Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
panthrcat

ruffed grouse take 2

15 posts in this topic

I think I have a post here on partridge or ruffed grouse, so figured I'd label this one as #2.

I went out yesterday and got a few cool pics of some birds.

here's a few:

IMG_0562copy.jpg

IMG_0565copy.jpg

IMG_0573copy.jpg

IMG_0764copy.jpg

IMG_0789copy.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I love these. I had to look at what you were using for settings, because for the apparent light, you certainly got the clarity and detail. Even catch lights. Do you generally use spot metering, or was that chosen specifically for this series?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I love these. I had to look at what you were using for settings, because for the apparent light, you certainly got the clarity and detail. Even catch lights. Do you generally use spot metering, or was that chosen specifically for this series?

I generally use spot metering,, I thought that was the best for the type of pics I take,, no? could you enlighten me a bit on which is better to use under which circumstances?

thank you for the comment

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Beautiful brown eyes on these birds, which is something a person doesn't normally realize until they see a good close up photo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I generally use spot metering,, I thought that was the best for the type of pics I take,, no? could you enlighten me a bit on which is better to use under which circumstances?

thank you for the comment

I was asking because I am always looking for advice. These exposures looked as if they would be really tough, but I like the results. I tend to like things a little darker, a little more shadowy. However, that makes it really difficult to get enough shutter speed for clarity and detail. I thought you were using some really creative settings for the situation. The 200 ISO surprised me. I have only tried spot metering once without much success, but when I read about it, it seemed to make sense for the situation. Maybe the experts can fill us in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice work in very tough lighting conditions, Sue. Hard to get pretty images with detail in the shadows when the subject is shaded and the background is sunlit. You did well.

FYI, I generally don't use spot metering in contrasty situations because it's too easy to put the focus point on a spot that gives you a wrong exposure.

Example: You're shooting a Canada goose at close range, and your focus point on spot metering is on its white cheek. Then the whole image gets exposed based on that white cheek. And remember, the meter wants to expose for mid-range values, so it's going to UNDEREXPOSE the white cheek to the point where it looks more gray. That means you'll have to brighten the whole image in post processing, which is no trouble in itself. But, ooops, there comes all that digital noise in the underexposed shadow areas when you brighten the image.

There are times spot metering works quite well. But with my style of shooting when I'm out and about bombing around in the vehicle or walking trails or bushwacking, you never know what you're going to find, so I most always leave it on evaluative metering, which takes in the exposure values of the whole scene and works out the best exposure based on the scene. It has its limitations, as does any metering system, but I've found it the best for what I want to do most of the time.

When I need to make exposure adjustments on the fly I generally just use exposure compensation, which is much faster than fooling with a metering system adjustment.

For static situations or when light is very consistent, I'll use manual exposure mode, which for a variety of reasons can give you clear advantages. Situations like that include studio work, macro work such as flowers, and outdoors when the lighting is even.

A bit about manual settings outdoors on nature subjects. This works poorly on partly cloudy days or other days when the light comes in and out, but on days when it's uniformly sunny or fully cloudy, it can be excellent.

Let's take birds-in-flight as an example in these conditions. I use evaluative metering first, taking a test shot of a bird. Then I check my histogram to see if the bird itself is exposed properly. If it is, I switch the dial to manual and duplicate the shutter speed and aperture settings and I'm good to go as long as the light stays pretty consistent. If the histo shows I've under- or over-exposed the bird, I'll adjust using EC until I get it right, then I'll adopt those settings on manual.

Here's why manual can be so great in situations like BIF and some others. Once you've got exposure dialed in on the subject itself, every frame, no matter what background the bird flies in front of, will produce a properly exposed bird. If you allow the automatic metering to do the job (any of the metering modes), your exposures will vary based on the background through which the bird flies, and that mean a badly exposed (sometimes blown out, sometimes underexposed) bird on some frames. Usually seems to happen JUST when the bird is at its best pose, too. Even with spot metering and center-weighted metering this happens to some degree, but not on manual settings. It works equally well on any subject in consistent light that moving around a lot, whether it's sports, outdoor weddings, parades, etc.

It takes some getting used to, for sure, and an underlying message that's just as important is to get familiar enough with your camera body and settings (and to develop the discipline to remember what your settings are) that you can make adjustments and readjustments easily. And then it's also important to return your camera to whatever settings you normally use for bombing around.

