Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
jkrash

FL8 slt question

17 posts in this topic

Try this
turn off the IR on one unit by pushing the gain button, then try to knock out the interference by pushing the IR button on the other unit.
Some times this works but if your fishing close together and in deep water you might still have problems.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe I should understand my units functions better. To be clear, pushing the gain button once resets the ir? Pushing the ir butoon once lights the led and engages the IR? I was under the impression that pushing the gain caused the signal frequency to change a little to end the interference, is that correct? I thought you could push it up to 10 times to get 10 unique frequencies?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I may be wrong but

When you push the gain button you turn the IR feature off

When you push the IR button you change frequencies.

[This message has been edited by jkrash (edited 11-20-2002).]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On the FL8SLT push the I.R. Button to turn it on and then push your gain button in to change the pulse rate. If it does not clear keep pushing the gain to you hearts content. To be honest with you the IR button is freaking joke. I loved fishing next to FL-8's and scrambling them with my colorpoint.
Hopefully my new MarCum LX-3 will have an I.R. that works it has 6 frequency variances I just hope one of them truly works. I can't wait to test this new unit. If you guys are still on the fence about the FL-18 because of the problems they had with it. Keep an eye open for my test posts for the MarCum LX-3. If this unit does what it says Vexilar will be scrambling for an overhaul...
If you fish suspended crappie this unit will be the cat's meow let me explain further...

Say your fishing in 30' of water and you see crappies at 22' with the FL-18 in the zoom mode you will only see the bottom 6', which is not gonna help you... According to the manual on the MarCum LX-3 you have a 5' or a 10' zoom window and you can adjust it to any depth you wan't. That mean's that you can adjust it to read 20' to 25' or 17' to 27'... Now think about that the zoom is adjustable for the entire water column. That's huge!!! if you fish suspended species like crappies and lake trout.

The 2003 In-Fisherman Ice guide says that the MarCum has an 18 degree transducer that is incorrect it is a 20 degree. Competition to be the best flasher is a good thing and I am open minded I own an FL8SLT, Colorpoint and now a MarCum LX-3. Vexilar and Colorpoint are both quality unit's. I used my FL8SLT for shallow water applications and it performed admirably for bluegills and crappies in water less than 20'. But as I said earlier the IR was a joke. But if I had to go deeper especially fishing for perch and walleyes the Colorpoint hands down worked better not just because of the target seperation which was a big factor but the crisp clean lines on the display that was Colorpoints signature. Vexilar knew they had a problem with there display, that's why you saw guys with coffee cans, lense magnifiers, etc. I never had to squint for a wavery red line to know that a fish was down tight to the bottom like I would with my FL8SLT.
If this IR works on the new MarCum it would be like providing military technology for the combat ice fisherman. Think about that when your hammering fish and some yo yo cut's in on you which happens more and more often. You will be laughing as you watch this guy cussing at his flasher because he can't see anything.

I remember the first Colorpoint I had and I had major problems with it but I got a new transducer and battery and it took care of everything.

I work for the Department of Defese and I know that MarCum is a respected leader in Military Technology. MarCum bought the rights back from Colorpoint to improve what they started and give us the technology we need as serious ice fisherman. Now all I have to see is if the proof is in the pudding.

They didn't mess around with the power supply for the new MarCum either they put a PowerSonic battery in "These babies don't quit" it with a digital readout that you can see through there soft pack on top of the battery which enables you to know without pushing a button and holding it in to get instantaneous battery status, i.e. 100%, 90% and so on. No more taking a battery out to charge it either they supplied a fully automatic charger that has one connection in to the digital charger that's on the top of the battery, no morefumblig with clips... Which enables you to plug it in and walk away. It charges at 1 amp not .5 which means a quicker recovery for your battery. The one draw back is the power consumption this baby really sucks up the juice 23 -24 hours of performance max before it needs to be recharged.
Look for my test post's guys on this unit. This MarCum could be the new ice leader if it lives up to it's hype...if not I will let you now that too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's some pretty good reading Tim...

Now you have me wanting to try a MarCum smile.gif

See how you are grin.gif

Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey guys, my buddy and I both use fl8 slt's but when we try to fish together we get bad iterference and have to shut 1 off. Is that supposed to happen? He has the IR button pushed so the led lights up? Is there something we should be doing?
Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If he pushes in the gain button it should reset the IR. After you do that try pushing the IR and gain button until the signals are somewhat steady. It might be hard to eliminate all interference but I've fished with friends in the past that had Vexilar's and it worked for most of the interference.

