Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
IFallsRon

Casilla up, Tolbert down; Harris "demoted"

22 posts in this topic

The Twins on Sunday called up Alexi Casilla to give him another chance to turn his season around.

Casilla homered in his only at-bat for Class AAA Rochester on Sunday and leaves with a .340 average, two homers and nine stolen bases in 40 games this season. He will replace Nick Punto at second base and bat No. 2 in the lineup.

The Twins optioned infielder Matt Tolbert to Rochester to make room for Casilla. Tolbert hit .178 in 48 games.

Twins manager Ron Gardenhire said Brendan Harris and Nick Punto would share time at shortstop as he tries to balance Harris' bat and Punto's glove in the lineup.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

just what are those pictures of that punto has of gardy in a compromising situation that he's holding over his head?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

whast the h e l l . . . Get rid of punto. he cant hit. hes a grossly overpaid player who is average at best. Harris has been doing well playing short and not a steller bat, but at least its more than what punto has. hopefully casilla finishes up the 2nd have strong at 2B and harris takes over full time at short, leaving little nicky to ride the pine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would agree to send Punto packing. He has a good glove but no bat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would agree to send Punto packing. He has a good glove but no bat.

He has a GREAT glove, that is why Gardy likes him so much. Gold Glove calliber IMO. Too bad he isn't hitting like he did last year. Seems to me he finished about .290.

I think his best role would be late innings defense. He's worth keeping around for that. We need a guy who can play just about anywhere.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With out looking there is no way he hit .290, if anyone should be sent down it should be him, why make Harris ride the pine and share time with Punto? Yikes!!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, I was wrong. Wow he hit .284

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think he should be an everyday player, but he should have a couple starts a week. If Casilla can get it done like he did last year, we can afford to have Punto's terrible bat in the lineup because of the defense he gives you. I would have rather had them spend the 8.5 million elsewhere and have Tolbert be the utility guy, but.... we got what we got!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think he should be an everyday player, but he should have a couple starts a week. If Casilla can get it done like he did last year, we can afford to have Punto's terrible bat in the lineup because of the defense he gives you. I would have rather had them spend the 8.5 million elsewhere and have Tolbert be the utility guy, but.... we got what we got!

they should play harris every day and spilt punto/casilla's playign time

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Twins manager Ron Gardenhire said Brendan Harris and Nick Punto would share time at shortstop as he tries to balance Harris' bat and Punto's glove in the lineup.

Wow...Did Gardenhire go on vacation and leave a monkey running the team? Like Sled said, Casilla and Punto should be switching off. I wish they would stop trying to justify the money they spent on Punto by playing him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Casilla and Harris should start and Punto filling in to give either a rest once and awhile. I think Punto would do best at late inning defensive replacement and pinch hitting. Either way, he won't be back next year. IMO

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not like Harris is particularly weak defensively at shortstop. I liked the Crede/Harris/Punto/Morneau infield.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On most other teams Punto would be a spot player. All the good teams have a shortstop that hits with some power. Oh I forgot we did in Bartlett but we thought Delmon would be our go to guy. WOW I think Gardy is Punto brother in law or something. Lots of guys can play defense its the one who can hit to that makes everything go. Thats why Redmond was never a starter he can't hit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Harris and Punto should both be playing and Casilla and Tolbert need to be the odd men out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On most other teams Punto would be a spot player.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1. Depending on how you look at them fielding stats show that Harris/Punto are a wash. Punto has a slightly higher range factor and Harris a higher Zone rating. So why not give the starting gig to the guy that can actually handle a bat a little bit.

2. Redmond WAS a good hitter. he has clearly lost bat speed and has become almost useless baseball wise. His best move would be as a coach. Sure you need "clubhouse guys" but he can't catch up to the pitches he used to (even last year)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree on both points. Harris hits waaaay better than Punto and I think the Twins sent the wrong catcher down.

1. Depending on how you look at them fielding stats show that Harris/Punto are a wash. Punto has a slightly higher range factor and Harris a higher Zone rating. So why not give the starting gig to the guy that can actually handle a bat a little bit.

2. Redmond WAS a good hitter. he has clearly lost bat speed and has become almost useless baseball wise. His best move would be as a coach. Sure you need "clubhouse guys" but he can't catch up to the pitches he used to (even last year)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course Punto will be back next year it's invaluable and almost unheard of to have somebody who can play all 3 infield positions at a high level at the blink of a switch.

So Redmond is useless baseball wise? Please the leave the forum now thats ludicrous!

Not enough time left on the work clock to address the rest of the non-sense...but please leave the running of a Major League Ball team to the professionals for petes sake!

Thanks Much...LMAO!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gosh I hate to agree with Sledneck but I do as they should split the time between Casilla and Punto. Seems like every other year on Puntos bat. 2 years ago 220 and last year 284. This year STILL up in the air. Save your judgements until the year is over. Could be a comeback in the 2nd half and then what would you say.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Harris has played 3 infield positions too and he can actually hit a baseball without getting an out everytime he makes contact. The Twins are better off with him starting over Punto at any infield position. Also, what are we supposed to discuss in a BASEBALL forum? People can discuss any moves they think a team should make, if you don't like it that's just too bad. Do you want us to talk about their haircuts or what jerseys they should be wearing or who has the best looking wife/girlfriend/mistress? You act as if the Twins management/front office can do no wrong, when it is quite obvious that a lot has been going wrong this season. When I posted about Minnesota teams just barely making the playoffs and a lot of fans are satisfied, you are one of those fans. On the other hand, most of us in this forum want to see a championship soon (before we lose Mauer and Morneau).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Having a bad day at work, are we?

