Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Tinkhamtown

Minnesota combination sportsman license

31 posts in this topic

Minnesota combination sportsman hunting and fishing license for a husband and wife allows the husband to hunt and fish but the wife can only fish. If the wife wants to hunt she has to buy another license. Can the law be change so the wife can also hunt on a combination sportsman license? May be with a reduced position limit for the wife?

Thank you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The cheapest form of entertainment in MN and you want to nickel-and-dime it some more...

Could it be changed? Yes, but why?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The cheapest form of entertainment in MN and you want to nickel-and-dime it some more...

Could it be changed? Yes, but why?

cuz its for "husband and wife" why should the wife get screw out of part of it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

64 and forced into retirement at 59 ½ them nickels and dimes don’t come as easy as when I was working. Plus all my nickels and dimes seem to go toward government taxes, licenses, stamps, user fees, etc 2 boats, 3 snowmobiles, 2 canoes, 3 ATV, 2 motorcycle, motor home, 3 ice fish houses, pickup, and SUV. Hunt deer with gun and bow, ducks, geese, grouse, woodcock, pheasants, and fishing.

My wife likes to tag along once in awhile on a grouse hunt and may shoot a grouse or two and for this I need another small game license. I sure would like one license that covers all.

Tink

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How 'bout you have her buy the combination and give her the hunting rights, then you can spend the $12 or $14 bucks on YOUR small games licence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:
2 boats, 3 snowmobiles, 2 canoes, 3 ATV, 2 motorcycle, motor home, 3 ice fish houses, pickup, and SUV.

I have never heard someone with this many assets complain about a $14.00 license. I have to agree with a previous poster and say it is the best value for entertainment around.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: Berens Lake ON
The cheapest form of entertainment in MN and you want to nickel-and-dime it some more...

Could it be changed? Yes, but why?

cuz its for "husband and wife" why should the wife get screw out of part of it

The wife isn't getting "screwed" out of anything.

Combination Sports (husband hunt/fish, wife fish) is $38.50

That's two fishing licenses (2*$17) and 1 small game license ($19) = $54 worth of licenses for $38.50.

Sounds like a good deal to me.

Thank you MNDNR for offering this money-saving option for us. No complaints from me.

Tim

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why not offer another license option where the husband AND wife could both get a small game license with it? It doesn't have to be the same price as the one offered now. I would get one for the one or maybe two times my wife wants to go for a long walk and see what's out there to hunt (grouse or pheasant).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Up until last year I thought it was a combination husband and wife, where each get a fishing and hunting license. Oh well, it just meant all those years, I actually saved money not having to buy my wife a hunting license. Last year I learned the wife hunting license wasn't included, so I had to buy her a separate one. I never thought it wasn't a good deal, even without her license on it. I just thought that is what I was buying at the time, a "Husband AND Wife" combination license.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree one would think that with the name the way it is. Easy mistake.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was not complaining about $14.00 and would pay the increase. What I would like is one yearly license that covers my wife and I for all hunting, fishing and stamps so I only had to buy one and was good to go. Not keep buy a different license or stamp every time I want to do something.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:
2 boats, 3 snowmobiles, 2 canoes, 3 ATV, 2 motorcycle, motor home, 3 ice fish houses, pickup, and SUV.

I have never heard someone with this many assets complain about a $14.00 license. I have to agree with a previous poster and say it is the best value for entertainment around.

I agree, your retired and have by my count 18 different toys to play with and you're complaining. Pay the extra few bucks and enjoy your freedom.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not complaining, I was suggesting a change (and a nice easy one at that) in the law so I don't have to go in and buy so many different licenses-stamps. If I could buy all our licenses and stamps at the beginning of the year and not repeatedly have to travel some where to buy another. Sooner or latter I am going to forget and end up in trouble.

TOG The Old Guy

Tink

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope I am long gone when you guys have to go in and buy your separate winter fishing, bass, summer fishing, perch, sunfish, walleye, trout, northern, grouse, woodcock, pheasant,spearing licenses and stamps. I’ll be looking down and smiling!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope I am long gone when you guys have to go in and buy your separate perch, sunfish, walleye, trout, northern, grouse, woodcock, pheasant licenses and stamps. I’ll be looking down and smiling!

