Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Bear55

Rain=Antler Growth

9 posts in this topic

Over the years I have noticed the deer in our area (Northern Bigwoods) grow larger racks from one year to the next. When I looked back on those years It seems we have had more rain than usual. I think I have come across a couple of articles saying the same things but I wasn't able to find any on a quick search on the net. Its fairly simple I think, more rain = more young growth = more nutrition for the deer = bigger more healthier deer with larger racks.

I most years the 1.5 year old buck in our area sport small 3-6 inch spikes or forks. Older more mature deer usually have a nice spread and beams but their tines are usually fairly short, maybe 2-5 inches, some deer in the prime still grow very large racks. During the wet year the younger bucks can sport spikes and forks 7-10 inches in length while more mature deer grow that extra tine length, maybe 6-10 inches depending on the age.

It seems we have had a fairly wet June, and just this morning I stumbled upon two young bucks who had some decent growth for this time of year, a fork with 6-7 inch beams and a spike that was in the 4-5 inch range, with another month and half of antler growth those little guys could have some larger than normal head gear this fall.

So has anyone else noticed this happening during wet spring/summers and can we maybe expect some larger than normal rack this fall? I certainly hope so.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This makes sense if you think about plant growth and palatability of the forage. Plants will withhold new growth in dry conditions and deer nutrition will suffer.

I'm sure its not quite that simple in reality but an interesting observation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I read an article about the exact same thing in one of the magazines I get a couple months ago. They came to the same conclusion too more rain= more green growth= better nutrition= bigger racks. I never really even thought of that until I read that article but I guess it makes sense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i don't know how much this would affect deer in mn. i would say we usually have adequate moisture, but if it was abnormally dry, then i'd think you'd see a decline in average antler size.

this would make a lot more sense in places that are usually dry, then receive excess amounts of moisture during the growing season. texas and other plains states come to mind.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i don't know how much this would affect deer in mn. i would say we usually have adequate moisture, but if it was abnormally dry, then i'd think you'd see a decline in average antler size.

this would make a lot more sense in places that are usually dry, then receive excess amounts of moisture during the growing season. texas and other plains states come to mind.

B Amish you could be right and there are many other variables that go into growing a rack. However I'm not sure its accurate to say less rain can affect antler growth but more rain won't change anything. Most years yes we do get a good amount of rain but would more rain lead to more nutritious food for the deer to eat? Are there any farmers out there who might have a solid answer for us?

From what I have seen in the past rain fall does affect antler growth. Otherwise I'd have a hard time explaining why some years all the deer in a given area are growing larger than normal racks. Everyone keep their eyes peeled this fall and jump back to this post if you think the deer are having a better than average year rack wise.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One other very important thing I forgot to mention is the deer health coming out of the winter. If we have had an easy winter we might also see better horn growth. After a hard winter the deer put all of their energy into their body, once their body is up to par they then begin to grow their antlers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i have a hard time thinking adequate rain makes racks bigger. after last years drought, many taxidermists will tell you that they got more bigger racks than years past. unless its a dust bowl, i don't think it will affect their racks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Oh yeah, a lot of the newer 1/2 tons have frame rust issues as well.  If you want a serious off-road machine, you need to go back to the models with the straight front axles, and of course, they're getting harder to find in decent shape too.  Especially in the rust belt.  You can still find solid older trucks if you head west, young man...        
    • Just to be clear- The wrangler wasn't introduced until 87 so at least compare apples to apples and having owned ford,chevy and dodge trucks of the Wrangler era I can testify they all have issues. My 08 Ram had more frame and fender rust than my older Jeep. The Chevy's have plenty of frame issues as well. Yes. It's a concern but if you want something like this,there is no better alternative.   https://www.google.com/search?q=chevy+frame+rust+problems&client=opera&hs=Lrs&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjAnPz1kMrTAhVpw4MKHSs9B1UQ_AUICigB&biw=800&bih=381
    •   Good questions. You have 3 body style configurations to choose from.  The YJ body was made from 87-97 and that had either a 4 cyl or an inline 6. It had leaf springs and a pretty spartan interior IMO. Some serious off roaders liked the leaf springs but they rode pretty rough IMO.   I feel the 4 cyl is anemic especially with bigger tires. The 4.0 inline 6 is bulletproof, has decent torque and power and fits the Jeep about perfectly. In the YJ series the manual transmission seemed like a better option in my experience.   The TJ ran from 98-06. This version replaces leaf springs with coil over shocks. Mine is an 06 and has the dana rear with the 4.0 and auto trans. I have BFG AT KO 32x10s and on gravel they have taken out 2 side mirrors by throwing rocks at them.    I prefer the TJ series. It has better suspension and interior than the YJ while keeping the original drive train. Fuel economy pretty much sucks as you are essentially driving a brick. I probably get about 12 MPG. If they had done a diesel I would think the wrangler could get 30 but...   The JK series replaced the TJ and was a pretty radical redesign. The body is wider, the drivetrain is totally different and the interior was upgraded quite a bit as well. They went to a pentastar V6 instead of the inline 4.0. trans was upgraded as well. They also started to sell the 4 door unlimited which gives more interior space as well. The new ones are much more civilized and refined which is great for taking the top off and driving to the lake or beach. OTOH they are expensive and harder to justify taking off the top and heading into the woods to hunt or find mud. 
    • Yes, you do have to have at least a weak cell signal and battery for the GPS to work. I know that can be challenging at times in the woods.
    •   Not sure about the new V6, but the old inline 6 was bulletproof, and had a lot of low end torque, which is a desirable feature in an off-road vehicle.       Any 1/2 ton pickup truck from the 70's and early 80's in particular, had a much better frame than a Jeep.  Body panels rust in all of them.   Not saying this is a deal-breaker for a Jeep, just something to watch for, since it is a very common problem.    
    • After doing a little looking there are a lot of options to these things. Anyone know how that new V6 compares to the in line 6? Some of the stuff I would like is the bigger tires and because I would consider putting a plow on it a lower rear end gear. The Dana 44 rear axel would be nice and would want a hard and soft top. I'm in no hurry to get one so Ill wait till the right one comes around. There are a lot of them out there that never leave the tar. More options in the later models as far as transmissions to. So it also comes down to how much I want to spend on one and how late of a model to buy. Sure don't want to spend 35K on a new one.
    • Well yeah but can you name a vehicle built for off road including any domestic pickup truck that doesn't have issues with rust. Fenders, rockers, frames etc. If you play in the mud and salt you need to maintain them. UTVs are no different. Ask yourself why Polaris would put the air filter canister intake in the rear wheel well so it is sucking in the air from the dustiest area they could possibly draw it from resulting in a 4k bill when the motor grenades.    Jeeps are fun, used ones can be had at a reasonable price but by their nature you need to be careful when you purchase because if the previous owner drove them the way they were marketed then they may have some issues.   But the aftermarket has an amazing amount of mods,upgrades and accessories to make your Jeep into anything you want and because the generally go 10 years between major design changes there are a large number of parts available if you need them.     
    • Anyfish it's still points and way better than a zero for points! Congrats on the fine eating bird.
    • Pick up a Jake morning.  Not going help the team score, if at all.  But it sure will taste good.
  • Our Sponsors