If I'm on manual settings and iso100, with a shutter speed of 3 sec and an aperture of f22 with mirror lock-up enabled and a remote shutter release mounted (like for macro flower work), after I'm finished but before I start walking down the trail I'll return settings to iso400, wide open aperture and Av mode, pull off the remote release and disable mirror lock-up, because I'd hate to have a wolf jump into the trail in front of me with my camera still locked on the macro settings. It might be a hassle to re-set the camera farther down the trail when I find another macro subject for my attention, but that's just part of the way photography works.

Sorry if that was a bit long and rambling.

Also, as always, this represents my experience and my photographic philosophy. Your results may vary, and as we continually find, there are often a number of different ways to accomplish the same effect.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's take birds-in-flight as an example in these conditions. I use evaluative metering first, taking a test shot of a bird. Then I check my histogram to see if the bird itself is exposed properly. If it is, I switch the dial to manual and duplicate the shutter speed and aperture settings and I'm good to go as long as the light stays pretty consistent. If the histo shows I've under- or over-exposed the bird, I'll adjust using EC until I get it right, then I'll adopt those settings on manual.

But, what if a bird comes flying by behind you? wink

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. Once again that was very helpful. I am not a bif shooter. I have enough problems when they sit still on a branch, but I did get some pifs (pelicans)yesterday with some success for the first time. Make the bird big enough and the day windy enough, I guess. But I did experience exactly what you describe with changing backgrounds. Your method would have worked well in the situation. Fortunately, there is one that I moved my exposure compensation in exactly the wrong direction over water, so when he flew up in front of trees, he came out about right. Happy accident. Good reminder on the resetting to your normal settings when finished. Aarrrgh! When I have forgotten, it usually does not result in a happy accident. Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Huh? confused

If you set your camera to manual on a uniformly suuny day, the exposure will be completely different if the sun is behind you, vs. in front of you. In other words, you have the perfect manual exposure dialed in for a bird flying out front, but if a bird comes from behind you, and you turn around and shoot, the sun will now be in front of you. On manual, you would now be off by a at least 1 full stop. Then again, if you are shooting into the sun, you won't end up with that good of a photo ayway. smile

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Then again, if you are shooting into the sun, you won't end up with that good of a photo ayway. smile

Exactly. Unless I'm on a rare species or trying for backlit effects, or there's some compelling behavior going on, I never shoot birds in flight anymore unless the sun is at a good angle. Why take a photo I know I'm not going to like?

I think you'll find, however, that even if you are shooting a backlit bird, there almost always are some edges visible to the camera that have the sun on them, and if you expose for the shaded bird those highlights will be badly blown out. Of course, by exposing for those highlights you'll have a lot of noise in the shaded portions, but Noise Ninja or other noise reduction software was made for situations like that, and if I'm trying for backlighting I'm not interested in developing more shadow detail in the subject.

Just my way of looking at it. smile

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

nice pics like them grouse cool bird. like eatin them to

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice work on the red phase ruffy sue!

...and I like the portrait too!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Beautiful shots Sue!....Love the details and colors.....Last one is my favorite....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you folks are soooo good! thanks again for all the info and tips,, I like to print them and keep them on hand, I take this stuff with me on my night shifts and always do some studying and reading,, then I get to try new things on my days off!

