Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
BullFighter

GUT PILE

18 posts in this topic

If you shoot a deer, leave the gut pile where you shot the deer, will the gut pile

discourage other deer from coming that way?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have never noticed that problem. On a friday my cusin shot a doe out of my stand, and left the gut pile. The next morning I shot a nice 8 pointer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, I read in a mag where they did an experiment on that. Actually one of the first animals to come check it out was a doe. They used a trail cam to see results, and the deer was like licking it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have shot numerous deer checking out gut piles. We have one great spot on our farm where most of our deer get shot. Two years ago there were 7 gut piles within 150 yards of the stand.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the human smell from standing around and field dressing the animals would affect them more that the "pile" smell. We try to minimize the amount of time that we spend on the ground near our big buck stands. We have stands that produce does or small buck almost every day even with human scent around but the BIG boys won't tolerate it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My only thing is a few years back I gutted a buck and my dad was hoping to use the same stand and on the walk to it I can only guess but sounded like a coyote or 2 on that gutpile, we saw no deer that morning, but yes it doesn't seem to bother them but I've had minimal luck for some reason after there is a fresh one, maybe it's leaving a mature bucks privates parts behind and leaving too much human scent in the area, might depend some on what kind of cover or what kind of hunting area you hunt a bit but I wouldn't worry about it and boy am I choking down this breakfast with a grimace now lol.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the human smell from standing around and field dressing the animals would affect them more that the "pile" smell. We try to minimize the amount of time that we spend on the ground near our big buck stands. We have stands that produce does or small buck almost every day even with human scent around but the BIG boys won't tolerate it.

Interesting that you should point this out. Kind of reinforces my opinion that human smell alone doesn't bother deer too much. Considering the amount of odor left behind by the process of gutting out a deer, if human smell created such a negative reaction to deer, they wouldn't come anywhere near a pile of entrails left behind from a kill. Truth is, as I have stated before, the odor only gets them aware of our presence either past or present but odor alone does not bother them. Chances are if they heard someone approaching or saw movement along with the odor, they'll definitely get their hair on edge and make a choice whether to flee or stay.

Edit: I should mention that we have taken many deer where we actually have had to move the carcass so we could gut it out without standing in the last deer's entrails. These kills have been as far apart as 30 minutes or less. If smell was truly so negative, I find it hard to believe we would have these opportunities.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree on the mature buck piece, but think it is still the human odor that spooks them. I guarantee in my area after the opening day is done they walk by our stands, sniffing carefully much of the way trying to figure out where no one has been, some don't have any choice because the entire section is full of deer stands and they have to live among them, going nocturnal so of course they'll have to go by gutpiles and stay on the land they feel safest on and know there way around the best. Human odor in my area has a major affect on the deer and their travel because once opening day is done, everyone is making drives because no one is seeing much from their stands. Hit the right weather and you can get some before dark deer movement. Hope the rut can move em but often the doe is smart enough to wait until dark to let the buck chase her. Years ago with less pressure in my area we would see big numbers of deer in shooting light, when the woods and swamps got more stands, divided up, and pressured more we see a 1/10 of what we used to and we had only 2 days to hunt instead of nine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It really depends on the area, size of quality terrain, and the amount of pressure placed on them. Where I hunt there are stands on every 10 acres and every field has a stand or 2 on it's edges. Also, where the deer like to bed there are now stands in many of those places, they are really seeking out that little bit of undisturbed cover they can find and moving at last light if at all on many of those 9 days. I guess I've never worried much or thought much about a gutpile because I hunt alone and once I've made a gutpile I'm done anyway. I guess since 1983 our group of 20 have taken very few if any mature bucks when we've had gutpiles on the ground that I'm aware of anyway. But, I would guess hunting mature bucks just gets tougher as the season goes along so who knows.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I should've reread the ?, no I don't think a gutpile will discourage them from coming your way, some might go for a look and sniff to see what is out of the ordinary on there travels. I think there are so many variables that deer movement relies upon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've never noticed them to stay away, and i've had 3 or 4 at times near my stand.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I shot an eight pointer at 9:00am opening morning. After gutting it I had deer walk the same trail right past the gut pile. Another eight pointer three hours after I shot passed by. It seemed a little bit skidish when in the area but sure didn't stop it. Even the next day deer were walking past it. The following weekend the pile was gone. Deer were still on the move.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i have heard some say they will sniff the pile to see what it is, makes them curious

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder if the scent of coyotes cleaning up a gut pile scare them off some, but I have had deer walk right next to gut piles and remnants of gut piles with out giving them a second look.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In my experience the gut piles don't seem to spook deer, but I have noticed deer spook badly when they reach the spot where the dead deer was standing when shot. My thought is that there must be some sort of "panic" gland that is triggered by loud noises and an ounce of copperplated lead hitting the boiler room.

I have also seen deer duck and run when they reach the trail where another deer was dragged.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In my experience the gut piles don't seem to spook deer, but I have noticed deer spook badly when they reach the spot where the dead deer was standing when shot. My thought is that there must be some sort of "panic" gland that is triggered by loud noises and an ounce of copperplated lead hitting the boiler room.

