Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
stifler51

TV shows.....

Recommended Posts

Walleyes take more skill? or they are not is easy to pinpoint a cast and catch a fish. No dock walleyes, walleyes feeding on buzzbaits, or flip to a fallin tree. IMO, many think the only way to catch a walleye is to troll.

But there are a few shows that do fish for walleyes. FLW tour, Linder's angling edge, Infisherman. Just no show that fishes only walleyes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Next Bite also does a number of walleye shows, with the others for muskie and pike. Bass show after bass show does get old, especially when most are on southern reservoirs that are in no way similar to MN lakes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Because most of the US other than the midwest has an infatuation with bass so they are satisfying the masses.

I agree with Jim, since walleyes take a little work to catch it takes alot more shooting time to produce a show about them.

Steve

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mark Romanacks Fishing 411 does a fair amount of fishing for walleyes ,,,I have gotten an education from that show many times

LAS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Midwest Outdoors and Lindner's Angling Edge seem to always have walleye segments.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i guess it just seems like every time i flip to those channels its always something dumb like fly fishing some flats off some coast that i have zero interest in watching. Or like nick said its always some bass show that is filmed in waters that are not even close to midwest waters. I know there is some good dvds out there, but just wish there was something more on the lines of being able to set my DVR to rec something knowing everytime it will be about walleyes rather then a chance a show might have a 10 min segment

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Economics. The VS, Outdoor Channel, Sportsmans, etc are all nationwide networks, and the walleye world is fairly niche in the grand scheme of things. There's much more money in deer hunting, bass fishing and shooting, thus the vast majority of these types of shows. There's only a handful of walleye-type shows on these channels. Babe Winkelman and Next Bite, which are both on VS. Winkelman is on quite often, Next Bite has very poor air times and you'll have to DVR it.

Most walleye shows are on the regional networks such as FSN North and 45, although 45's Saturday morning block diminished this past year. On FSN North, you'll find the majority of the walleye shows because it's their target market. Most air in the first quarter (Jan - March) and a few trickle into the 2nd Q.

On FSN, you'll find Lindner's Angling Edge, In-Fish, Furtman's Sportman's Journal, Fishing the Midwest, Gillepies Waters & Woods, Midwest Outdoors, etc and a few muskie shows. It's an extremely tough market for these shows to survive in and I hope they all see next season.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Shorelunch summed it up pretty good, it's more of a niche. Check out The Sportsmans Channel and search by programming and set up your DVR to all the In-Fish shows that you want, its all layout by each week day and hour. Most shows just can't do just walleyes when you have a bass lure sponsor etc.

mr

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i dont mind as much the bass shows, its all those shows fishing saltwater fish non-stop and some of the other fishing just have no interest because i will never do it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
RK    29

...all those shows fishing saltwater fish non-stop and some of the other fishing just have no interest because i will never do it

Funny you say that - that's exactly why they're about the only fishing shows I can stand watching. I do some saltwater fishing now and then, but I'm fascinated by some of the stuff on TV. The less likely I am to do it, the more interesting I think it is. (although, as fun as they are to catch, the redfish stuff is starting to wear a little thin...are you listening Shaw Grigsby and Roland Martin?)

Having been on and been otherwise involved with several shows over the years, I think what makes walleye shows a tough sell is their regional niche, and the plain fact that a lot of walleye fishing doesn't exactly make for must-watch TV. Hard to make slip-bobbering, planer boarding or live bait rigging exciting. Walleyes don't jump, aren't spectacular fighters (watching a guy skip in a walleye caught on a crankbait without ever slowing the boat down - boy, there's some exciting TV...), the techniques aren't visually interesting unless you're really wanting to learn the details... plus the fish aren't huge most of the time. Hard for that to compete with topwater strikes or jumping tarpon.

Personally, I think good walleye shows are very hard to do well, and very easy to do badly. Lindners excel because, well, they're the Lindners, plus their camera work is mind-blowing. Tony Dean made it work mainly (I think) because of his personality - he was so endearing as a person you skipped right over the simple visuals and bare-bones education aspect, and just enjoyed Tony. TNB (whom I've been associated with through TNB/EA magazine) does some great visuals with CGI that kind of sets them apart. A lot of the others are, to me, unwatchable. Midwest outdoors being a prime example. I'd rather be waterboarded.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Haha Tony Dean shows werent very eye catching thats for sure, not to much out there on the river systems, cattle, old trees and hills, but he was such a great guy is what made me watch plus he was a heck of a fisherman

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have found a good HSOforum you guys might want to check out if you want to send me a PM. The shows are free to watch on the internet and there are several to choose from. Every episode of Babe Winkleman is on there and a series out of Canada, Linder's shows etc.