Sad thing is Tink probably isn't too far from accurate. Walleye is voluntary, for now, doesn't take a fuzzy crystal ball to see Muskie in the next few years. Panfish will probably be rolled up in a "Sportsman Validation" card Similar to what is required in Ontario now. Who knows, maybe we will be required to purchase a fedral migratory game fish stamp to fish rivers and resivoirs, After all, the fish could be crossing state lines. grin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

accruding to people up in the state office there will not be a muskie stamp due to it cost money for the stamps and there would not be enough stamps sold to make it worth its time to do so. remeber they have contest to for artist to paint these things and that is not cheap, i dont think you have to worry to much about that

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tinkhamtown,

I think the easiest solution for you and your wife would be for EACH of you to get the sportsman license, with any/all the stamps, when the license is purchased. That way you are both good to go. grin

Good fishing and hunting to you both!

Vickie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

for crying out loud...i wish i had all those toys.

you are already saving the cost of a full license. you are getting 3 licenses for the price of two. guess what? if you just buy another small game license you are still getting 4 licenses for the price of 3.

i agree there could be another option, but it takes about a minute to purchase that other license.

you can go to two movies(together-without popcorn/pop) for the price of those 4 licenses...or you can hunt/fish all year. sounds like a good deal regardless of not having the option of all 4 licenses available in a single purchase.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you all are being a little harsh here. He wasn't complaining about the price, just that if it says it's a husband and wife combo would be nice if it actually was. I can't disagree with that.

As for piling on for him having toys, well, seems to me he worked his whole life and is enjoying his retirement. Seems well deserved to me. Has nothing to do with what he's talking about.

I always thought personal attacks weren't allowed and there are a whole slew of them here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, this is what I will be doing in future.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

for crying out loud...i wish i had all those toys.

Be careful what you wish for!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It only takes a minute to buy a license for whatever you are fishing or hunting.

I believe the regs books are clear as to what you get and how much you pay. It wouldn't take much for the state to figure out how to add an additional license to the husband/wife comb. sportsman.

They seem to figure out how to tax us to the poor house with ease.

Back to the original question - yes the rules can be changed. Contact your local Representative or Senator with your request. Also, you can send suggestions to the DNR commisioner.

As for Tinks toys -- when you work all your life to take care of family a person deserves a few toys to enjoy.

Toys or whatever a person enjoys spending their hard earned dollars on is a bonus in life.

I figure when you stop enjoying toys or being a kid no matter how old you get - time for the box.

I'm sure many of us have a few toys we enjoy.

BTW my toys include - 3 vehicles - camper - My Harley - 2 dirt bikes - 3 ATVs - 2 snowmobiles - 2 boats -canoe - 2 kayaks - trailers for hauling toys - 8 x 14 wheelhouse - 3 portable ice shelters - 8 x 8 ice house on skids - more fishing and hunting equipment than I will ever use (kids and grands won't need to buy much) and a very very understanding hunting/fishing/riding wife. TYVM

