Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Scott K

Williams wall

58 posts in this topic

A U.S. District judge handed down no ruling in Vikings DT Kevin and Pat Williams' case against the NFL's StarCaps-related suspension Thursday.

The judge gave no timetable for a ruling after 2 1/2 hours of arguments. He did say one should come "relatively soon." A court injunction allowed the Williamses to finish out last season, but the suspension risk remains.

Source: Minneapolis Star-Tribune

We should hear the results within a couple weeks. It could just determine how are season will be.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can we pick what 4 games we don't have "the wall" in!! Lol!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To tell you the truth, if they DO get the suspension, I hope it is the first 4 of the season. Cleveland, Detroit, San Francisco, and Green Bay. After that they see the likes of Baltimore and Pittsburgh.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My memory is not serving me right now and I havent looked it up, but wouldnt Pats games he missed last year count against the pending suspension?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it would have, if he would have pleaded guilty before he was out for them games.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think so fishin, he was injured! But it would be great!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know how you can be milionares and mess up like this. Although, I think the blame is partly on the league here when the players called and they were told it was safe to take.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it's [PoorWordUsage]. They knew full well what they were doing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think so...I think they were misinformed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think they should have to serve the suspension, misinformed or not. They should make these guys an example so this kind of stuff doesn't keep happening. Just goes to show they can get away with anything these days. mad

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it's [PoorWordUsage]. They knew full well what they were doing.

No doubt.

Lets hope they can get the penalty knocked down to Two games some how.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We're not talking steroids here...it was a supplement to help them shed a few pounds. I do think they will eventually end up being suspended but from the reports that are out it sounds like they tried to cover all their bases and STILL got stung. They weren't trying to get away with anything...just took the wrong supplement on some bad advice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Correct zepman and from what I've always heard they called the league office to verify it wasn't on the banned substance list. They were told it was fine to take. That puts the blame back on the NFL IMO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i would say that if it wasnt on the list, then they shouldnt be out any games at all. dont change something when it wasnt on the list

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From the reports that came out when all of this first broke it sounds like the Williams boys and the Saints players who were nailed for the same drug all did their homework on the drug and in all cases it looked legit.

I think I even remember Deuce Mcallister sent some of the drug for testing to see what it had in it before he took any of it.

I believe that the company that made the drug is actually being sued by one of the Saints players that already served his suspension beucase the ingredient that was banned by the NFL is not listed on the label and it did not show up in the tests the Deuce had done. Sounds like the drug company maybe produced a batch of the drug that was either contaminated with a banned substance or they changed the formula and didn't list that on the label.

It just sounds like all the players did what they could to ensure it was a legal drug to be taking.

If you are told somthing is ok by several different sources including the governing body for your sport (the NFL in this case) why would you doubt it?

I understand that the players are responsible for what they put in their bodies but there is a point where the NFL needs to take responsibility with providing them with the correct information.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nicely put, that's exactly my feelings on it. They jumped through all the hoops they needed to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One small problem its up to the players not the league. It's in writing in the collective bargaining agreement that ALL players signed.

Also its not the leagues job to follow all these fly by nite company's that are intentionally putting banned substances in their products and its ludicrous to suggest so.

Probably a 4 game suspension and rightfully so but with all the whining and lawyering maybe we can get lucky and get these fools penalty reduced to 2 games or less.

Go T-Jack/Favre!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so they're fools because they're not chemists??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure what more they could have done.

If I'm told by 3 sources something is legal I'm going to take their word for it.

If the NFL wants no responsibility then they should not be offering an answer as to whether or not a product is banned. As soon as the NFL tells me something is legal then that would be all that i would need to hear.

I do understand the way the rule is written and I think it probably should be reworded to give the players steps that they can take to ensure a product is safe or not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

well the news isn't good

The NFL earned a significant victory in the Minnesota federal court on Friday, a win that could hurt the Minnesota Vikings and New Orleans Saints in the upcoming season.