Of course Punto will be back next year it's invaluable and almost unheard of to have somebody who can play all 3 infield positions at a high level at the blink of a switch.

So Redmond is useless baseball wise? Please the leave the forum now thats ludicrous!

Not enough time left on the work clock to address the rest of the non-sense...but please leave the running of a Major League Ball team to the professionals for petes sake!

Thanks Much...LMAO!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course Punto will be back next year it's invaluable and almost unheard of to have somebody who can play all 3 infield positions at a high level at the blink of a switch.

So Redmond is useless baseball wise? Please the leave the forum now thats ludicrous!

Not enough time left on the work clock to address the rest of the non-sense...but please leave the running of a Major League Ball team to the professionals for petes sake!

Thanks Much...LMAO!

the term used was "almost useless" and I think many will agree that his best role right now may be simply as a mentor/coaching type person. I think the wear and tear of being a catcher at this level has caught up with Mike.

When it comes right down to it, I'd venture to guess that you are right that they won't move punto any time soon but the main reason is his contract. who wants to pay that much to a utility player? Punto has his place on this team as that utility player but it's too bad they wasted so much money on him when he likely could have been signed for much less because nobody else wanted him very badly.

Oh yeah, one more thing, that crow that is waiting for you is getting awfully cold by now. For someone who likes to throw out the eating crow statements pb sure likes to go on a non meat diet right about the time it's being served to him (unless of course he didn't realize the all star game is over and cuddy was not a participant in it)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • And if the leftists get lucky at the convention?     You aren't against human rights, like income, health care, equality, LBGTQ rights, and stuff like that, right?  
    • You scale them, no?
    •   So, why bother with locks?  Honest people won't take your stuff even if the door is unlocked.   I am in the camp that I want to make it at least a little difficult for the crooks.   Especially since three people in our family have had their houses burgled and stuff taken.
    • The result right now is not good. One way or the other the toilet needs flushing
    • Mostly I talk about this with respect to the nonsense about multiple parties or no parties some on here seem so fond of.      It is all a fantasy.   Some new party could possibly take over an existing party, like Trumpism did, or even replace it like happened back in the day but in the end there will be two parties.     Perhaps a parlimentary system with multiple parties would be better than what we have, but, in my opinion, you can't get there from here.  It's like the calls for a Constitutional Convention.   Do you guys seriously think that could happen, and that the result would be good?  
    • I haven't gone up the old Grade, but do head to Outing via Emily and NE from there, and it is really nice. Hardly any roads to go across and little to no ditch riding. I have got to try the Old Grade, as I would think it is like that. We grouse and duck hunt up there now and then, but haven't lately. Great place with lots of public land and opportunity.
    •   But yet I countered with an actual study but you think your own speculative based opinion is better. OK then.     How very hypocritical.      I would end the discussion after that last statement too.
    •     I can guess it is not for humanitarian reasons.   Mexico has about had their fill of fighting the drug war for us, and are moving towards decriminalization.  If California legalizes weed, this would be enough to tip the scales in favor of decriminalization for Mexico.       For years now, Mexico has paid an extraordinarily high price in lives and social disruption for Washington’s insistence that North America’s drug problem be tackled south of the border, where the drugs are grown and transported, rather than primarily in clinics and halfway houses at home to treat the medical and psychological issues of users. Mexican President Pena Nieto.   Successive administrations, starting with President Nixon, have demanded ever-tougher border controls, aerial-spraying programs, and DEA-backed anti-“cartel” operations in Mexico. All those efforts and sacrifices have been for naught. U.S. residents currently export up to $29 billion in cash to Mexican traffickers each year to buy marijuana, cocaine, methamphetamines and heroin.   Forcing that trade underground has taken a terrible toll on Mexico in terms of violence, corruption and social upheaval. Since 2006, when President Felipe Calderón ordered his military to join the “war” on drug traffickers, Mexico has lost about 200,000 lives and 30,000 more have disappeared,dwarfing the civilian death toll in Afghanistan and Iraq over that period.   The majority of those killed and disappeared were victims of criminal organizations, but human rights organizations also report soaring rates of human rights violations, including torture and killing, committed by security forces.   The 2016 Global Peace Index, prepared by the Institute for Economics and Peace, estimates the total cost of violence in Mexico at $273 billion, or 14 percent of GDP, with no end in sight. Direct fiscal costs of fighting the war on crime were about $32 billion in 2015 alone. Yet the United States has contributed only about $2.5 billion since fiscal 2008 to Mexico’s drug war, under the so-called “Merida Initiative.” Mexico’s pain shows no signs of easing. The New York Times reported in December that Mexico suffered more than 17,000 homicides in the first 10 months of last year, the highest total since 2012. “The relapse in security has unnerved Mexico and led many to wonder whether the country is on the brink of a bloody, all-out war between criminal groups,” it said.    
    •   But In Del's defense, he only does this on things he would like to stay as is. When you are talking about legislation he is in favor of then it is the law of the land and can't be changed. When it is something that he dislikes, it can and should be changed.
  • Our Sponsors