I have also seen deer duck and run when they reach the trail where another deer was dragged.

Good info JackPineRob, I have had some similar experiences. Back in my early bow hunting days I would often get busted before I could get a shot off. I either drew at the wrong time, moved at the wrong time, had bad camo or one of a hundred other noob mistakes. If the deer didn't bolt right away they would stomp their hoofs and do the old head-bob and cautiously move along without giving me a shot opportunity. On a few occasions another deer or two would come along from another direction, they were totally calm and oblivious to my presence. Then BAM they cross the path where a deer ran off or they froze in the exact same location as another deer had stomped at me. I want to say I've read about some kind of gland in their feet but I will have to do a little more research before I can confirm that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No doubt I walk through shin deep water trying to be scent free as possible, doesn't matter, shot at a nice 8pointer, missed, walked back to the stand, 1/2 hour later lone doe, hit my tracks where I looked for blood where the buck stood and she was all on red alert, sniffing the ground, pegged me without any problems and would not cross my boot path on this popple island highground, she turned and went back the way she came, very frightened. Dad said you missed, dad showed me my scope was done, loose recticle or something, no wonder I fired a full box and couldn't get that thing zoomed in, bought a scope that night and used the old 303 british the rest of that season, young and dumb back then.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • And if the leftists get lucky at the convention?     You aren't against human rights, like income, health care, equality, LBGTQ rights, and stuff like that, right?  
    • You scale them, no?
    •   So, why bother with locks?  Honest people won't take your stuff even if the door is unlocked.   I am in the camp that I want to make it at least a little difficult for the crooks.   Especially since three people in our family have had their houses burgled and stuff taken.
    • The result right now is not good. One way or the other the toilet needs flushing
    • Mostly I talk about this with respect to the nonsense about multiple parties or no parties some on here seem so fond of.      It is all a fantasy.   Some new party could possibly take over an existing party, like Trumpism did, or even replace it like happened back in the day but in the end there will be two parties.     Perhaps a parlimentary system with multiple parties would be better than what we have, but, in my opinion, you can't get there from here.  It's like the calls for a Constitutional Convention.   Do you guys seriously think that could happen, and that the result would be good?  
    • I haven't gone up the old Grade, but do head to Outing via Emily and NE from there, and it is really nice. Hardly any roads to go across and little to no ditch riding. I have got to try the Old Grade, as I would think it is like that. We grouse and duck hunt up there now and then, but haven't lately. Great place with lots of public land and opportunity.
    •   But yet I countered with an actual study but you think your own speculative based opinion is better. OK then.     How very hypocritical.      I would end the discussion after that last statement too.
    •     I can guess it is not for humanitarian reasons.   Mexico has about had their fill of fighting the drug war for us, and are moving towards decriminalization.  If California legalizes weed, this would be enough to tip the scales in favor of decriminalization for Mexico.       For years now, Mexico has paid an extraordinarily high price in lives and social disruption for Washington’s insistence that North America’s drug problem be tackled south of the border, where the drugs are grown and transported, rather than primarily in clinics and halfway houses at home to treat the medical and psychological issues of users. Mexican President Pena Nieto.   Successive administrations, starting with President Nixon, have demanded ever-tougher border controls, aerial-spraying programs, and DEA-backed anti-“cartel” operations in Mexico. All those efforts and sacrifices have been for naught. U.S. residents currently export up to $29 billion in cash to Mexican traffickers each year to buy marijuana, cocaine, methamphetamines and heroin.   Forcing that trade underground has taken a terrible toll on Mexico in terms of violence, corruption and social upheaval. Since 2006, when President Felipe Calderón ordered his military to join the “war” on drug traffickers, Mexico has lost about 200,000 lives and 30,000 more have disappeared,dwarfing the civilian death toll in Afghanistan and Iraq over that period.   The majority of those killed and disappeared were victims of criminal organizations, but human rights organizations also report soaring rates of human rights violations, including torture and killing, committed by security forces.   The 2016 Global Peace Index, prepared by the Institute for Economics and Peace, estimates the total cost of violence in Mexico at $273 billion, or 14 percent of GDP, with no end in sight. Direct fiscal costs of fighting the war on crime were about $32 billion in 2015 alone. Yet the United States has contributed only about $2.5 billion since fiscal 2008 to Mexico’s drug war, under the so-called “Merida Initiative.” Mexico’s pain shows no signs of easing. The New York Times reported in December that Mexico suffered more than 17,000 homicides in the first 10 months of last year, the highest total since 2012. “The relapse in security has unnerved Mexico and led many to wonder whether the country is on the brink of a bloody, all-out war between criminal groups,” it said.    
    •   But In Del's defense, he only does this on things he would like to stay as is. When you are talking about legislation he is in favor of then it is the law of the land and can't be changed. When it is something that he dislikes, it can and should be changed.
  • Our Sponsors