Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
herefish101

depth finder, bang for the buck

14 posts in this topic

i recently bought a boat with an older depth finder, its an interphase dc500 is this a decent unit or should i replace it? i checked on the interphase web site and found an owners manual, it has plenty of power but i've never herd of this company, any info on this unit or even the reputation of the company would be great.

so i'v decided to go with a new unit. i have an h2o to use for gps so i only need a sonar. i would like to keep the price fairly low, around the 250 dollar range, i'v checked into the hummingbirds recomended, but i'v also in my searching came across these garmin units that are in my price range and seem to offer the same or comparable power but they have color screens.are these good units or should i go hummingbird? any more advice would be great.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know the company. Go out and use it. Does it show depth and do you see fish? If it's working, why replace it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interphase has been around for a long time and made quality sounders. They have sort of gotten out of the consumer grade market and into forward scanning sonar.

128x160 pixels isn't the best resolution but it'll get the job done. If it works I'd use it or keep it for backup.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sometimes the old stuff is better. I'm not too familiar with this brand but if it works, why replace it? Or, if you want to upgrade to some fancy schmancy stuff you can still keep it and use it as back up or bow mount.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why fix what isn't broken? If it works use it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had an old Interphase on a canoe, quite a few years ago. It worked fine. The only problem was that with it's amber screen, it was next to impossible to read when the sun hit it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My last boat had on old Lowrance unit. It mostly was a depth finder but could tell you a little bit about the bottom and whether or not there were fish below. I mostly just used it to know depth and was pretty happy. I find that more electronics means more monkeying around with that stuff instead of putting my feet up, listening to some tunes, and enjoying where I am.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would say save it as a spare but go get a new one. For a few hundred bucks you can get into something much better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with keeping it as a back up. If your not looking for a GPS, check out the humminbird 535 and 565. For the money, they are a nice unit and work very well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I see you edited your post with additional info.

At one time I'd never have recommended a Bird. If you had asked me two years ago I'd have said Eagle has the best bang for the buck. They still are priced right but the dependability of Eagle and Lowrance has lost my confidence at this time. To be fair Lowrance is still up there on the leading edge and there are certainly tons of their sounders working without any hiccups.

Things change, the Birds have come a long way recently.

Definitely worth consideration IMO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

herefish101...I had the same unit, plus the Pilot Loran, in my boat for over 15 years. I replaced it last year with a Lowrance X-96 and a hand held Lowrance Expedition C GPS. There was nothing wrong with the Interphase unit, I just wanted to update.(I really miss that 8 ft. Loran antenna) I paid under $300 for the X-96, it has speed and temp. and I love it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the new Hummingbird 788c Combo is one of the best bangs for the buck on the market today.

It features a brilliant color, ultra-high resolution 640V x 640H 5" display, DualBeam PLUS sonar with 4000 Watts PTP power output, GPS Chartplotting with built-in UniMap, and advanced Fishing System capabilities. In addition, it includes dual card slots for maps and saving waypoints, as well as 3 programmable preset buttons to save your favorite views. $649.99

My next pick in the Humm'r line would be the 587ci Combo. It features a brilliant color 320V x 240H 4.5" display, Dual Beam sonar with 2400 Watts PTP power output, 16-channel internal GPS Chartplotting with built-in UniMap, a card slot for maps and saving waypoints, and a Tilt & Swivel Quick Disconnect Mounting System. The new design also allows drop-in replacement for competitive in-dash models. $469.99

A very impressive easy to use newcomer from Humm'r with an amazingly bright display is the PiranhaMAX 190c. It features a 256 color 320V x 240H 3.5" display and Single Beam sonar with 1600 Watts PTP power output. The new design also allows drop-in replacement for competitive in-dash models. $219.99

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

havent looked at locators lately but I do know that I love the x 135 thats on my boat its really powerful and has what i need for features its the strongest grayscale on the market and finds transitions really well and put fish in the boat for me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow! - I'm really dated !!!

I've been up/down the depthfinfer road to hell,

and over the years I have come to the stark realization

that there are only 2 things that matter to me - how

deep is it, and how hard is the bottom. There WAS a time

when I was taken in by all the bells/whistles that sonar

makers were touting, much as they are now touting the

"maps" thing.....folks, there ain't no MAPS detailed

enough to get you on fish as of this date....either go

there and set your own GPS points, or forget it. Some

hot walleye bars I have fished are only 20x40 feet - do

you really think these pre-programmed maps will show that?