thanks all!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • And we know you like it raw.  No vaseline.
    • AHH..... Memories.... I would have loved to have a odometer on our  Tri-Moto 125, had to have put thousands of miles on that 3 wheeler, burnt it down a few times when we were kids but Dad said you'll have to learn to fix it yourself! I'm not bringing it back to the dealer every time there's something wrong! We got good at new pistons and rings and gasket sets..... eventually we brought it to the dealer in pieces after we couldn't fix it anymore, think it was a rod bearing that eventually was it's demise, ended up getting a rippin' Tri-Moto 175 after that, those wheelers were our main transportation since we didn't have drivers licenses yet....... good times for sure.   You're carb is having issues, I would go there first, somethings not stopping the fuel from getting into your carb, either the float has a hole in it and isn't floating, or it could be sticking somewhere or your needle and seat are shot.   Give the carb a good once over and you should have your problem fixed.   Those were pretty basic 2 cycle engines, I don't think they even had reed valves.   Mike    
    • I planned on getting seeds and starting them at home, I won't be up there until late April. I have planted squash up there and they did not grow, I will look at blue hubbard, I have not had/grown them before, they sound interesting.
    • Tomatoes, peppers and most other veggies can be easily grown in containers. This allows you to get your plants from the greenhouse and pot them up a week or two earlier if you have a sheltered spot for them.   Veggies can be mixed with ornamental plants in your containers and you can create some really cool landscaping. I have a ton of antique containers that I've integrated into my landscaping and they usually turn out great.
    • Probably.    What are you out if they don't grow?   Just use seeds.   No need to buy plants.   A couple bucks will get enough seeds to plant quite a few hills (plant several seeds in a group).   Or plant butternut squash and you get to eat some too.    Or Blue Hubbard...  
    •   Yes, definitely fence it if you are able. We have a large garden that we don't fence do to the size. Each year the deer do some damage but the worst is raccoons. We don't have many of them but they came through 2 years ago and destroyed our sweet corn crop. We had 4 rows, each over 50' long all gone in one night. It looked like they had a party with corn husks laying in piles all over the yard and corn cobs stripped clean everywhere. It was actually kind of comical to me but my wife was not pleased. 
    • Second the swim jig, comes through any cover nice, and if they aren't hitting the frog they will the swim jig
    • I would like to grow some pumpkins this year in the field on my hunting land in Wadena county. The ground is mostly sand. Can I dig a few holes, fill them with black dirt/compost and plant the plants in these, will they grow ok? Any advice will be appreciated.
    •   Yeah, yeah we know your the real Meat expert!  Vaseline.  
    • Never had dog.   Raw beef is tasty.  Rare steak,  carpaccio, steak tartare, Wisconsin cannibal sandwiches.     http://articles.latimes.com/2013/dec/06/news/la-ol-cannibal-sandwich-wisconsin-illness-20131206   'War on Christmas' expands to 'war on cannibal sandwich' in Wisconsin December 06, 2013|By Paul Whitefield   Forget the war on Christmas; now the nanny statists have taken aim at another storied holiday tradition (at least if you live in Wisconsin): cannibalism. OK, wait, that’s not quite accurate (though it is a heck of lede). It’s actually the “cannibal sandwich” that has caught the all-seeing eye of Big Government — and it doesn’t like what it’s seeing. First, some background, for those folks who live in normal places and eat normal food — or those who are having visions of the wood-chipper scene in “Fargo” (which wasn’t even set in Wisconsin, by the way, for you geographically challenged Californians).   It seems that the “cannibal sandwich” is a popular item in areas of the upper Midwest, and especially in Wisconsin. According to the Associated Press: “The appetizer, also called ‘tiger meat,’ ‘steak tartare’ or simply ‘ground beef,’ is usually a simple dish of lean ground meat seasoned with salt and pepper on rye cocktail bread with sliced raw onion.” The AP gleaned this tidbit from one John Gurda, a “Milwaukee historian … who served it at his 1977 wedding reception” (which must’ve been one of the highlights of the season that year in Milwaukee). Oh, yes, and in case you were planning on making this at home: “Occasionally, a raw egg will be mixed with the meat.” Or, I suppose, you could throw caution completely to the winds and slap on a raw oyster or two. But it’s yummy, at least to Wisconsinites. As Keith Meyer, who runs a butcher shop in Kenosha, explained to the AP: “It’s like eating a cold hamburger that’s a little on the raw side.” Or, I’d say, it’s exactly like eating a cold hamburger that is in fact raw — then again, I’ve never had one, so what would I know? Anyway, as I started to say when I began this rant, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (a.k.a. one of the nanny staters) doesn’t have the same, ahem, respect for tradition as the common cheeseheads, and it issued a warning this week about the Wisconsin fare. Seems it had found 50 cases of food-borne illness in 1972, 1978 and 1994 in the state, and in the 2012 holiday season, it linked at least four and possibly more than a dozen cases of E. Coli to the consumption of “cannibal sandwiches” in central Wisconsin. To which I say: Only 50? Only four? Heck, more people get sick eating bad cantaloupes and spinach. You’re going to deprive the good people of the upper Midwest a cherished holiday party platter because a few folks got really sick? No, I say! Rather, “Don’t tread on my bread!” Or, “You can have my cold raw hamburger sandwich when you pry it from my cold dead fingers.” I say, “If it was good enough for Grandpa Ollie, it’s good enough for (anyone silly enough to eat it)!” Or, at the very least, just give it a better name. After all, in California, we pay big bucks to eat sushi — raw fish. So maybe the Wisconsin folks should call their concoction a “sashi sandwich.” Who knows, it might be the next big thing on the Left Coast.
  • Our Sponsors