A federal judge dismissed the claims of five NFL players who had been suspended last season for use of a banned diuretic in the diet supplement StarCaps. Among the five are four starting defensive linemen for the Vikings and Saints, including Pro Bowl defensive tackles Pat Williams and Kevin Williams(notes) of Minnesota and starting defensive ends Charles Grant(notes) and Will Smith(notes) of New Orleans.

All four are expected to sit the first four games of next season without pay. Their suspensions had been blocked last season while U.S. district judge Paul Magnuson heard arguments from the league and the NFL Players Association.

“We are pleased that after a careful review of the record the court has upheld the suspensions of the players in this case,” NFL spokesman Greg Aiello wrote in an email Saturday morning. The decision strongly supports the NFL program on performance enhancing substances that protects the health and safety of NFL players and the integrity of our game.”

The league had suspended the four defensive linemen and then-Saints running back Deuce McAllister(notes) last season after they tested positive for the diuretic Bumetanide, which flushes water from the body and is considered a masking agent for steroids. McAllister is currently unsigned, but also faces a four-game suspension.

Attorney David Cornwell argued on the players’ behalf that the league failed to warn the players about the presence of Bumetanide in StarCaps even though the league had known for two years that StarCaps contained the banned substance.

The issue created a significant debate about the role of the league’s policy on performance-enhancing substances.

A message to NFLPA attorney Jeff Kessler, who argued the case in federal court, was not immediately returned.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sooner or later these sports stars will have to learn they cannot play with these drugs as they will get caught. So many of these players believe they are above the law or rules and play dumb when caught that they didn't know.

Seems its in every sport now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with you Tom, but in this case I don't believe they were totally in the wrong. They did all the checking that is required of them and were told, by the NFL drug office, that it was safe to take. Not sure how that comes back to being their fault. They even had it tested on their own.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The NFL is appealing a federal judge decision to remand the cases of Pat Williams and Kevin Williams to state court.

The NFL wants the Williams Wall to abide by the federal law whereas the players prefer their case to be heard in the more employee friendly Minnesota state court.

Source: Associated Press

Related: Kevin Williams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the banned substance rules need to be altered a little in light of this case.

I understand that each player is responsible for whats in their own bodies and thats fine. I just think the nfl should publish a list of the substances that are banned and NOT a list of the products that contain them.

It sounds like the banned substance the Williams boys tested positive for was on the banned substance list but it was not on the list of products the NFL supplies and it was not listed on the label by the drug company that made it.

That situation leaves room for mistakes to happen. I really don't know how the williams boys are supposed to know anymore then what they are told.

I don't see this as them thinking they are above the law or that they were trying to get away with it. I see this as them having done their homework but having the correct answers changed when they took test.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • I'll be getting out again on Tuesday with the bow. It has been very hard finding time to get out this year, between work and a 4 month old at home. Last time out I spent 12 hours in the blind and saw quite a few birds during the middle of the day. Had multiple times where I thought it was going to happen but the Toms wouldn't commit 100%. Making a small adjustment this go round and hoping things come together.
    • Was thinking for hunting and maybe put a plow on it to use at my place up north. Wouldn't be my main driver. Was thinking around 15K for budget but that was before I did much looking mostly on line so far. But might step up in price for the right rig. And a lot of that would depend if I liked the newer V6 engine and 5 speed auto or 6 speed trany and less miles etc. Just by looking at dealer prices on line I would think a guy could find a pretty nice late model for around 20 or less. I think if I bought a nicer later model I would drive it more as they look like they have made the interior a lot nicer and more comfortable than the older ones. On the other hand if I ran across a real clean older one with the in line 6 and not to many miles for the right price that would be an option to. The drawback to a newer shiny one it might take a while before I ran it down the brushy trail.  
    • I am submitting this bird for Sutty on his behalf.     Forum Member: Sutty          
      Date: April 28, 2017
      Team Name: Team 2
      Youth Hunter(17 or younger): No
      Turkey Subspecies: Eastern
      State/Province Bird was Harvested In: Minnesota
       