Good Fishin, Matt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I do not agree the Vexilar SLT (IR) function is ineffective if tuning out non compatible frequency distortions.

In the past I have been able to tune out distortions produced by disruptive Zercom units in close proximity of my Vexilar with the (IR). The Zercom was not so lucky, it had signal distortions and false ghost readings from the Vexilar.

The MarCum LX-3 has some good features and it will give Vexilar a run for the market share. The reports I get so far on the MarCum LX-3 have been positive for the most part, lets see how they hold up in 2002-2003.

------------------
Backwater Eddy..><sUMo>

Backwater Guiding
"Ed on the RED"
(701)-281-2300
backwtr1@msn.com
http://ed-carlson.fishingbuddy.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys. Does anybody know how many pulse rates are availible on the fL8 slt? I thought I read somewhere that the FL18 had 10.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have fished with a old si-tex right next to a vexilar and no problems. I guess it must just be easier for me to read threw the clutter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Backwater Eddy - Your right... fishing deep water with vexilars close by I had problems with interference from other units with my colorpoint but in shallow water it was never a problem. We did some testing on the FL8SLT 's with a few of my buddies last season on a perch/walleye lake in 29' of water we intially wanted to fish in tight but we were forced to spread out a little to not have any conflicts with our FL8SLT signals. At the time we were close in all using FL8SLT's we tried different variance's of the frequency of the IR and without it and we still had that nasty roll or that migrating clockwise flicker. That's when we knew it was a hoax. After we spread out a little bit things were fine. I am independent and on my own I have no allegiance to any unit. I am just intrigued to find out which unit will be the best of the best. It makes for great conversation too. I will be honest with you Vexilar has a solid product and always has and it's not easy for a new comer to come in and knock off the top dog but you gotta admit it makes things interesting....

[This message has been edited by CNY Tim (edited 11-21-2002).]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can also get signal distortion from "rigging" signals (Ice distortion). This will happen when the transducer is not set far enough down a ice hole.

Several units close together on very hard bottom may cause distortion of the signal as well. I have never seen 2 properly functioning Vexilars interfere with each others signal, sorta odd?

You can often see wacky readings when your fishing by another Vex with a poor transducer, I seen that one myself. Turned out I had a bad crystal and needed to replace my transducer.

I fished with a Vex rep once and he gave me a very interesting on ice lecture of all this frequency junk. Most of it was way over my head, I nodded a lot. smile.gif

------------------
Backwater Eddy..><sUMo>

Backwater Guiding
"Ed on the RED"
(701)-281-2300
backwtr1@msn.com
http://ed-carlson.fishingbuddy.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Backwater Eddy - I know.. alot of variables and a lot of different situations. There sensitive units and we treat em the best we can but accidents happen, maybe one of em had a bad crystal, hhhmmm. Thanks for the info.
I'm no expert either and yes if I was there with you guys I would have done a lot of nodding myself... Now if we could just get some ice here in NY State....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm looking forward to hearing more as I am considering the Vexilar or MarCum
(don't tell the wife, I'll tell her some crazed lunitic of a salesman gave it to me......Yes.. thats it, he gave it to me)
Dave

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

NY? Now we have to discount everything you said! J/k Ed and others when you are fishing with another sl8 in close, do you both turn on the ir or just 1 unit also do you both change pulse rates or leave one and change the other?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

DaveHastingsMI : Are you sure your wife and my wife aren't sisters, LOL. It's worse than getting your teeth yanked, even mentioning new gear to my wife is taboo. I'm tapped out...