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i agree with sandmannd, geez tinkhamtown was suggesting a change, not complaining about having to pay. I too, now that im freshly married wondered why the wife wasnt included on small games as well, EVEN IF it costed a little more. Mine likes walking along pheasant hunting maybe 3-4 times a year. it would just seem to make sense i dont know. Too many negative nellies in this post.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I on the other hand, don't have a problem...my wife does not hunt, so the license works ok for us.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Either I'm slackin', or the sun is rising earlier than it did last year! Didn't make it to the river until 6, but surprisingly I was still the first to arrive  walked to my normal starting spot, but once there, something told me to go out of the ordinary. So I packed away my black panther martin and put on a crayfish husky jerk. I didn't catch the trophy I desired, but I did catch some nice ones, with the biggest being about 15 inches. I ventured farther downstream than I ever had before, and wanted to keep going, but it appeared that the fishing easement ended, and I may have been on private property. I stayed in the river the entire time, but didn't want to push my luck, so I went back upstream. Caught 19 total, probably lost at least as many. Surprisingly, no brook trout though. 
    • Oh yeah, a lot of the newer 1/2 tons have frame rust issues as well.  If you want a serious off-road machine, you need to go back to the models with the straight front axles, and of course, they're getting harder to find in decent shape too.  Especially in the rust belt.  You can still find solid older trucks if you head west, young man...        
    • Just to be clear- The wrangler wasn't introduced until 87 so at least compare apples to apples and having owned ford,chevy and dodge trucks of the Wrangler era I can testify they all have issues. My 08 Ram had more frame and fender rust than my older Jeep. The Chevy's have plenty of frame issues as well. Yes. It's a concern but if you want something like this,there is no better alternative.   https://www.google.com/search?q=chevy+frame+rust+problems&client=opera&hs=Lrs&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjAnPz1kMrTAhVpw4MKHSs9B1UQ_AUICigB&biw=800&bih=381
    •   Good questions. You have 3 body style configurations to choose from.  The YJ body was made from 87-97 and that had either a 4 cyl or an inline 6. It had leaf springs and a pretty spartan interior IMO. Some serious off roaders liked the leaf springs but they rode pretty rough IMO.   I feel the 4 cyl is anemic especially with bigger tires. The 4.0 inline 6 is bulletproof, has decent torque and power and fits the Jeep about perfectly. In the YJ series the manual transmission seemed like a better option in my experience.   The TJ ran from 98-06. This version replaces leaf springs with coil over shocks. Mine is an 06 and has the dana rear with the 4.0 and auto trans. I have BFG AT KO 32x10s and on gravel they have taken out 2 side mirrors by throwing rocks at them.    I prefer the TJ series. It has better suspension and interior than the YJ while keeping the original drive train. Fuel economy pretty much sucks as you are essentially driving a brick. I probably get about 12 MPG. If they had done a diesel I would think the wrangler could get 30 but...   The JK series replaced the TJ and was a pretty radical redesign. The body is wider, the drivetrain is totally different and the interior was upgraded quite a bit as well. They went to a pentastar V6 instead of the inline 4.0. trans was upgraded as well. They also started to sell the 4 door unlimited which gives more interior space as well. The new ones are much more civilized and refined which is great for taking the top off and driving to the lake or beach. OTOH they are expensive and harder to justify taking off the top and heading into the woods to hunt or find mud. 
    • Yes, you do have to have at least a weak cell signal and battery for the GPS to work. I know that can be challenging at times in the woods.
    •   Not sure about the new V6, but the old inline 6 was bulletproof, and had a lot of low end torque, which is a desirable feature in an off-road vehicle.       Any 1/2 ton pickup truck from the 70's and early 80's in particular, had a much better frame than a Jeep.  Body panels rust in all of them.   Not saying this is a deal-breaker for a Jeep, just something to watch for, since it is a very common problem.    
    • After doing a little looking there are a lot of options to these things. Anyone know how that new V6 compares to the in line 6? Some of the stuff I would like is the bigger tires and because I would consider putting a plow on it a lower rear end gear. The Dana 44 rear axel would be nice and would want a hard and soft top. I'm in no hurry to get one so Ill wait till the right one comes around. There are a lot of them out there that never leave the tar. More options in the later models as far as transmissions to. So it also comes down to how much I want to spend on one and how late of a model to buy. Sure don't want to spend 35K on a new one.
    • Well yeah but can you name a vehicle built for off road including any domestic pickup truck that doesn't have issues with rust. Fenders, rockers, frames etc. If you play in the mud and salt you need to maintain them. UTVs are no different. Ask yourself why Polaris would put the air filter canister intake in the rear wheel well so it is sucking in the air from the dustiest area they could possibly draw it from resulting in a 4k bill when the motor grenades.    Jeeps are fun, used ones can be had at a reasonable price but by their nature you need to be careful when you purchase because if the previous owner drove them the way they were marketed then they may have some issues.   But the aftermarket has an amazing amount of mods,upgrades and accessories to make your Jeep into anything you want and because the generally go 10 years between major design changes there are a large number of parts available if you need them.     
    • Anyfish it's still points and way better than a zero for points! Congrats on the fine eating bird.
  • Our Sponsors