I have enjoyed countless hours of watching this spring as I wait to leave for Canada.

Just a thought.

TonyO

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a question on TV shows from a while ago. What show or who was it that got talked into trying to land a sturgeon in a float tube and was being pulled around the lake like a bobber? It was the funniest fishing show I ever saw and for the life of me can't remember who it was. Best gag ever pulled on a host of a TV show. He actually thought the guy was serious and did it. Or does anyone have a link to this episode?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know exactly what Stifler51 is talking about. There are a lot of shows that have good walleye fishing and many have been named here (I think we missed Butch Furtman's Sportsman's Journal). But I have noticed too that it seems like they haven't been on much lately. Maybe it's just bad timing on my part, but the last few weeks it seems like I can never find any shows that I want to watch. WFN may have changed their programming recently?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have found a good HSOforum you guys might want to check out if you want to send me a PM. The shows are free to watch on the internet and there are several to choose from. Every episode of Babe Winkleman is on there and a series out of Canada, Linder's shows etc.

I have enjoyed countless hours of watching this spring as I wait to leave for Canada.

Just a thought.

TonyO

Hey TonyO, can you forward me that HSOforum you were talking about??? For some reason I can't send out a PM.

Thanks! bucky@mncable.net

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • sorta helps, I'll find it...  thanks... me and google just got it.....     have to go see!!
    • Hall of Fame? You must be joking...... Every player starts out like that. No one starts out with a 23 m dollar contract. He still averaged about 15 million per year for his career, that average probably goes up if he plays past 2018. I think he will be ok.
    • Joe was also the 74th highest paid player the year he won the MVP. You may say he is over paid now but he was underpaid 1st half of his career. @Bobby Bass   I don't think Joe is a future Hall of Famer, not even close to borderline but a great player none the less. I think if the Twins would have made a deeper playoff runs back when Morneau was healthy and Santana was Cy-young would have helped. But Joes playoff numbers are terrible. I could maybe see HOF if he would have stayed at catcher his entire career though..... But he will more than likely end up winning a gold glove at 2 positions, and with one being catcher that is pretty elite.
    • Big Dave most if not all pro contracts are paying you for what you have already done with the hope that you will continue to produce. Looking at todays contract Joe's is not to out of line for a future Hall of Famer
    • Great! He is finally earning a contract close to what he is being paid. 
    • thx.  directions are on the site below. just across river from college    http://www.munsingerclemens.com/the-gardens/munsinger-gardens 2 areas, up top and down by river
    • Free agency is far from a sure thing, if there are young centers out there (big if) you have to compete with maybe 10 or 20 other teams and pay way over what you should. You have control of nothing and are at the whims of a player everyone is chasing. Same with trades, very easy to swing and miss. By most account we were in on Ryan Johansen with the Preds but Columbus wanted Jones over Brodin and I don't blame them. 
    • Good stuff but time wiill tell. Not buying the "oh we might lose him as a UFA"...so what, with that kind of money we could buy just as good and younger to give us more of a future...which we desparately need to be thinking about.  Fletch is walking a tightrope and it is going to break IMO.
    • Come on BB, you are better than that. You as much as anyone know that ONE player doesn't make an NHL Team a Stanley Cup contender so why put that blame on him. Sure, a player like Crosby certainly helps, but we aren't talking about the money that Crosby is getting here either. Comparing Koivu's contracts to equivalent players with similar production is quite compelling. He has performed better than many of his peers for his current contract and with the lower AV of his new deal if he continues similar numbers it will be a bargain. I wasn't too happy about the NMC either, but I take that as a bargaining chip so CF didn't have to go with a longer term deal. 2 years is sufficient and I think it works well for both parties. You are right, there are many people out there with more knowledge about the market and what he could have gotten elsewhere and when it may have made sense to sign him, but the fact is you don't want to wait to sign him until after the season for if no other reason at all than to allow him to be a UFA and hear other offers. This will be my last post about the Koivu extension because clearly we don't see eye to eye on whether it made/makes sense, but I assure you there are a large number of "hockey minds" that are in agreement with me on this. Here is some afternoon reading for you: https://www.hockeywilderness.com/2017/9/20/16332552/mikko-koivu-contract-extension-minnesota-wild-criticism-overpaid-chuck-fletcher-cap-space
    • Red admiral i believe.
  • Our Sponsors