bigeyes : Would it make a difference if I told you I was born and raised in western Massachusetts and the military transplated me here... Fact is I love central New York and the fishing here is fantastic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All you need with a Vexilar to get a bad signal from other units is a scratched up transducer bottom. Mine got really bad from checking depth through the ice. My buddies Clearwater used to really bug my Vex up, I bought a new transducer, now no trouble. It's possible something else was wrong but it worked well while fishing alone. We usually fish within 8ft of each other in a fish house with no trouble with depths up to 40ft of soft bottom and 30ft of rock. Often you can see the other guys lure on your flasher.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • I guess the one positive regarding this Carrier deal is at least, of what I've seen from watching some of them, the press starting to question government involvement in  private enterprise and cronyism.   It only took them eight years but better late than never, I guess.
    • They're made by NGP, an industrial producer in Ningbo, China. Good luck getting service or parts on that, is all I'll say. I know all the other augers engines, etc, are made in China, but they also have been around for years with an established company, which is a huge difference. I'd be real cautious...
    • I use 100 pound power pro braid never had any issues with it.
    • I've been looking into them.   I believe 33 is a typo.
    • Old fashioned black Dacron musky line. Durable tough  Have thought of trying  50 or 100lb flouro but knots are hard to do in it then you have to use crimps etc more point to fail. Interested to see what others do.   Mwal
    • I kinda wish Parise would have opted for the surgery this offseason and miss the first month or so, rather than to rehab it.  Its starting to show.
    • Here is good overview article that might be interesting...   https://www.dgif.virginia.gov/wildlife/diseases/cwd/science-behind-cwd-management/   The Science Behind CWD Management Why Manage CWD? Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) has the potential to negatively impact deer herds wherever the disease occurs. CWD is always fatal and while there have only been 13 cases detected in Virginia, as of February 2016, CWD could have serious negative impacts on the state’s deer population if it became established and widely prevalent (Almberg et al. 2011). CWD infection decreases deer survival odds and lowers total life expectancy (Miller et al. 2008). If a large percentage of the population were to become infected there could be negative impacts for the population, including: A decline in doe survival, which results in an overall reduced population (Gross and Miller 2001); Fewer older bucks, as male animals are more likely to be infected due to specific male social and behavioral tendencies (Miller et al. 2008, Jennelle et al. 2014); and An overall decline in population (Gross and Miller 2001, Almberg et al. 2011), as exhibited in Colorado. In the area of Colorado with highest CWD prevalence, mule deer numbers have plummeted by 45%, in spite of good habitat and protection from human hunting (Miller et al. 2008). DGIF is concerned about the impact CWD could have on Virginia’s deer herd; once CWD has become well established in an area, its persistence in the environment makes eradication extremely difficult, if not impossible. Taking action to keep the percentage of infected animals low helps to prevent (or at least slow) the spread of CWD to new areas, and also helps to slow the transmission of the disease between individuals. Understanding the Spread of CWD CWD prions, which are the infectious proteins that cause the disease, are found in saliva, urine, feces, and blood (Mathiason et al. 2006, Mathiason et al. 2009). They can persist for years outside the body, in soil and in other substances, and can be transmitted by animals that are not yet showing symptoms of the disease (Miller et al. 2004, Mathiason et al. 2009). Halting or slowing the spread of CWD is therefore a matter of reducing transmission between deer and making deer less likely to pick up prions from the environment (Mathiason et al. 2009, Grear et al. 2010, Storm et al. 2013). Differences in behavior make tracking the spread of CWD different between does and bucks and between younger and older adults. Bucks are more likely to become infected, for reasons that are not well understood (Grear et al. 2006, Miller et al. 2008, Jennelle et al. 2014). Higher CWD prevalence is found in older age classes of bucks (Grear et al 2006). Adult bucks make long excursions outside their home range, bringing them into contact with a wider area and more individual deer (Karns 2011). Young bucks are more likely to disperse from their mother’s home range and can cover many kilometers, thereby potentially spreading the disease across the landscape (McCoy et al. 2005). Young bucks infected with CWD may not be indicative of established CWD presence at the location they were killed because the buck may have been traveling. Does are relatively sedentary, usually spending their lives near their place of birth and with a related social group. Does only rarely make excursions (Kolodzinski et al. 2009, Miller et al. 2010, Grear et al. 2010). Locations where infected does are found are likely to be a source of further infected deer (Grear et al. 2010, Magel et al. 2013). An infected doe suggests that CWD is established in the population where that doe was killed (Grear et al. 2010, Magel et al. 2013). Of Virginia’s thirteen infected deer (as of February 2016), just four were does. Of the nine infected bucks, seven were harvested within just a few miles of the does, suggesting a small cluster of infection. The last two bucks were killed several miles from the cluster. The fact that these two outliers were young bucks makes it likely, though not certain, that these individuals were on the move, dispersing from their birth places. Managing CWD Due to the nature of the prions which cause CWD (please see the What Are Prions page for more information), treatment of diseased animals is not an option. Research suggests that there is some hope of managing CWD, and that the best methods available are: Decreasing transmission opportunity by:Lowering the density of the deer population A lower density population surrounding a location of known infection reduces the chances of deer picking up CWD prions from the environment, or from each other. Research indicates that indirect transmission is just as important as animal-to-animal transmission (Storm et al. 2013). Population reduction could reduce contacts between infected and susceptible individuals and consequently reduce the disease transmission rate. Analysis of spatial data indicates that CWD is clustered on the landscape, from which one could infer that deer near CWD-positive deer are more likely to be infected (Joly et al. 2003.) Earn-a-Buck, currently in effect in Frederick, Warren, and Clarke Counties (the cluster of infected deer is located in Frederick County), is designed to reduce the overall deer population by focusing more hunting pressure on the female segment of the population. Banning feeding or baiting of deer in areas with CWD CWD prions can be found in saliva (Mathiason et al. 2009), and feed or bait piles are excellent modalities to transfer saliva between deer. Feed and bite piles also artificially congregate deer, thereby facilitating transmission through urine and feces. Prevent the introduction of CWD prions into new areas: VDGIF prohibits the movement of deer carcasses out of the CWD Containment Area until after they have been processed according to guidelines described in Transporting Carcasses Within and Out of the Containment Area. VDGIF prohibits the transport of carcasses from states/provinces listed as CWD Carcass Restriction Zones into Virginia unless they have already been processed according to these guidelines. VDGIF prohibits the possession and use of attractants made from real deer urine or other natural body fluids from deer while afield. CWD prions may be found in the urine of infected deer even if the deer is not showing symptoms (John et al. 2013). There is no live animal test for CWD that is approved by the USDA, therefore deer farms producing and bottling urine cannot guarantee that they are collecting urine from healthy animals. There is no economically viable way to test urine for CWD after collection. Doing nothing to manage CWD is not a satisfactory option, as shown by a number of studies that have examined hunters’ attitudes toward current and potential strategies for managing CWD (Vaske 2010). Among hunters in most states and studies, (a) testing harvested animals for CWD and using hunters to reduce herds in CWD areas were acceptable strategies, (b) agencies taking no action and allowing CWD to take its natural course were considered unacceptable, and (c) using agency staff to reduce herds in CWD areas was controversial. Hunters also generally supported efforts to minimize spread of CWD and eliminate the disease from animal herds (Vaske 2010). A VDGIF survey conducted following the discovery of CWD in Frederick County in 2009 concluded that respondents supported five of seven potential strategies to control CWD in affected areas, including mandatory disease testing of hunter-killed deer, deer feeding prohibitions, deer carcass movement restrictions, restrictions on deer rehabilitation, and reduction of deer populations using hunters (VDGIF 2010, unpublished data). Respondents did not support the use of sharpshooting to reduce localized deer populations (42% opposed, 36% supported, 22% were neutral), but the strongest opposition was recorded for the option that described a complete lack of effort or attempt to manage CWD (79 % opposed, 8% supported).   (the references are at the link and appear to all be from various scientific type journals)
    • The recount effort underway in Wisconsin is turning out to have some disappointing results for former Green Party nominee Jill Stein and former Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton. By the end of the fifth day, and after more than 1 million votes were recounted, Trump grew his lead by just over two dozen votes.     Meanwhile in Pennsylvania, Clinton has only gained five votes after the state’s two largest counties completed their recount.     
    • It turns out that there haven't been many studies of long term impact of cwd, that I could find.    Here is a write up about one of them, from Wyoming.    http://www.wyofile.com/study-chronic-wasting-disease-kills-19-deer-annually/ and this one... http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0161127 Chronic Wasting Disease Drives Population Decline of White-Tailed Deer David R. Edmunds , Matthew J. Kauffman, Brant A. Schumaker, Frederick G. Lindzey, Walter E. Cook, Terry J. Kreeger, Ronald G. Grogan, Todd E. Cornish      
    • I use a thin super-line/braid. That said,  a friend of mine swears by mono in really clear water and I've sat with him and seen a lot of wary fish that still get close enough to ruin their day. Not sure if it matters or not... I just like the assurance of braid.
  • Our Sponsors