Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
mainbutter

cut bait regulations clarification plz!

13 posts in this topic

So the fishing regulations state that no whole or parts of goldfish, carp, or game fish are legal to use for bait.

My problem is I cannot find a definition for "game fish".. Anyone want to help me out here?

What I have figured out so far -

There IS a definition for rough fish:

Quote:
Carp, buffalo, sucker, sheepshead, bowfin, burbot, cisco, gar, goldeye, and bullhead.

Does that mean that all other species are game fish? There also is a DIFFERENT definition for "under-utilized fish":

Quote:
Under-utilized fish– Carp, buffalo, sucker, sheepshead, bowfin, burbot, cisco, gar, goldeye, and redhorse.

So bullhead is a rough fish, but not under-utilized(has a limit), and redhorse is under-utilized but not a rough fish.

Does this make redhorse a game fish, and not legal to use for cut bait?

If there is a definition for game fish which is not simply "not a rough fish" please fill me in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you can use bullheads and redhorse for cutbait

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just as a point of clarification: Bullheads over 7 inches and a suckers over 12 inches are rough fish. As rough fish it is illegal to transport them alive.

Bullheads under 7 inches and suckers under 12 inches are minnows. It is legal to transport minnows alive as long as they have not been harvested from infested waters.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One loop hole I found is technically you can transport live fish, just not in a manor the DNR says is against the law:

From page 10 of the DNR regs:

Transporting Fish

Except while on the body of water where taken, live fish may not be

transported in a quantity of water sufficient to keep them alive unless the

fish are bait minnows or the person is authorized to do so by the DNR.

I assume this pertains to people who have live fish at the launch and drain their live well. They will still be alive but you will be legal when bringing them home.

One thing to think about when transporting large rough fish for cutting up and freezing when getting home wink

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Where do channel cats fall in with the regulations? Are channel cats legal to use for cut bait(not that I want to)? Most Minnesotans from what I understand wouldn't call cats "game fish".

I'm just confused since there isn't a good definition of "game fish" as far as MN regs are concerned.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

flats and channels are game fish

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm just confused since there isn't a good definition of "game fish" as far as MN regs are concerned.

Your rough fish list did not include all the species: Page 59, 2009 Minnesota Fishing Regulations - Rough fish are defined as carp, buffalo, sucker, redhorse, sheepshead, bowfin, burbot (eelpout), cisco (tullibee), gar, mooneye, and bullhead.

The regulations are pretty confusing but in this instance it seems pretty simple to me. There are two categories of fish - "game fish" and "rough fish". Don't confuse the under-utilized with anything. If you look at the under-utilized list it is the rough fish list anyway.

Don't go looking for a list of game fish - To keep it simple, if it is not a rough fish it is a game fish. So as long as you are using a rough fish for cut bait you are legal except for carp or goldfish. As the regulation states: Page 9, 2009 Minnesota Fishing Regulations - Using whole or parts of game fish, goldfish, or carp for bait is unlawful.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Most Minnesotans from what I understand wouldn't call cats "game fish".

Those are the ones who have never caught one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone know why it is unlawful to use carp as bait???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Those things can reanimate like worms. Every piece of cutbait = 1 new carp.

Sorry......I have wondered this too, but my guess is that normally you are transporting a live fish to use as cutbait. Then there is always the chance a live carp could end up in the water.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ya its cause you transport them live and then you always have left over fish and people end up dumping them back into the water

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: mainbutter
I'm just confused since there isn't a good definition of "game fish" as far as MN regs are concerned.

Your rough fish list did not include all the species: Page 59, 2009 Minnesota Fishing Regulations - Rough fish are defined as carp, buffalo, sucker, redhorse, sheepshead, bowfin, burbot (eelpout), cisco (tullibee), gar, mooneye, and bullhead.

The regulations are pretty confusing but in this instance it seems pretty simple to me. There are two categories of fish - "game fish" and "rough fish". Don't confuse the under-utilized with anything. If you look at the under-utilized list it is the rough fish list anyway.