       
      Turkey’s Stats
      Beard Length 10 inches
      Spur Length 1 & 3/16" 
      Weight 22lb 4oz
      I certify that the measurements listed above are accurate to the best of my ability.
      Forum Member: John Sutton                       Date: 4/28
      Witness: Josh Tschida                     Date: 4/28          
    • Our MN hunt this year was just about as easy as they come.  Sutty and I arrived at different times, he was late, and set up on opposite sides of the field as planned.  I could hear the birds gobbling in the valley below in their usual spot, and they sat there a long time in the cold.  Sutty couldn't see because he was on the back side of a finger of trees because he didn't want to spook anything out since he was late...  Eventually they got down and proceeded to sit on the far hill for a while longer.  I could see a 6 or so males, but suspected most were jakes, and a few hens.     Just when I was getting tired of waiting, about 8:30am, I saw one gobbler enter the field and walk straight towards Sutty's position.  As the bird got in front of Sutty, another nice gobbler came into the field.  I called to him but he wanted nothing to do with me.  Sutty shot the first bird, and the second one didn't know what happened.  Of course Sutty came running out of his blind and scared off the second bird that he didn't even know was there.      Sutty just bought a new house and had to head home asap to help his wife with packing things, and his daughter didn't seem too interested in shooting her own bird this year.  Now that she saw how ridiculously easy it is she probably won't be interested next time either.      I figured I should get to the edge of the field the birds were coming out on, and as I started moving my blind I bumped some hens that hadn't yet come up all the way out of the valley.   I finished getting my blind in place and sat a while, but it seemed we had scared the remaining birds out of the area, or maybe they were just laying low out of the wind.  In any case I went to get some lunch and let things settle down for a while.     After a couple hours of eating and casting for fish that weren't there, I decided I would head back up to sit in my blind.  Just as I reached the top of the hill to see into the field I saw three big gobblers walking across the field.  I ducked down and ran around the edge of the field out of their view to get closer.     I crawled up to about 10yd from the field edge, as far as I could go without being seen, and started calling.  They liked what they heard, but wouldn't commit right away.  After maybe 10 minutes of me cutting and purring, and all three of them strutting and gobbling out at 60-70 yards they started coming.  I couldn't see them well through the brush I was behind, and they didn't want to walk through it.  If I was at the edge of the field I could have shot them, they were within 40yd.  They proceeded to do a big arc along the field edge back to where I had just walked.     After a couple minutes of not seeing them I picked up my call, they gobbled, and then I saw them marching in where I had just walked.  When I last saw them going this direction I had shifted to face that way, I was now facing the tree I just had my back against, which put my butt in a thorn patch and the barrel to one side of the tree.  The birds started walking to the other side, so as they got behind the tree I eased the barrel to the side they were going to come out on.  They started coming up the other side back to the field they were just in and were too close together for a shot.  Finally one eased out in front and I let him have it.  He tipped backwards and rolled back downhill, and didn't even kick until I went over to grab him.  27 yards with the range finder after the fact.       Both birds turned out to be very nice old birds with long spurs.     Sutty's weighted 22lb 4oz, 10" beard, 1 3/16" spurs.  I believe this is his best turkey to date.     My bird weighted 25lb 8oz, 10" beard, 1 1/8" spurs.  My best turkey by weight and age.     Sutty and his bird.        Me and my bird.  I shot from one of the trees above this rock I think.      
    • Got it done in mn.  More to come when I get home.
    • Go to a license agent and buy one for your desired season. Season C, is on process thru May 2nd. Season D, is May 3rd thru May 9th. Season E, is May 10th thru May 16th. Season F, is May 17th thru May 31st. Season F also allows anyone with an unused tag from earlier season to hunt this period as well.   Hope this help PF.  
    • How do the over the counter licenses work this year? I missed last season but would like to get out this year even though I didn't apply for the lottery.
    • What exactly will you be using it for? Driving around the country with the top down, hunting the back woods, fording small creeks?   Do you have a particular budget to stick to?
    • at times the prop will stop on mine, usually when I move it to turn, need to tear into it sometime, I have use fishelectronics for misc. parts
    • I might have to get out and test drive a few and figure out what I like and don't like. Definitly not buying new so Ill narrow it down a bit and then wait for that cherry to show up.
  • Our Sponsors