saw in the last few. Saw two batches of 6 in the last week. Hopefully they are finally shaking the disease and [PoorWordUsage]. May be a good year to get a bunch, but the price will make a guy puke.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was out west on Hwy 7 past Excelsior a couple weeks ago and I told one of my sons that there should be a suicide hotline for coons, with all of them I had seen hit along the roads. The last week, I've seen a bunch of young ones. My #2 son saw five in the farmyard by New Germany two nights ago. He got four of them. Racoons carry diseases that can affect horses so he shoots every coon and possum that he gets a crosshair on. The farm is just off the Crow River and he gets a lot of coon traffic there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why did the chicken cross the road? > to show the coon that it could be done. lol, I always liked that one

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It has been the same around here this year as last. I kep hoping they are all in their dens safe and sound till this fall.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it looks like the fur market is so bad right now that you wont even be able to get rid of them this fall as the buyers are sitting on the last 2 years of fur. I would bet only the best grade and extra extra big coon will be bought and the rest either at a dollar or nothing at all. If it don't turn around you will be seeing alot more coon hit on the roads as no one will be after em in the fall/winter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just the REAL trappers will be out this fall, and I am very happy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just the REAL trappers will be out this fall, and I am very happy.

agree!

I just had a long talk with my fur buyer lastnight, and its not going to be good this year. I might be freezing furs for a year or tanning and holding on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This could be a great year to travel and maybe run lines with other guys just for fun.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I do it for the enjoyment also but would like enough to cover gas is all. That maybe possible if the rat market stays alright. As of right now looks as if they will be the same as last year. $2.00 x 20 per day covers my gas. Can hope is all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was kayaking on the Blue Earth river on Sunday. I talked to an older gentleman who was on the bank south of Vernon Center. He was trapping coons to keep them from destroying his garden.

He told us he has trapped 90 so far this year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

90! holy cow. They are all over the road. If they find my garden quess what. Boom Boon Pow. I live In Wi and on my land all year with or without lic, Boon Boom POw.

Chad

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

90 wow, what a stupid piece of trash, get his name and turn him in. I bet he is not killing the deer and pheasents that are doing the smae. Turkeys do more damage to gardens than coon, ask any farmer who has a lot of thme around.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He was probably live trapping them. hahaha

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

90 wow, what a stupid piece of trash, get his name and turn him in. I bet he is not killing the deer and pheasents that are doing the smae. Turkeys do more damage to gardens than coon, ask any farmer who has a lot of thme around.

Amen Brownie, I hope he gets busted, unless he has a permit of course. But I don't think its very likely that he got a permit for or ethical to go to the river that probably isn't right next to his garden and start decimating the area coon population. Trap them by the garden, not off on some travelway where coon that don't even hit the garden run. Silly, and illegal, I hope he gets turned in.

One strand of electric fence and a cheap fencer work better, without the illegal waste of a natural resource. To the guy with the horses, [PoorWordUsage], what disease is this that is now transfered between coons and the equine species. I grew up on an Arabian farm with 21 animals and a couple summers there were reds and coons that ate out of the feed tubs, we told our vets about it and they didn't say anything, and one of them teaches at the U. Good to see you boast about your son illegally killing coons on the internet. Get the OK from the area CO and go ahead, but until then its breaking the law and wrong.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Brownie- Coons do a heck of a lot more damage than turkeys up our way anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe they do, but coon get blamed for a lot of damage turkeys and even deer do. I have know people who have had to plant their gardens twice as the turkeys dug up the seeds. I have 2 famrers who let me trap and tell me every year kill some of those turkeys will ya, but if I did that and reported it here I would get lynched, but to he** with the coon right, they are not walleyes or turkeys or deer so no one care about them besides the 5000 or so trappers in MN.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He and everyone else have a right to protect their property "without a permit" for certain "protected" animals...here's the dnr ruling on this...

Taking a nuisance animal

Nuisance animals are wildlife (not domesticated animals like dogs or cats) that cause property damage. Some animals which are normally protected by Minnesota Statute can be taken without a license or permit if they are doing damage. The animals included under this provision of Minnesota law include: mink, squirrels, rabbit, hare, raccoon, lynx, bobcat, fox, muskrat, opossum and beaver. Other unprotected birds include the English sparrow, starling, and common pigeon. All of these animals may be taken by the landowner, manager or occupant if the animal is causing property damage.

When taking protected nuisance animals, notify a Conservation Officer within 24 hours. Please refer any inquiries you may have regarding this list to the DNR Information Center. What does "taking" mean? Taking means capturing, relocating or killing a nuisance animal. This can be done in any manner except by the use of poison, artificial lights or with a motor vehicle.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gues what man there is not a garden big enough for 90 coon, so I am bettign he is not just trapping thme around his garden.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Exactly, there's no way that guy had 90 coon doing damage. I also can assure you no one in the DNR would find it even remotely acceptable that the guy is going to some river/creek that is not directly adjacent to his garden to trap these "nuisance" coon.