Don't go looking for a list of game fish - To keep it simple, if it is not a rough fish it is a game fish. So as long as you are using a rough fish for cut bait you are legal except for carp or goldfish. As the regulation states: Page 9, 2009 Minnesota Fishing Regulations - Using whole or parts of game fish, goldfish, or carp for bait is unlawful.

Thanks for the clarification.

When listing rough fish, I was quoting the "rough fish" definition on p.3 of the 2009 regs, which is DIFFERENT than what they say on p.59, which I missed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Those things can reanimate like worms. Every piece of cutbait = 1 new carp.quote]

LMAO!!!!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Check out the 2017 Obsession Hurcan 366fps and 3.9 lbs!
    •   When someone gets to the personal aspect, whether it's me or someone else, I will challenge them and if they can justify what they have said about an individual --OK -- otherwise show me why, and if it is just their opinion say so. I'll accept that if it's their opinion.   There is nothing generic about an insult, an insult is an insult. What do you consider as a douchebag?
    • Not sure why people get so worked up about being called dummies, poopyheads and sons of bees.  Whatever, its generic insults and this is the internet.   But yeah, there's a line somewhere in the there that separates the real douchebags* from the rest of us.  You know it when you see it.   *Sorry if any douchebags felt personally attacked by being called douchebags.
    • I was addressing it to JigSawJimmy Peatmoss  response : That's an opinion, not anything more , so I let it go.
    • Created/Saved all these jobs, cut gajillions off AF1 costs, etc.  Ok, so how did the that work?  Usually these sort of dealings aren't totally one sided.  At least the carrier deal had a bunch of Pence fingerprints on tax incentives Trump took credit for.   I have doubts that King Cheeto just shows up and blows a bunch of smoke up assses and corporate executives are just like, "Yay!"   Is Trump's Twitter bully pulpit that powerful?  He randomly yells at Boeing and they just fold over for him?  I thought we realized Trump on Twitter is only for the LOLs.
    • Well hope the Trump supporters are having fun, seems those days are numbered. Turns out you can't just yell fake news at real news and make it go away. The Feds are closing in, and at best it seems Trump thinks throwing Manafort to the wolves might get them off his tail. Anywho, lots of news today.   The FBI has information that indicates associates of President Donald Trump communicated with suspected Russian operatives to possibly coordinate the release of information damaging to Hillary Clinton's campaign   McCain: Congress doesn't have 'credibility' to handle Russia probes    Because this happened - House Intelligence chair discloses classified intel in clumsy effort to validate Trump   Also this earlier in the day -  Former campaign manager Paul Manafort secretly worked for a Russian billionaire with a plan to "greatly benefit the Putin Government."     And in completely unrelated news - remember those Carrier jobs you bragged about Trump saving? Yeah, those jobs are gone. Carrier pocketed the tax breaks then screwed the workers anyway. Great negotiation there. http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/job-cuts-endure-at-indiana-factories-despite-trump-pressure-416511193.html
    •   Who are you addressing this to? I did not make the statement only re-posted it. I also don't find PEATMOSS's comment very humorous as well.   PEATMOSS said: This is still, by far, the funniest thing I have ever read on these threads in a decade.
    •   Anything you post on here from now on has no merit or credibility as far as I'm  concerned.  I wasn't even going to respond to this, but feel what you posted needed to be. If you wish to call my mother a dam, you will, the same as you called another persons mother that. I don't give a rats butt what your political views are, however when you start getting into personal attacks you had better look in a mirror. You don't probably don't know anyone on here personally, yet you attack someone on a personal bases, call there mother a dam and ridicule them because they had a lower portion of a leg amputated due to something they can control, but had no control whether they have the illness and sometime that illness makes you pay a price. BD2 has that illness he can control to a certain extent where he can lead a normal life, however there will be complications and from what I know of him he will accept that. I don't know DB2 personally, I've never met him, I've debated against some thing on this where he and I have had different views, I respect his opinions even though I disagree on many, BUT I SURE AS H--- DON"T ATTACK HIS ANCESTORY OR  ANY TYPE OF DISABILLITY
    • Yea yea all ya auld pharts would  pass out the minute she popped the first button!!
    • Would he get a free hoodie for his efforts?
  • Our Sponsors