Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
JordanL

Depth finder not getting depth.

6 posts in this topic

I got a new fiberglass boat last year. The transducer for the lowrance is shoot thru hull. At cruising speed it will not register depth. Just wondering if my only option is to put one on the back. I took it to the dealer a couple of times and they were no help. Thanks, Jordan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You might have a bad bond to the bottom of your boat. One trick to test the transducer is to have enough water in your bilge to make sure your transducer is submerged, then try it and see what happens. If it works that means the mounting is bad, if you can pop it out and remount it you should be good to go.

Another possibility is if the transducer is mounted too far forward, that part of the hull might not be in good contact with the water at cruising speed??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't for get the software issues, I had a shoot through the hull, and it worked fine in deeper water, but not in shallow water.

This sounds like a different situation, so I would do what perch posted first.

Does it matter what depth, what unit? where is it mounted? Does it work when you are not underway?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yea it works fine when going really slow or still. Its a lowrance 510. I think its mounted in a good spot, Really close to the back. The dealer said that they remounted it but i am not to sure of that. I am going out this weekend and will take a little better look at it. I really dont want to have to mount a new one on the back but if thats what it takes then i guess i will. Thanks for the input.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You should be able to shoot through the hull, tons of guys do it. Try the water in the bilge test to see what that does for you. Good luck with it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What hull style do you have? Do you have a modified tunnel hull with an inset below your sump where the ducer is installed? If so...that might be an issue...as at high speed it will produce cavitation in that area and cause the in-hull to malfunction due to air bubble turbulence below the ducer. If this is the case you may need to do a transom mount to get ideal hi-speed performance no matter what.

What type of ducer did they use to shoot through the hull to start with? Did they use a Hi-Speed and epoxy it in (a Bad plan as they can easily get off center in installation), or did they use a ducer designed for the install?

The installation may have been poor, or the original ducer may be bad from the get-go...or as was previously stated, it may be a Lowrance software issue.

Do the wet test with a puck ducer submerged in the sump with a bag of sang holding it in place firmly.... and then see if the unit reads properly at all speeds. Try several positions in the sump to see if it reads better in a different location, and note it when and if it does.

You may be able to re-set the original ducer and see if the epoxy or placement was the culprit in the original installation reading poorly?

If you re-epoxy a new ducer in..DO NOT TURN the unit on for at least 12 hours after installation, as this can cause the epoxy to develop pockets that will diminish the acoustic conductivity and ruin the installation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Talked to one of their guys at the Ice Show last week,  what I believe was their entry level w/ramp (like 6.5' x 12') door was over $13k.   I thought it was quite pricey with really not much for any options.  Quality appeared to be good but way more then I would spend for it.  Their biggest selling point is the light weight and pounds per square inch on the ice.   They do have  channels on the inside to run you wired through if you want to add items.   The inside was extremely bright - almost to bright for my eyes.   I believe they said they are located in Litchfield, MN.
    • I would give your first statement 5 Pinnochios.  The first tax increase on people making less than $200k he signed was only 16 days into his first term.     "1. A 156 percent increase in the federal excise tax on tobacco: On February 4, 2009, just sixteen days into his Administration, Obama signed into law a 156 percent increase in the federal excise tax on tobacco, a hike of 61 cents per pack. The median income of smokers is just over $36,000 per year."       And then, of course, the big one is Obamacare, which was ruled a tax by the Supreme Court, and affects many taxpayers under $200,000.
    • Trump is way ahead of you there buddy.    
    • The only tax change that occurred was allowing the Bush tax cuts to expire. All tax bills must be introduced in the House of Representatives, so if you are unhappy with the current state of taxes, you should start there.   Also for those wondering, Clinton's tax increases would have added about $140 billion per year in tax revenue.
    • Sooooo....we were at a breaking point before Obama care....anyone actually think their policy under Trumpcare is going to reduce costs with an increase in benefits.....over an extended period of time?
    • The Art of the Deal......
    • So in a nutshell, you wouldn't really recommend buying U.S. Treasury bonds for an investment.
    • I'm not sure on how much foam it took.  It has over 2" on the bottom.  What happens with the cold surface is you have to "flash" the surface with foam then go over it again, it uses more chemical to do the same job.  So the price to do a cold house is more.  The foam comes out hot & creates more heat during the chemical reaction.     The froth paks were more expensive than having it done in my case.
  • Our Sponsors