Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Flatline

Trying macro/close up

8 posts in this topic

Trying macro/close ups on some dandelions in backyard.

Images are with Sony a300, kit 18-70 lens, 2 sec self timer, on tripod. Only cropped and resized. C&C welcome.

70mm, f13, 160s, iso100, 4x macro lens adapter

DSC03051-1.jpg

70mm, f13, 1/160s, iso100 4x macro lens adapter

DSC03052-1.jpg

60mm, f13, 1/125s, iso100, 4x and 2x macro lens adaptors stacked

DSC03060-1.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice balance of colors, Darrin.

I'm not conversant in your 2x and 4x macro converters. Are they like hollow extension tubes that put your lens farther from the sensor so you can focus closer, or are they actual teleconverters with magnifying glass in them?

While I really like the way you've arranged the compositions, I think a bit of sharpening in post-processing would make them pop better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am probably using the wrong terminology.They are a like a screw on filter. Wind was blowing ever so slightly

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, they screw onto the front of your lens? Got it. I edited my first post because I'd belatedly realized you didn't do any sharpening in post-processing. smilesmile

Also, the sharpening in my opinion is a minor issue in this case. They are sharp enough to be attractive and that is, well, sharp enough. smilesmile

Also there's more fun to come experimenting with light, which has a big impact on a macro/closeup subject. There are plenty of diffusers/reflectors around that can mellow out harsh light or bounce light into shadowed areas. Some like to use those and some prefer nature's light unbent by human hands.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You could always try out the Raynox DCR-150 or 250 snap on diopters. Really cheap for what they do. Some examples here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I really like the 1st and 3rd. Nice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ooohhh I love the colours!! nice!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the tips and feedback. I am looking forward to trying other options for light and composition.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    •   Well, like I said, I think it was fake news but it was still pretty darn good! I like a really tomatoey chili and this one was that.
    •   I like chili without beans but my wife likes them and this recipe called for beans so I went with it.   That's pretty close to what I just made but it looks darn good. I'll probably try this one next time!
    •   This has zero to do with the article I posted. I don't think you get it.   Another one that doesn't get it.
    •     So you're saying that statement isn't true?      
    •   Oh, I see now.   The Feds bowing out completely,  zero control, regulation and placing it in the hands of the citizens, effectively ending the war, will flip the script and it will correct itself.    Crime down, prisons emptied, addiction to new lows, family saved.   Stfu.   You have no idea or plans to swap in after decriminalizing. None. Nothing.        
    •     Do you have any evidence to back this statement up?   Because if you listen to Trump's rhetoric, the focus is clearly on illegal drugs coming across the border.  With a traditional militaristic approach.
    •     The double standard pertains more to whether you have the financial resources to go into treatment and avoid going to prison than to legal versus illegal.  If Rush didn't have the financial resources to hire a good lawyer, he would have gone to prison rather than to a treatment center - simple as that.  The federal government (via the taxpayers) funds prisons - they do not fund treatment centers.   Both are controlled substances, but the reality is the government doesn't do a very good job of controlling either one.  They are still dragging their feet on legalizing or even re-classifying marijuana, even though it is common knowledge their classification is a complete farce.   The legal opiate version is just as addicting, or possibly more addicting than the illegal version, and accounts for the largest percentage of drug overdose deaths today.   If there is a crackdown on prescription opioids, the data shows there will be an increase in illegal heroin use.  Florida is a prime example.   We know there are ways of treating addiction that do not involve prison sentences.     The War on Drugs going at it from the traditional/conventional federal perspective is a complete failure.   Those are the facts, but obviously none of that makes any difference to you, and you will continue to defend the status quo with no rational reason to do so.     Bobby nailed it when he said "syntax error on line 1"....              
    • And KIDNEY BEANS? HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAA!
  • Our Sponsors