Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • RECEIVE THE GIFTS MEMBERS SHARE WITH YOU HERE...THEN...CREATE SOMETHING TO ENCHANT OTHERS THAT YOU WANT TO SHARE

    You know what we all love...

    When you enchant people, you fill them with delight and yourself in return. Have Fun!!!

Sign in to follow this  
Buck_Story

What is your fishing index.....?

Recommended Posts

Ok, you know how they have a cylinder index that calculates how manly you are.... It's based on how many cylinder's you own...

I thought it would be fun for everyone to share their "Fishing Index." To determine your fishing index... Take your biggest bass, biggest walleye, and biggest muskie lengths and add them together.

My fishing index is:

Bass = 22 inches

Walleye = 33.5 inches

Muskie = 38 inches

Adam's fishing index = 93.5"

I need to work on the Muskie, it is bringing my "Fishing Index" down...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess we could substitute smallies for walleye, but it would affect your "Fishing Index."

My suggestion is that you start to fish walleye, they are by far my favorite fish to both eat and fish!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bass 23

Walleye 27.5

Muskie 48

Total 98.5

See! I knew my Muskie would bring me down, I need to get out their and catch myself a 48" muskie and my index would be set!

Nice fish man!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

why not add pike?.. Without pike I am only fair, but with pike I rule.. LOL

Bass 25(florida)

Walleye 30(rainy River)

Muskie 46"(Cass)

Index=101

Add pike 50"..

151~

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, I could use some work...

LM bass 21.5 (MN) 22 (FL)

Walleye 26", mainly just a winter fish.

Muskie 39", been putting in more time on these guys the past two years

86.5"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bass- 21

Walleye- 20

Muskie- 45

Index= 86

Not Horrible considering I can't even drive yet

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bass-22.5"

Walleye-32.5"

Muskie-53"

Index = 108"

I was irritated that my biggest northern wasn't a muskie so I never measured it. Stinking northerns!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WAAAAAA!!!!! What about Trout? We who fish only for trout should have a say or we shall gather our Izack Walton League attorneys and SUE YOU because we can.

WAAAAAA!!!!! (sound of thumbs being sucked).

The ONLY index should be:

The size of the trout in inches

Add the size of the fly

Add 10 points to the total if you caught in on private waters in Montana or Idaho

and paid over $500.00/day for the privilege.

Add another 10 points if you were wearing waders that cost over $400.00

Any other index will not count because you are an inferior person to us.

Now go away. WAAAAAA!!! I just defecated in my #38 Cortland Wet/Dry disposable diaper. Call my Illegal Immigrant Nanny to change me....NOW!!!

Sincerely,

Reginald Louis , "Skippy", Wainwright IV

Big River with Little Trout (we like it that way), MT

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bass LM- 21

Bass SM- 21 3/8

Walleye 27 1/2 through the ice, only time worth fishing 'eyes...

Muskie- 53

Pike- 40

I will sub the smallie for the green one for an index of 101 7/8

throw the snake in there and I got a 141 7/8.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya

Yeah - adding pike does wonders for mine smile

LMB: 22.5

SMB: 21

Walleye: 31

Muskie: 54

Pike: 51.25 (yay for Alaskan pike...)

179.75 with the SMB, 158.75 without. Minus the pike, 107.5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WAAAAAA!!!!! What about Trout? We who fish only for trout should have a say or we shall gather our Izack Walton League attorneys and SUE YOU because we can.

WAAAAAA!!!!! (sound of thumbs being sucked).

The ONLY index should be:

The size of the trout in inches

Add the size of the fly

Add 10 points to the total if you caught in on private waters in Montana or Idaho

and paid over $500.00/day for the privilege.

Add another 10 points if you were wearing waders that cost over $400.00

Any other index will not count because you are an inferior person to us.

Now go away. WAAAAAA!!! I just defecated in my #38 Cortland Wet/Dry disposable diaper. Call my Illegal Immigrant Nanny to change me....NOW!!!

Sincerely,

Reginald Louis , "Skippy", Wainwright IV

Big River with Little Trout (we like it that way), MT

Bwahahaha... Spitting coffee right now. that's freaking hysterical. You forgot one key thing though - native or stocker?

Man that's funny stuff. Thanks for the laugh.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lg M.Bass - 22.25

Walleye - 29.75

Muskie - 38

Index then is 90... Kinda weak but I never really target the muskie... I actually caught mine while casting a Mann's minus one. I also only really go for the eyes a couple times a year.

Other notables...

Northern 39.5 inches (17 lbs)

Smallie 19.75

Flathead Cat 45 inches (44 lbs)

Carp 32 inches & (18 lbs)

Dog fish 28 inches

Rainbow Trout 16 inches

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, if we are going to add Smallies and Pike that would harm my index as I spend most of my time fishing walleye...

Bass = 22"

Walleye = 33.5"

Muskie = 38"

Smallie = 17"

(Dumb) Northern = 35"

My adjusted index would be 145.5"

Although I feel a true Midwest Fishing Index should only be Walleye, Bass, and Muskie. As these are the most commonly fished species in the Midwest....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, if we are going to add Smallies and Pike that would harm my index as I spend most of my time fishing walleye...

Bass = 22"

Walleye = 33.5"

Muskie = 38"

Smallie = 17"

(Dumb) Northern = 35"

My adjusted index would be 145.5"

Although I feel a true Midwest Fishing Index should only be Walleye, Bass, and Muskie. As these are the most commonly fished species in the Midwest....

where did u catch that walleye? lets see a pic

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: Buck_Story
Ok, if we are going to add Smallies and Pike that would harm my index as I spend most of my time fishing walleye...

