Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Apex

HOW MUCH WEIGHT DO WALLEYES LOOSE

8 posts in this topic

WELL WE ALL GOT TO TALKING ON OPENER AFTER A PHENOMENAL DAY OF FISHING AND THE TOPIC CAME UP WHEN WE WERE HAVING A COUPLE OF COCKTAILS. HOW MUCH WEIGHT DO YOU THINK WALLEYES LOOSE AFTER SPAWN? WE ALL CAME TO AN AGREEMENT THAT ITS NOT POUNDS MORE LIKE MAYBE A 1/2 POUND. DOES ANYONE OUT THERE HAVE A ANSWER TO THIS QUESTION?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well just to chime in here... Ive been involved with a fair amount of egg stripping with the DNR. I would say first of all its all relative to the size of the fish...... a half a pound? Well sure thats true on a 17-19 inch walleye maybe. Weve netted several walleye out of shallow nutrient rich lakes in the 28-29" range that will go in the ballpark of 12 pounds. I would bet those same fish in the middle of july or so would just break 8 pounds. Keep in mind, this is not all "egg weight". The pre-spawn fish are similar to a pre-rut buck. Well fed, fattened, they are in top physical condition for the events to come.

To me, its opened my eyes as to "what is a truely big walleye"? I believe a 30" is a remarkable walleye! A 10 pounder is so often the bench mark to a mounter, but so often in winter a fairly young, short fish can pack on enough weight to make 10 pounds fairly easily. In spring sampling, the number of 30" walleyes compared to 28" is mindblowing. But an egg-filled 10 pounder is quite common. I guess they are all trophys to someone:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I got a 31" eye Sunday on the St. Louis River that was only 8.52# and that same fish in July on Lake Superior would be about 10.5# or so.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My cousin's 31" on Saturday weighed 10.76 pounds and appeared to be egg free I would guess.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Where was it caught? Mine was on a river and river fish are usually thinner and Lake Superior walleyes grow Sloooow.

But as with any fish you have some that break the rules on both sides of the tape.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Right on let's call it about a 1,000 acre lake in Ottertail county, big difference yes. Right on NL, some are thinner and some are thicker, I like that little gem of a lake we did so well on over the years because it has a great tullibee pop. and a modest to low pike pop., the lake just seems to grow large fish walleye,pike,bass. The river fish I tend to catch seldomly now but they always seemed thinner overall. A 31" is a beauty no matter what the scale says and congrats on breaking that tough to break 30" mark. smile

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Man congrats on the big fish guys! The biggest walleye I ever caught was a 25 incher, that was a few years ago, didn't weigh it but measured it and let it go.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I caught a post spawn female up by Flin Flon/Snow Lake. It measured 33 1/2" and just over 14lbs. My guess is that fish would have easily been in the 17 or 18lbs 2-3 weeks earlier.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Looks like the rust belt should of went with a better rustproofing package.........     Donald Trump may have positioned himself as the champion of American workers but Republicans on the Hill are already embracing his “do as I say, not as I do” modus operandi. Under the backing of Paul Ryan, the GOP leadership stripped a provision from a water bill Monday that would have required American-made iron and steel products to be used in infrastructure projects in Flint and elsewhere funded by the Safe Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF). Democratic Ohio Sen. Sherrod Brown blasted Republicans, who removed the “Buy America” provision (which passed the Senate with strong bipartisan support) while the House and Senate were reconciling the bills. In other words, GOP leadership scrapped it behind closed doors. “By stripping meaningful Buy America rules from the water infrastructure bill, Washington leadership is choosing China and Russia over Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin,” said Brown. “This was the first major test of whether Washington establishment Republicans would live up to President-elect Trump’s promises to put American products and American workers first – they failed, and American iron and steel workers will pay the price.” Now, Brown is teaming up with Democratic Sens. Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin and Bob Casey of Pennsylvania to insert the provision back in the bill. They want to reattach the provision to a nearly $12 billion Water Resource Development Act (WRDA), which authorizes dozens of infrastructure projects around the country and is on track to pass the House this week. “I’m not giving up on this fight,” Baldwin said in a telephone interview Tuesday. “Why would we pass a bill that only benefits Russian and Chinese steel corporations when we could be providing certainty to American manufacturers of steel and iron?” That sentiment was shared by some steel worker groups earlier this week: “From our end it’s a little baffling,” said Roy Houseman, a legislative representative for the United Steelworkers. “It’s been a program that’s been really successful, and it has bipartisan support. We’re just very confused by the Speaker, who’s not listening to the rest of his caucus.” In essence, “Buy America” sounds as nice to Republicans as it did to Trump, but in practice they would rather preserve the "Buy Chinese" option that Trump uses to build his skyscrapers.
    • If there are any twins fans left, I wonder if these new young bucks running the club have asked mauer if he would lift his no trade clause?  I think we know the answer.  I find it interesting to watch these winter meetings trades etc but we are never involved.  It seems like we are missing something as fans.
    • Sorry BD2 --I think the trout is the most dependent on everything Now the king of conservatism is a-----------------------carp   This could get interesting!
    • Sorry but the Walleye is the most Liberal fish in Minnesota. In most lakes it depends solely on the government and taxpayers of the state for it's very survival and proliferation. Lot's of other fish breeds are able to take care of themselves without help from the Government, those are the conservative fish. 
    • They make a variety of suits to suit your fishing style really. If you are a run and gun style fisherman, or if you're a guy that sits in the fish house all day they, and most brands nowadays have one that will suit your needs. I'm more hot blooded so when they first came out I ordered the Lite suit, a little less insulation but just as durable. It has been discontinued but it I think it was replaced with the Predator suit. 
    • Nah....walleyes would be hard-line Republicans;  conservative with little or no imagination, terrified of doing something new or different or pushing ahead with anything not tried before. Show me a 6-pound walleye and I'll show you Barry Goldwater with scales  or Ronald Reagan when he was not napping. PF is right, catching a walleye,  even a nice big fat one, is about as exciting as a naked tussle with Rosie O'Donnell or dragging a bag of seaweed into your boat. We used to catch some really big ones in MT and after a bit we learned that the big perch fought better and were way more tasty!  No kidding, those perch....12-15" were way better eating.  But then we were catching them from cold clear water. But if you are really new to fishing and don't possess a lot of skill by all means become a walleye fisherman-anybody can do it.
    • Well it's "Throw Down" time! For years I have kept a bag of sunflower seeds in the cup holder of my SUV to nibble on as I ride along. In the last few weeks since about the last weekend up north Deer hunting I would come in and think, man I really down some seeds, that was a pretty new bag? Then checking my oil one day noticed some empties under the hood!  Um, someone's having a party? Went to pick up my Deer at the butcher today and again found the new bag almost empty! Checked back seat floor and found a few sprinkles on the floor! That's it, don't mind the little guy along for a ride but don't touch my seeds! Thought about setting up the trail cam to plan some strategy, but just went with the blind two trap set front and back seat floor. Report when I get some results!
    • Read it again grasshopper, I never said any such thing.     Pence LOST jobs, Johnson gained jobs and the money didn't come out of revenue that was already being produced. Johnson's money came out of NEW tax revenue that would have never been earned if they didn't do the deal.   I don't know what that quote is you posted but I never said any of that.
    • Catching a walleye is about as exciting as reeling in a bath towel. Not sure how that justifies being an elitist. Bullheads put up a better fight.    I always considered walleyes to be the liberals of the fish world. 
    • When was the last time? 1835? That was the last time the national debt was paid off.     How would you know that? We've never taken a trillion dollars off the debt EVER.      
  • Our Sponsors