Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Stickjiggler

Liquid or granular weed-n-feed?

7 posts in this topic

What works better. I've never used a liquid before but am considering giving it a try this year. Any tips or recomendations of what to use. 15,000 sq.ft. grass in good shape with minimal weeds but a lot of quack.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've use both liquid and granular. I like both but I think the liquid seams to work a little faster. Most of the time I just buy what on sale.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Most likely, neither product you're going to buy is not going to be labeled for control of Quackgrass.

So far the only one that I know of is a Monsanto product called Certainty. However, unless you have a very calibrated sprayer, you're probably going to have a yard that looks like you sprayed roundup on it. These are just the reports that I've seen on different lawn application websites.

As for the liquid vs granular application, I personally believe the liquid will be the way to go.

With a granular application, you need to do it either early morning when the dew is still on the ground, or right after a rain shower. If you have an irrigation system, then run the system and then do an application as well.

Granular works by having the granuals stick to the leaves of the plant.

With a liquid application, you don't have to worry about the leaf being wet, since you're applying the water.

With either, you want to do the application when it will be dry for 24 hours AFTER the application, which means if you do have an irrigation system that runs every day, make sure it's shut off for a day, or two.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as weed control there is no comparison between liquid and granular. Soaking a weed with a liquid chemical will obviously be far more effective than a few granuals sticking to the plant. Both fertilizers can be very effective with a liquid working much faster but not lasting as long as a slow release granular. The perfect program for me is a liquid in the spring with weed control and pre-emergent to "jolt" the lawn and get it growing and green while killing all the weeds. Summer I do a granular fert. because of the heat. Early fall another shot of liquid fert. and weed control. Late fall granular fertilizer. This program will keep your lawn green and virtually weed free all year maybe having to spot treat a few weeds in between. As for the quack grass as stated above you probably won't get rid of it unless you spray it with round-up and then seed or just get it to blend in as best you can and deal with it, thats what I do..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I gave up on trying to treat the quack grass & ended up just kicking it out. I was tired of dealing with it. That stuff is nasty.

I use granular 3x per year. 1 - pre-emergent after first mowing. 2 - weed & feed 30 days after first application. 3 - winterizer in Sept / Oct. In between, when weeds are active, I spray weed b gone. Some years I do this 2x. It's the mix as you go type in the bottle you hook up to the hose.

I am by no means an expert, but I do have a nice lawn by following this.

Good luck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the tips all. What kind and where do I buy the liquid weed and feed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wish I could help you there but since I get all my stuff from our company I'm not very familier with non-commercial products.......You may want to consider having a smaller local company treat your lawn for you. It may not be that much more expensive than doing it yourself and from what I have seen over the years it is much more effective. Also less for you to worry about. If you ever do go that route just make sure they gaurantee their service.......Sorry if the sales man is comming out of me there!! smile

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Good luck Anyfish2. Saw quite a few out in the rain driving home today    
    • Well, i will try my hand at picking up another bird for the team starting tomorrow.  Weather looks to be challenging at best over the next 7 days.  I will give my best effort when i can get out.   Birds are still hanging around the area well,  hopefully i can get a tom to break from the Hens.  
    • and this?   
    • Sure seems like a nice little bait. Takes the topwater frog to a whole new level.
    • They talked today about the D inability to find shooting lanes....I like Reilly's ability to walk the blueline with the puck and shoot quickly...maybe he could help...but he is not physical by any means... BB stated he wants a big physical Dman for starters.
    •   Good stuff...the main diff between Chicago and Mn was the way the Bowman took ownwership of the problem and Fletch did as expected today and blamed a hot goaltender, danced around pointed questions...he did however admit we are in a tough position with the Cap and few draft choices but steered clear of ownership to that problem....did you listen in by chance...it was almost laughable
    • BB, I cant say I disagree with any of those observations. They didn't produce when it counts. That is what really matters, but it isn't the first time that teams excel in the regular season and flop come playoff time and it certainly isn't something that is isolated to the Wild. The Hawks get some slack because they have won 3 cups in the last 7 years, but fact is they have been bounced in the last 2 1st rounds too. By that, they are no better than us. We will see what happens to the Caps. They have a tough draw with the Pens this round, but its not a stretch to say they will get bounced 2 years in a row and be the Presidents Cup winner. Lots of teams have that issue. Anaheim has had that tendency too. Playoffs are a whole different animal. The team makeup that works in the regular season usually doesn't translate well in the playoffs. I agree the Wild need more beef. Staal certainly helped, but they are far from a heavy team especially on the back end with our D. Early on I thought we had one of the deepest D corps in the league. Looking at them in this playoff series they looked weak. We needed a guy like Folin to step in and play some minutes and make a difference, but he was shell-shocked in his first playoff game. I don't think we have much help in that area in Iowa either. The heaviest guy we have Seeler, is a liability big time and I don't know if he will ever make it up to the big club.
    • You can pre-order on a Japanese web site ... i almost did but got spooked out with all the Japanese language and had no idea how to translate and know what shipping and price was LOL     i want one but will wait!!!  so many lures and not enough time
  • Our Sponsors