Bass = 22"

Walleye = 33.5"

Muskie = 38"

Smallie = 17"

(Dumb) Northern = 35"

My adjusted index would be 145.5"

Although I feel a true Midwest Fishing Index should only be Walleye, Bass, and Muskie. As these are the most commonly fished species in the Midwest....

where did u catch that walleye? lets see a pic

I caught that Walleye on a lake between Tower and Ely, MN. As for the photo... Our group was fishing on two separate boats, one boat was the "Mens Boat" and the other was the "Woman's boat."

Naturally none of the men in our boat had a camera...( I will never make that mistake again ) We measured the fish as we were signaling to the "Woman's Boat." By the time they got close enough to snap a passing photo we had already decided that we would throw the "Beautiful Walleye" back. Because I already had a 29.5" Walleye on the wall from that same lake.

All there is for proof is the three other guys in the boat with me and one blurry passing photo from the "Woman's Boat." I believe my step mom still has the photo, I will see if I can't get my hands on it for you guys.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

LMBass - 21 1/2" - Weaver

Walleye - 24" - ML

Muskie - 48" - Sugar

Total - 93.5

Need to work on The Walleye more than just spring maybe I can get that index up!@

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I caught that Walleye on a lake between Tower and Ely, MN. As for the photo... Our group was fishing on two separate boats, one boat was the "Mens Boat" and the other was the "Woman's boat."

Naturally none of the men in our boat had a camera...( I will never make that mistake again ) We measured the fish as we were signaling to the "Woman's Boat." By the time they got close enough to snap a passing photo we had already decided that we would throw the "Beautiful Walleye" back. Because I already had a 29.5" Walleye on the wall from that same lake.

All there is for proof is the three other guys in the boat with me and one blurry passing photo from the "Woman's Boat." I believe my step mom still has the photo, I will see if I can't get my hands on it for you guys.

bearhead?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: Buck_Story

I caught that Walleye on a lake between Tower and Ely, MN. As for the photo... Our group was fishing on two separate boats, one boat was the "Mens Boat" and the other was the "Woman's boat."

Naturally none of the men in our boat had a camera...( I will never make that mistake again ) We measured the fish as we were signaling to the "Woman's Boat." By the time they got close enough to snap a passing photo we had already decided that we would throw the "Beautiful Walleye" back. Because I already had a 29.5" Walleye on the wall from that same lake.

All there is for proof is the three other guys in the boat with me and one blurry passing photo from the "Woman's Boat." I believe my step mom still has the photo, I will see if I can't get my hands on it for you guys.

bearhead?

Not Bearhead, that is all I can divulge, my family would have me hung if I shared the spot...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • Anyone still at it?   not sure that i will get Isaac out anymore, will still ask these last few days.   Good luck everyone.
    • Haha, sounds like you have a good head on your shoulders and great perspective, Borch.  Plus, I think it's good to be upset about missing!  It motivates a guy to take more selective shots and make better shots.  My shot selection was ok, but my execution was not good.  I made a good shot at a stationary target, but the target was walking.  D-U-M, dumb!!!  Such is life!  Next year Morgan and I will shoot turkeys (as long as I can still get her out there).  
    • From what I read the idiot did not tell anybody....was asked to play in the World's and declined saying his wrists hurt so they made him go in and found the torn tendons...what a duffus.
    • It reminds me if the first year I took my son turkey hunting.  He had several close calls but didn't get a bird.  He was upset.  I said, "Why are you upset?  We got to hunt together for several days and had several exciting encounters.  If you shot one the first day we would have missed all that fun together"  He thought about it for a while and he smiled.  The older I get, the less its about the kill.  Reframing what I thought success was has added to my hunts.  Now, if I could get less upset when I miss a bird I'd have it all figured out.  
    • Excellent.  Nicely done.
    • You got it, Borch!  I was disappointed with how the season ended, but you're definitely right!  I also learned a trick this year- cards!  Morgan really enjoyed playing cards with me in the blind.  It was a good way to pass the time and we enjoyed it quite a bit.  We had a great season together and enjoyed it a ton!     That last encounter we had was really something!  I'm convinced the worst thing birds can do to a bowhunter is to come in to the deeks is stand there and stare.  I'd rather they hung up and didn't come in or did pretty much anything but that.  It makes it virtually impossible to get a bow drawn!  The turkey was at about 5 yards, because I knew we I needed one close for Morgan.  However, at five yards and staring directly in the direction of the blind, she was smart to not try to draw.  That dang bird stood there for two full minutes and didn't move a muscle.  Morgan had a smile from ear to ear and at one point told me "I was so excited and my heart was pounding so hard I thought I might die!"     It would have been a slam dunk with her crossbow, but she wanted to get one with a vertical bow.  I'm proud of her for sticking with it and she said "I'm just fine with not shooting one, Dad."  I'm glad she's ok with that.  I wish I was more ok with it...  but, that's hunting!  
    • Sounds like he is going to bring "fire" to the team haha.  Hoping he can come up with something to do with all the aging players who aren't living up to their contracts.     Also heard that Coyle played the last 2 months with torn ligaments in his wrists.  Going in for surgery.  Kind of an eye opener really, Coyle with torn wrist ligaments is better than anything they could've moved up that is healthy?  Uh oh....
    • Hey, it's all good. Morgan and you spending time together in the outdoors and getting a close encounter is what it's all about.     Sometimes the birds win and we simply run out of time.