Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
mmeyer

I'm calibrated but I'm still having problems

9 posts in this topic

I bought a new computer a few months ago and although my monitor (an Acer LCD) is calibrated with a Huey Pro, my prints come back probably 2 stops under exposed. The colors look good but they are very dark. I cannot adjust my monitor to match them. I have tired 3 different labs including MPix and WHCC with the same results.

Please help.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mike, have you downloaded color profiles from the labs in question? They should be available for free and, once installed, you can use them in Photoshop to soft-proof. Soft-proofing will yield an on-the-screen image on a calibrated monitor as close as possible to the finished print.

Or when buying from WHCC with the ROES software, you can check the "color correction" box, which has WHCC do the color work and costs an extra $1 per file. That's what I do. I have a CRT monitor calibrated for my home inkjet printer but haven't fooled with downloading and installing WHCC profiles anymore. I did that before and liked the results, but when my old OS burned down once every two months over a six-month period and I had to keep rebuilding from scratch, I got sick of the extra steps.

So I just pay the added buck per file (not per print, but per file) and the prints always look excellent.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I second the idea to make sure you are using the printer profiles. WHCC has a few of them depending on what size and surface you print. I always softproof using that profile in CS4. I don't have mine color corrected by the lab, at 500 or so files per month that would kill my profit. Mine are very close to what I see on my monitor.

What setting are you using on the Huey? I've found better results using the Video edit and graphic design setting rather than web viewing. I think the Pro uses the same presets?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I downloaded the profiles today but they actually seem to make it worse. My monitor should be getting darker to match the print but it's actually lighter with their profile.

On the Huey, I don't recall seeing anything about Video Edit and Graphic design. Can you give me an idea of where to find that?

Thanks for your help on this. I have to order a bunch of prints for a display that I was asked to do and I don't want to have problems with them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Pro may use different software but in my system tray under the Huey icon I can click on it and one of the options is "Huey Preferences" I click on that it allows me to choose a preset. One other thought is your new monitor a wide-gaumet monitor? If it is there are only a few calibration devices that will work to get things right. I don't recall if the Huey Pro is one of them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't have mine color corrected by the lab, at 500 or so files per month that would kill my profit.

Yikes! Yep, that'd be a profit destroyer all right! I doubt I order five prints a month, let alone 500. Just not the way my business is structured, and at my rates for nature prints, color correction is less than 1 percent of the retail price.

Mike, I suggest you give WHCC a call. They have customer service reps/techs to help you through these things. While the change has occurred on your end, it's in their best interest to help you figure it out, as it means they can expect your future business. And what they help you figure out will likely work for any online lab you use.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dan, I don't know about "wide gamout". It's not a high end one,just one that came as a package with my Acer pc. I'll look more into the Huey.

Steve, that's a good idea. I'll call them up. I've only gotten my test prints so far from them but I'd like to do more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mike, that's even better. Fresh slate and all that. You can tell them you're a new customer having trouble calibrating your monitor to their printing process and ask them to help you through the steps.

Good luck, man. smile

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again everyone for the help. I emailed WHCC and unfortunately they weren't a lot of help but they did say once I got it calibrated I could reorder my test prints so I'm happy about that. I did find out though that I can adjust the monitor settings in Windows Vista more than what I can on the monitor. I found that with some help and it looks great! I'm very excited to have gotten this figured out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    •   Thats the thing, I can't find really any good pictures of one. I was given this auger a few days ago buy a guy who didn't use or want it.  He only used it once when he forgot his power auger. There is a string with a price tag on it for $89. It was sitting in his machine shed in a corner collecting dust.   I cleaned up the auger and touched it up. There was a slight ding in the auger flighting up a turn or two from the bottom. That I fixed. However,  the mounting head for the blades didn't have any of the original powder paint damaged, none had flaked off, and there was no rust spots. The blades where rusted up but not damaged. I assume if they were bent the powder paint would have expanded & flaked off. The two blade angles seem to look like they are how they should be. So I'm really kinda leaning that the blade mounts might not be bent with the way it looks.    If I look at the shaver blades from the top or bottom they look like a normal shaver blade. However, when looked at from the side they seem to have a very slight curve that matches the blade mount. Did jiffy have a design like this different from the others? So I'm confused.......what would be the odds of both the blade mount sides being bent to what looks like exact angles.......if they were bent what is the odds of both blades seeming to conform to the bends without cracking or breaking........I measured from one outside blade edge to the other and got 8in......but I know 8in augers can go from a range of 7.5in-8.5in depending on brand and other things......If the blade mount ads were bent I would think some powder paint would have flaked off.......I'll do the ice bucket trick.....was hoping someone had one or could chime in. It looks a little like a design between a flat shaver and a curved blade if it's not bent......I do really like the design if that is what it is meant to be. I just really don't know if they are bent or not bent. Confusing..... 
    • I wax every exposed part of the string. 
    • BD!!!!!!!!!!!!!! i wasnt good enough for a lakeside lot!!!!!!!!!!!
    •   Is that you, or the back of BD then?
    • well, that picture he posted?????????? that was my boat and i was part owner of that dock if that tells ya anything!!!!!!!!! yea he's been there!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    •   Ok but you told BigDave huh? Maybe he'll give it up?
    • Hi guys,   I am a beginner and just purchased a Matthew Halon bow last year.  However, I haven't waxed the bowstring and figured I should do it before this season starts.   My bowstring doesn't seem to have any colors on it showing where to avoid waxing it.    Can somebody explain or direct me to a video on where to avoid waxing on the bowstring of a Matthew Bow?  I know the part about rubbing the wax into the string good, but I am unsure which part of the bowstring to avoid waxing exactly.    Thank you. 
    • North of the cities.........................south of I Falls!!!!!!!!!!!!! west of st cloud!
    •   Come give me a north-south zone at least!
    • I am just an outsider looking in, so I have an opinion and that is all it is not fact. I have fished Mille Lacs quite a bit over the last 3-4 years.  The fishing has just gotten better. I don't know if it is because the fish really are lacking a food source or if there are just that many fish in the lake. This past Monday we were there to chase smallies. While we did do OK on the smallmouth we did happen to catch 6 walleye up on the rock in 6-12 ft. All looked fat and healthy. Seemed unusually shallow for this time of year. I don't care if this lake stays catch and release only. It is a blast catching 10-15 walleye over 20in in an afternoon. I just hope that "IF" the walleye population is on the decline that politics and special interests, including the tribes, will be able to step back and allow the lake to be managed as necessary to keep this incredible fishery alive. Just my opinion.
  • Our Sponsors