Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

lighting critique please

5 posts in this topic

I'm trying to venture into the world of outdoor portrait lighting. In these shots I used a Vivitar 283 flash with a 42" silver umbrella at camera left about 45 deg to her and above her eye level. I had the flash set to the same power for all of these and only changes camera settings. Please tell me which one is the closest to what I should be going for and how I could improve it. These are straight out of camera (I think that's the first time I've ever done that smile ). Don't worry about the poses, this was strictly a lighting exercise.

For this one I metered the ambient light and had a reading of ISO400 f3.4 at 1/125 so I increased my flash to 1 stop higher at f4.8


On this one I changed to f6.7 to decrease the flash a little but I also went to 1/90 shutter speed to brighten the background a little


On this one I kept everything the same ISO400 f6.7 but set the shuuter to 1/60 to brighten up the bg a little more


Just because she wanted me to post this one smile


Thanks for the help.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Being strictly Canon,I'm not sure how the Vivitar system operates-ETTL? TTL?

The 1st looks a little washed and the others look under exposed-to my eyes.

What white balance did you run?

IMHO-uninformed as it may be- grin,you should be able to get steller results with just a good on camera flash. The new SB900 Nikon is reputed to be able to replace ALOT of studio flash gear and get the job done better-or so I've heard from the west coast podcasters who are shooting the $15,000-$25,000 weddings. Mmmmmmmmm,I'd love to get in on some of that work. cool

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

First off,what a beautiful little girl. I'm not really one to critique here but I will tell you my opinion for what it's worth. For my taste the first one has too much flash. Number 3 seems to have the most even lighting,it's my favorite. Number 2 is still nice and the last one is just adorable.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites


What kind of look are you going for? I shoot a lot of outdoor portraits for team and individual work and they are fairly simple lighting techniques very close to what you have posted. If I'm doing seniors or special sportraits I use completely different lighting with strong lighting and harsh shadows.

One of the things both normally have in common is that I prefer to darken the background to make the subject stand out. I like some form of rim lighting to again make the subject pop from the background. Outdoors you can keep it simple or you can make it complex, just like studio work.

Your first shot is closer to what I do with team and individual shots, nice darker background, good lighting with no eye socket shadows. For a more formal look you could use a piece of white foam core camera right to add just a touch of fill to the right side of the face.

Your next three shots of your subject (your lovely daughter) are considerably underexposed. Because you have shot in the shade and the flash is acting as fill you have a blue cast. Notice in the first shot with your flash doing more of the lifting you don't have as bad a color cast. A CWB is really a necessity here.

Outdoors is a great time to be using High speed flash. You will not be limited by sync speed so you will have considerably more control over your background and you can let the camera do all the heavy lifting and just ride the FEC. If you are stuck with shooting in manual (I do about 95% of the time because of fixed distances) you will have less latitude over what look you want.

Shoot me an e-mail and I will give you some good information on outdoor flash work and the relationship of ISO, aperture and shutter speed.

dbleitch at aol dot com

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the feedback guys! I have an SB800 but since I was shooting manual I just grabbed the Vivitar. It works just as well in manual, although with less adjustments. I can do the on-camera stuff in TTL but I want to get better at off-camera with multiple lights in different conditions so I'm trying to learn as much as I can.

Thanks Dan, for the info via email.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Posts

    •   My Father-in-law (a master plumber) always used to say you only need to know 3 things to be a plumber:          sh*t doesn't run uphill         payday is on Friday         the boss is an ahole      
    • I've been getting them at Costco,  I've checked slyvee and sams but never see them.  Although one of the butcher's at slyvee says he can get them which might not be a bad idea since you can have some fat cut off before you pay per #. I picked one up a couple of weeks ago and it was about 2.80 a #, which isn't too bad yet considering bacon in the store can run quite a bit more than that.  You making bacon or doing pork belly burnt ends moon lake?
    • Excellent summer fishing.  Charters catching strong numbers.  Jig/minnow or jig/leech and bouncers with spinners with crawlers or minnows still producing walleyes. When the wind is right for pulling spinners, they have been lights out.  Walleyes being caught in varying depths, 7-31' of water.  Some shallow shorelines still producing. Pike mixed in all over the lake.    Walleyes in the Rainy River with a better morning/evening bite.  Trolling cranks or pulling spinners a good idea to cover more water. Smallmouth bass are out and about along shorelines and feeder streams. Sturgeon fishing opens again Saturday, July 1st.     Up at the NW Angle, water temps are in the low to mid 60’s. Wind blown shorelines are giving up walleyes via leeches or crankbaits along the weed line. Crawlers on a  gold and/or orange spinner are producing fish out of the mud between 22 - 26 feet. On the Canadian side, bottom bouncers and spinners have been filling the livewells outside of monument bay between 24-28 feet.  Jigging near Skeet and Kennedy Islands have produced nice sized walleye and numerous perch. Great smallmouth action in Tranquil channel and the mouth of Johnston passage. Muskie fishing picking up with high 40” class fish being caught with a few 50's from shallow bottom bays or adjacent to them.
    • Busy time of year out there so if u get canceled it is hard to rebook especially with the smaller operations. Bummer though as it can be a lot of fun if they are biting. 
    • I understand that you never really know when the Warriors are going to fall off or if they even will.  Hopefully the Wolves can make the playoffs and gain some experience, maybe teach the rest of the team how to play defense, so that in a few years we are knocking on the door and can lure in a top free agent to put us over the edge.  Its just an awful tough time to be a good team right now with the Warriors so clearly heads and shoulders above everyone else.
    • I couldn't have said it better myself pikestabber!  We have to go out there and do what we can now and not try to set up for "when the warriors are old" cuz the way the NBA is going who knows what players may join forces to set up the next "Warriors" squad.  Heck maybe the Wolves will be that next team !!  I just really love the addition of Butler and from the sounds of it we are not done yet and I am excited to see what will happen in free agency and if we could really land the likes of Kyle Lowry one of the other PG's that are hitting the FA market.  Nice to see the Wolves making moves!!
    • I would ask Getanet where to get some good ones!   Pork Belly Stinks Started by Getanet, May 1
    • So that means you ALMOST caught a fish!!   Real bummer!
  • Our Sponsors