Of course not.

Bottom line - go for POWER - the more transmit power, the

stronger is the return signal, and therefore the more

"data" your sonar has to process....maybe even displaying

fish. (Don't get hooked into the "fish-id" [PoorWordUsage] - it's

just that - [PoorWordUsage].) Learn to interpret the RAW sognal for

yourself, what is a weed, what is a rock, etc. Yes. the

old TV shows you have seen that showed "hooks" are real,

and good sonars will show them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Single payer is in our future whether we like it or not. No sense in fighting it. If the Republicans fail to do anything meaningful with health care, Democrats will fire up the base again with single payer and the Republican run will be short lived. 
    •   All politicians are narcissists, some just more than others and they also like the monetary benefits that go with the position. Trump actually stated at one time he didn't really want to be President, but he was the only one who could do the job.
    •   You might get an official "Make America Great Again" cap. (made in China, of course)      
    •   Then what? Do I get a prize? 
    •   I don't think Trump really wants the job either, and I'll put Obama, Hillary and Gary Johnson in that category too. Sure they all wanted to be president but none of them actually wanted to do the job.
    •   Why don't you show us YOURS then?
    • I was referring to the spool for the ez ducer icing up not your spools on your rods...
    • I'm in 100th place overall after three events. I always suck making picks on Toledo Bend though
    • Well another year in the books for us on Winnipeg.  We fished Thursday-Saturday, just left right away Sunday morning without fishing.  Accessed out of Warner.  Thursday access was great, but by Sunday morning, it was sloppy with some deep ruts and puddles.  Lots of trucks parked out along the road.  All water depths measured from the bottom of ice.  Water was dirty straight out from the mouth, but clear out deep and farther west.  Eagles nest was dirty at 11.5fow but clear at 12.5fow.  Seemed to be an "umbrella effect" with the dirty water and the river pushing it straight out.   Thursday- We went straight north of Warner about 4 miles and started in 17fow.  Only caught a couple, then moved east to the ridge in 19fow.  Caught a few more small ones and one guy had a 25"er.  From there we tried a few spots out deep, 22-24fow.  Very slow out deep, only caught 2-3 in the couple hours we were out there.  Mid afternoon we headed south to the ridge in 20fow, pretty slow again.  In the evening we moved back NW to the spot on the ridge we were at in the morning and had a better evening bite there.  I had a nice one get off halfway up, but other than that all smaller ones.  Every spot we tried we caught at least 1-2 fish, but it was a grind.  Ended the day with 26 fish between 4 guys but only one over 20".  Best baits were pink/silver flutter spoons and purple rattle baits.   Friday-  Started out by the ridge again in 19fow caught 5-6 in that spot.  Friday started pretty slow for us.  By the later part of the day we were on the North side of the ridge in 19.5fow, right were the ridge turned to go North.  We found better fishing about 150-200 meters off the ridge.  Ended up sitting on one smaller area for the rest of the day and did fairly well.  Ended up with close to 60 fish between 4 guys on the day, with the biggest coming right at the end, a nice 27.5"er.  Best baits were purple rattle baits.  Gold rattle baits did fairly well earlier in the day.   Saturday- We woke up early and tried in 16fow right at first light, only marked a few with no biters.  Moved out to the North side of the ridge and same thing, managed to catch a few but only after going through the whole tackle box to find something they liked.  Moved about a half mile to the east and sat in the shelters to get out of the wind until about 330.  Had a few bigger schools of fish come through, at one point 2 of the guys caught 7 fish in 5 minutes.  The bite seemed to get better as the day went on.  We moved back to the west about half a mile to where we were Friday evening.  The bite there was good and we figured out that the fish wanted blue and silver rattle baits and blue and silver spoons.  We ended up catching 20-30 fish in that one spot from 330-dark.  In that time we had a 26", 26.5", and a 27".  So if we count that 27.5" from Friday, that was 4 fish 26" or bigger out of that one little spot.     Ice was in great shape.  Travel was very easy.  Crossing the ridge on ATVs wasn't that bad at all, used the ramps to cross only 2 times and found other spots to cross without ramps.  All 3 days the bite seemed to get better as the day wore on.  Most consistent bite for us was 200pm or later in 19-20 fow on the North side of the ridge.  What the fish wanted to bite on seemed to change by the hour.   I think we will be back next year, but only 1 trip, not 2.  

    • Everyone is gouging the people.
  • Our Sponsors