Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
croixflats

Mercury in fish mabe ok maybe not.

3 posts in this topic

Fish mercury levels might not be that dangerous say researchers

by Dan Gunderson, Minnesota Public Radio

June 22, 2009

Grand Forks, N.D. — Researchers at the University of North Dakota say there's new evidence that mercury levels in fish are not as dangerous as previously thought.

Researchers at the Energy and Environmental Research Center in Grand Forks say the trace mineral selenium is just as important as the amount of mercury in fish.

Research Scientist Nick Ralston said brain damage from mercury poisoning happens when mercury depletes selenium in the body. He said if fish contain more selenium than mercury, they are safe to eat.

He wants to see a new standard for fish consumption advisories.

"I think one of the most urgent things is we have to start looking into the lake mercury-selenium ratios," Ralston said. "We have to see what the selenium health benefit values are for fish from various locations to establish which fish are safe and if there are places where fish are not safe to make sure people are very aware of that."

Ralston said it's urgent to conduct research that identifies which lakes have low levels of selenium so fish from those lakes can be identified as the most dangerous for human consumption.

He said his examination of selenium levels in fish shows most Minnesota lakes are likely to be rich in selenium, except in the northern part of the state where he believes many lakes have low selenium levels.

Minnesota's fish consumption advisory coordinator is not convinced. Patricia McCann said the new research is not definitive and will not affect how Minnesota establishes fish consumption advisories.

-

And that was after scientists from Harvard University and the Food and Drug Administration have been saying, the nutritional benefits of omega-3 fatty acids in fish – including healthy hearts and smarter babies – far outweigh the hypothetical risks associated with mercury. The levels of naturally-occurring methylmercury in ocean-caught fish are so tiny that you could probably eat a hundred cans of canned chunk light tuna every week for a lifetime without getting mercury poisoning. But they were taking what, I assume, salt water fish.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting...

I don't know exactly how the state arrives at it's fish consumption advisories, but it might take some doing for them to admit that they've just been plain wrong all these years, if, indeed, they have been... wink

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've never really worried about it. Have fish about once every two weeks. Unless someone stops by and wants some. But not often enough to worry about.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0