Also, lichen fox, I would LOVE to see someone capture,relocate or kill a LYNX under the above described provision. That would be a laugher. Where did you get that info and when was it dated.

I was also unaware that any animal could be transported live in MN. That is in direct contradiction of the trapping regulations, but I realize the actual statutes are what the laws are, not what is printed in the annual handbook.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I never even thought of those aspects John, I need to just stay over at T-man for my info and reading as some of these "outdoorsman" on here get my blood going too much. That would just be sweel if some ding bat trapped and killed a lynx, than you, me and few other guys on here would be in a world of hurt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WoW! I remeber back in the day when I had my Treeing walkers we sold coon for $40.00-$75.00 a hide for nice big prime one. Now it looks like you can't even give them away. Thats to bad. Sure had alot of goodtimes running them with the dogs. We were happy to make back gas money. The reason we ended up quiting is that in our area people became very protective of there land and since one cant control where the coon trail might lead we ended up getting shot at a few times. I decided it was time to hang it up. Good post topic. Good luck to you guys who still hunt with dogs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Could be that others cheated also.   I was relying on memory about the BMW connection and hypothesized that Mercedes would also have been a possibility.   I did say "maybe mercedes".     In any case, VW cheated on emissions for many years with the assent of the highest levels of management.     Apparently making a small diesel that runs ok and doesn't make too much pollution at an acceptable cost is really hard.
    • License what technology, this kind?        https://www.google.com/amp/www.cnbc.com/amp/2017/04/27/after-vws-record-fine-mercedes-benz-parent-daimler-could-be-next.html     "In light of the ongoing governmental information requests, inquiries and investigations, and our own internal investigation, it cannot be ruled out that the authorities might reach the conclusion that Mercedes-Benz diesel vehicles have similar functionalities," Daimler said in its newly released quarterly report. The maker first acknowledged in January that authorities had begun probing its handling of diesel emissions. That was the same month that VW agreed to settle a criminal probe by the U.S. Justice Department, a federal judge this past week approving the payment of a $2.8 billion fine. Almost 40 times the legal limit In the VW case, the mainstream German automaker rigged the software controlling two diesel engines to recognize when a vehicle was undergoing emissions tests and then adjust pollution levels. In real-world situations, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency asserted, those powerplants would produce up to 40 times the legal limit for pollutants like smog-causing oxides of nitrogen. Since the scandal broke in September 2015, regulators in the U.S. and the European Union have begun rechecking the emissions claims made by other manufacturers, including Daimler, General Motors, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles and others. In January of this year, the EPA took aim at FCA, alleging that it may have used its own, rigged software on products like the Ram 1500 EcoDiesel which "appeared to cause the vehicles to perform differently when being tested" than when in use in real-world conditions. That same month, Daimler said that what the EPA was concerned about "apparently includ(ed) functionalities that are common in diesel vehicles, as undisclosed Auxiliary Emission Control Devices (AECD)." While the German parent of both the Mercedes-Benz and Smart brands did not confirm it had broken the law, it laid open the possibility that its own diesel emissions strategy could be in trouble. "If these or other inquiries, investigations, legal actions and/or proceedings result in unfavorable findings, an unfavorable outcome or otherwise develop unfavorably, Daimler could be subject to significant monetary penalties, remediation requirements, vehicle recalls, process improvements and mitigation measures," Daimler stated.
    •   Wow, Del I forgot all about that little discussion you started two years ago.  All the fun folks were in on it, even the LIMITOUT. That's what happens when you have short term memory loss and and pictures bring on new thoughts and emotions.  Let's just call this threat the "What a dang waste and shame!" More of an aftermath threat?  K
    • When we had are seasonal campsite I had lots of squirrels. I used all metal feeders. Come Sept them squirrels went in the freezer and cooked up for the wild game feed!
    • If you have been following the story, the reason VW got in this mess is they didn't want to license technology from BMW (or maybe Mercedes) and chose to develop their own.   When it couldn't be made to work properly, they chose to cheat rather than bite the bullet.    Long discussions of what happened as the story broke    
    • I had one of those.  Mine never quite ran right, although I lived with the quirks for years.  I have a pdf of service manual if you want it.   Mine ran rough intermittently at certain rpm.
    • If they make it better because of stupid government mandates it wouldn't bother me at all.   In fact, the Dodge ram diesel that I used to have had something from Daimler Benz that allowed it to meet the standards without DEF. I would not be surprised if they did something similar with those diesels and if they did I applaud them. The best thing anyone can do with the diesel trucks is delete the emissions and unlock the power and economy that are robbed from them.   
    • pellet gun does the job here  
    • I have to many squirrels, need the feeders with the metal holes.
    • build it and they will come. 
  • Our Sponsors