Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
311Hemi

70-200 or Macro lens?

5 posts in this topic

I am looking for ideas on the best course of action. We currently have a 70-200 f2.8L and the wife is wanting to do some closer shots of flowers/foods and such which we can't achieve with the 70-200 and it's focus range.

Is an extension tube something that would help in this situation, or are we better off just going with a macro lens?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would definitely go with an extension tube set. The 70-200 f2.8 is a great lens and it will take great macro shots with it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can surely try extension tubes. I've found that they really make your working distance small though. I shoot mainly macros of insects and you need at least a foot or so to not spook them, and with extension tubes you might need to be literally within an inch for an in focus shot. This also makes lighting a problem. I'm not sure what your working distance would be with a 70-200mm, but I bet it's very close, around an inch, referring to this site.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would agree with Sanka but with any macro lens you're going to get reduced working distances. That is the nature of the beast unless you want to spend $1000 or more on a 200mm or more macro. I have a 105mm macro and the minimum working distance is around 8 inches I believe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Working distance is only an issue for shy bugs/butterflies, generally. For those who do a lot of that, a 200mm length macro makes a big difference. For the rest of us it does not matter much.

I second the tubes. I have the set of Kenko's best tubes, which runs about $160. While I have the Canon 100 f2.8 macro, and use the tubes on it sometimes when I REALLY want to get close, I also use them occasionally on my Canon 200mm f2.8L (non macro), which turns that 200mm into one mean macro wannabe.

The 70-200 will work beautifully with them. When using tubes, distant focus capability is lost. You don't have to use all three all the time, either, but can mix and match them to get just the added closeup capability needed for each situation. There is some light falloff when using the tubes, so you sometimes have to adjust using manual settings or exposure compensation, which is generally not a problem in a macro setting.

A Canon 1.4 TC is somewhat more expensive at a bit under $300, but also will give your 70-200 added muscle for closeup work. And of course it has the advantage of delivering nearly 300mm for other applications. With the TC you don't get any ability to focus closer than the MFD, just a power boost. And the TC turns the 70-200 into an excellent butterfly lens.

Canon also makes closeup lens magnifiers that you screw onto the lens filter threads. The quality is excellent, though both times I've used them the images were a bit soft around the periphery, so if you go that route you might want to adjust compositions so you can crop out the very slightly soft edges. Like the TC, they add magnification and maintain MFD, but like with the tubes, distant focus capability is lost.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Not necessarily. Depends on circumstances. That one most definitely would be, though. No use debating, though.      You guys would make me walk out first, wouldn't ya?      O this stupid merge junk....$#@! son of a 
    • Maybe she needs to start a foundation..
    • mysnopro all of us that Ice fish feel very badly that this person died and know that we could be next since ice is never safe. I guess we just try and find away to move on and get through these times and some humor is a good way to heal. Not really making fun of someone we don't even really know. Just trying to get passed the hurt.     Jim, I have a lot of relatives that are Native and they are going to bust a gut laughing when I post this on FB to them knowing I ice fish so much.
    • Well, since the real cold is starting and trapping takes a lot of time and effort maybe you could just hold off until next year. Do some more research on the species you want to trap,  the market for their hides and consider the work involved in doing a perfect job of skinning and stretching skins. Then too,   in today's world a guy has to be extremely careful about placing traps where someones cat or dog ends up in the trap. Seeing a nice Brittany crushed and frozen in one of your traps will probably change your mind about the like of a trapper. Many outdoorsmen do some trapping when they are younger and most of them find other pursuits soon enough.  Of course there ARE serious trappers who work at it hard every season. Some thoughts.
    • Not to get technical, but after 1 hr lost person water emergencies are considered recoveries and not rescues...    
    • They say you can't fix stupid, but technically speaking, that is not always correct.
    • So tell me,  did the gather any significant intelligence from her account?  Or was it the same rambling scrambled nonsense she has been babbling at her last several public appearances. Got a quick note from a guy a week or so back who was in the audience at some function where she was speaking and he said "nobody in here can figure out what she's talking about and and the subject seems to change every few minutes. It's a hoot!"
    • nope but very interesting to say the least
    • Have you ever seen this? What do you think?    
    • 4chan did it. Well, not really hacked. The security question for her email was "what elementary school did you attend", which anyone could google because she is famous. So someone just used password recovery and took her account.   The DNC hacking was coordinated phishing, still a simple attack, but not quite as easy to pull off by just any old soul.
  • Our Sponsors