Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
311Hemi

Long line trolling?

Recommended Posts

Is long line trolling basically trolling raps at the appropriate line lengths to reach the desired depths, or is it specifically trolling cranks a longer distance from the boat than may be required to reach the max depth for a particular lure? Example you may have a lure that runs a max depth of 5' at 80 ft of line, but you are long lineing so now you run that same lure out 200' to get it far away from the boat. Or possibly both depending on who you are talking to?

Is this the same as flat line trolling?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Flatline trolling is running your baits behind the boat with nothing attached to the line ------ no planer boards or outriggers or snap weights or anything like that connected to the line.

Longline trolling is what you said, letting out more line to get farther away from the boat. It came about from clear lakes with suspended fish, where the boat spooked the fish --- guys would longline their baits to get farther away from the boat and reduce the spooking factor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So with long lining would you run a longer distance that what the trolling bible actually says to run, and decide on what lure to use based on it's max running depth? Because otherwise if your targeting a certain depth with a certain lure you would only be able to let out so much line based on how deep that lure runs. So, with one lure I might not be able to let our more than 70 feet to reach the desired depth....this example would not be long lining?

Whats the difference between flat and long lining then, because from what I understand long lining is different that running planer boards or out/down rigging. Both your running a lure a good distance from the boat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So with long lining would you run a longer distance that what the trolling bible actually says to run, and decide on what lure to use based on it's max running depth?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

from my understanding if you let your line out to much your lure will start to run higher in the water column

Not true. The bait will dive to its maximum depth as long as you have enough line out ---- if you have more than enough line the "excess line" will ride high in the water column but the bait will still dive to its maxiumum depth.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's my understanding that the more line you let out the deeper the lure goes? Lets take a (Deep Tail Dancer) They dive to 30' with 100' of line or something like that. If you let out 200' of line there is no real telling how deep it's going but only makes sence that it would continue to dive. Boat speed also plays a factor. Have I been wrongly mistaken in my thinking?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking at the trolling bible at any given speed the dive curve for line out vs running depth levels off greatly as you let out more line. With a #7 shad rap the line gets fairly level past 120 ft meaning your getting towards the max depth at that speed.

I don't have the book as of yet and haven't looked at the dive curves for deep running lures but I would assume the same principle applies?

From an article online:

Quote:
The amount of line let out is a strong influence on how deep a crankbait will dive. McClelland's book states that crankbaits will reach 90% or more of their maximum diving depth when 120 feet of lead is used. McClelland also claims that if too much line is let out the lure will actually lose depth because of excessive line drag in the water. The authors of Precision Trolling came to a different conclusion.

"Every crankbait is an individual that has its own distinctive diving curve," says Holt. "Some lures reach their maximum diving depth with 120 foot leads, but many lures, especially deep divers are just getting warmed up at 120 feet."

Holt, and Romanack experimented with lead lengths much longer than tested by McClelland. "In some cases we saw lures continuing to dive even after letting out 260 feet of line," claims Romanack. "The Luhr Jensen Powerdive Minnow is an excellent example. A lure with an extra large diving lip, the Powerdive achieved a depth of 25 feet with a 120 foot lead and 35 feet when trolled on a 260 foot lead."

"The Powerdive minnow picks up an additional 10 feet of diving depth when run on very long leads," adds Holt. "A significant depth improvement, this lure and other super deep divers are capable of reaching greater depths than we ever dreamed possible."

Ironically, not all big lipped lures turn out to be the deep divers they appear to be. The body size and buoyancy appears to have a major impact on how deep a lure will dive.

"The Rebel D-30 Spoonbill is a good example of a lure I expected to be a super deep diver," comments Romanack. "After testing the Spoonbill D-30 and learning that it only dives to 18 feet, I was sure the lure tested had to be out of tune. After testing several other D-30 Spoonbills, I finally came to the conclusion that this bait which appears to be a deep diver is actually a medium depth diving lure."

Large crankbaits with wide buoyant bodies tend to run slightly shallower than you might expect. Other big lipped lures that don't dive as deep asyou might think include the Rapala No. 9 Shad Rap and Poe's Deadeye. Although each of these lures are excellent fish producers, they don't dive as deep as other lures with similar lip sizes.

Click Here to order Precision Trolling

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't read all of this but one thing to remember when doing this type of trolling is Do not keep going in a strate line use "S" turns the lure will cut the corners and fish areas not behind the boat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • Idk if I would use the winch rope, once that gets full of salt/chloride and sand I think it will get rotten.  I've been using winch rope on atv's since it first came out so I am fairly familiar and have broken a few of them.  I want to say I've seen a house with wide straps like seat belt material but I don't remember where.  The stainless steel cables are the best option besides going full hydraulic.  If I decide to build another one it will be hydraulic.
    • I'm not sure how good your buddies and family are at darts once they have a few pops?  But you may want to move the dart board to save your flat screen!  Just say'en!.
    • Are you going to finish the bottoms of the bunks? You'll be looking at the bottoms more than the tops.You're getting close, great feeling isn't it.
    • I retract the above statement 
    • Crops are out, sloughs are frozen.  Did very well on private ground in the Ortonville area this past weekend.
    • I bought the helix 5 SI mainly for a new summer unit since i didn't have GPS in the boat and with the intention of using the GPS for the ice at a minimum.  I figured it would be so/so on the ice but it actually worked really well in graph mode.  I am still fumbling around with some of the settings.  Naturally now that the new units have arrived i wish i would have waited for the newest offerings as they look to be a bit more geared toward the ice.
    • Your review is pretty much the same as my experience with my first gen Helix 5.  As a dual purpose unit it does fairly well on the ice but its a step below the dedicated ice units out there.  I bought mine because I do a lot of fishing from canoes so wanted a portable unit and it excels at that.  The fact that it works decently on the ice was a bonus.  I do ice fish but not as often as I used to and not enough to justify the cost of a dedicated ice unit.
    • That may be.  Like I said, I’m not into football THAT much so I’m basing my opinion on my gut and seeing the Vikings perform reliably for a change. I’ve actually had personal interactions with Green when he was coaching here.  He was OK but I wasn’t in awe of him.  I guess it’s more accurate to say I’m neutral there.
    • great pictures fellas!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    • You don't have to like him but not many coaches in the history of the NFL did more than Dennis Green did. I would say he was a "good" coach.
  • Our Sponsors