Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
mnhunter 3815

NASCAR may implement harsher penalties for blocking and aggressive dri

18 posts in this topic

whats next??? racing is racing if you cant block or be a little aggressive why bother racing??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whats wrong with a clean race with a skilled driver and a well set up car winning?

I see no need for blocking and rough driving.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If Edwards didn't go airborn, which caused spectator injuries, this wouldn't be an issue.

As much as I can't stand Kenny Wallace, I had to agree with what he said yesterday - spinning someone out of the way to win a race isn't bad. Spinning them out and sending them airborn is bad. The speed has become an issue again, just like it did in 1987 when Bobby Allison had the same type of accident.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whats wrong with a clean race with a skilled driver and a well set up car winning?

Because that ain't NASCAR. Drivers banging into each other with these full-body cars and tempers flying are why people are drawn to it and always have been. If you want drivers who raise their pinky when drinking bottled water from the Alps and gentlemen racing then there is F1 and other open wheel series that need fans.

They've already screwed up this sport enough with their knee-jerk reactions and the decreasing popularity is a result of that. If NASCAR keeps making these reactive decisions they're going to need fans too pretty soon. Quit messing with a successful formula that has worked for decades. Change isn't always for the better!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would simply like to see a clean race and who is the best at racing and not who is the biggest hack. Anyone can hack their way around a track. Tempers and banging has never drawn me to the sport but the hacks and cheap shots could chase me away.

I will never understand the thinking that a driver that pounds his way around a track makes for a good race. That does not take much for skills at all.

I have been approached by many fans who say they enjoy it when we go racing and win a race and he never hits one car yet passes them all. Now thats a race.

If I wanted to see a demo derby, I would attend the county fair.

Don't now anyhting about pinkies and such.

Nascar will be just fine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just curious here does anyone think Brad Keselowski's last lap reaction or lack of reaction (keeping his foot on the gas) was wrong?

Also can one really expect even the best set up cars to perform perfectly while running in a pack of cars all doing 200 plus mph? I mean C'mon the cars are going to wiggle and move around with the tremendous amount of aero that occur's in a pack like that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When the late great Dale Earnhardt crashed a guy out of the race everyone cheered. No rule changes then. If jr. crashed someone out of a race to win there wouldn't be an issue either. Want to watch good clean racing tune in to Moto Gp or Ama Superbike. Much better racing there anyways. Nasscar is a joke anyway. Don't want everyone packed up on superspeedways? Easy solution, take off the plates and see who can drive at 230mph. The plate races definately do not reward talent in any way, nor do the new cars they use.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kinda funny that anyone would mention aggressive driving/stiffer penalties, going into Richmond.

Should the rules be different at higher speeds? Taking someone out at Martinsville is alot different than say Michigan!!

Is it aggressive driving when you push a guy around the track like Talladega?? Or just cut him off at the finish line?

Nascar doesn't need to change a thing. My gosh look at that race Sunday. It was a tribute to all the new safety implemented since Dale's terrible crash. The COT is a tank. Newmans car withstood an incredible impact. The fence did it's job keeping the 99 on the track. The Hans defices allowed all the drivers to walk away. Heck even Edwards sprinted to the finish line. And ask Robbie Gordon about the safer barriers on the infield walls!!

It just really burned my butt that Carl Edwards was quoted as saying that "Nascar is gonna let this happen til someone gets killed." Are you kidding me? Let what happen? Idiots like you trying to cut someone off at 190 mph?? Edwards walked away from that crash because of changes made by NASCAR following tragedy.

The only change Nascar needs to make is to teach some of it's drivers how to RESPECT each other. People will get killed only if the drivers lose respect for life!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: harvey lee
Whats wrong with a clean race with a skilled driver and a well set up car winning?

Because that ain't NASCAR. Drivers banging into each other with these full-body cars and tempers flying are why people are drawn to it and always have been. If you want drivers who raise their pinky when drinking bottled water from the Alps and gentlemen racing then there is F1 and other open wheel series that need fans.

They've already screwed up this sport enough with their knee-jerk reactions and the decreasing popularity is a result of that. If NASCAR keeps making these reactive decisions they're going to need fans too pretty soon. Quit messing with a successful formula that has worked for decades. Change isn't always for the better!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like I am the only one who enjoys a good clean race to really see who is the best.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: LMITOUT
Originally Posted By: harvey lee
Whats wrong with a clean race with a skilled driver and a well set up car winning?

Because that ain't NASCAR. Drivers banging into each other with these full-body cars and tempers flying are why people are drawn to it and always have been. If you want drivers who raise their pinky when drinking bottled water from the Alps and gentlemen racing then there is F1 and other open wheel series that need fans.

They've already screwed up this sport enough with their knee-jerk reactions and the decreasing popularity is a result of that. If NASCAR keeps making these reactive decisions they're going to need fans too pretty soon. Quit messing with a successful formula that has worked for decades. Change isn't always for the better!

Originally Posted By: CPRJoe
Kinda funny that anyone would mention aggressive driving/stiffer penalties, going into Richmond.

Should the rules be different at higher speeds? Taking someone out at Martinsville is alot different than say Michigan!!

Is it aggressive driving when you push a guy around the track like Talladega?? Or just cut him off at the finish line?

Nascar doesn't need to change a thing. My gosh look at that race Sunday. It was a tribute to all the new safety implemented since Dale's terrible crash. The COT is a tank. Newmans car withstood an incredible impact. The fence did it's job keeping the 99 on the track. The Hans defices allowed all the drivers to walk away. Heck even Edwards sprinted to the finish line. And ask Robbie Gordon about the safer barriers on the infield walls!!

It just really burned my butt that Carl Edwards was quoted as saying that "Nascar is gonna let this happen til someone gets killed." Are you kidding me? Let what happen? Idiots like you trying to cut someone off at 190 mph?? Edwards walked away from that crash because of changes made by NASCAR following tragedy.

2 excellent posts

3 excellent posts grin

put me in the enough changes camp. I dont like open wheel stuff where girls run without breaking a nail. Clear out the bottom rows of seats, put up a stronger fence, and as Dale sr said take off the damm plates and go race shocked

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like I am the only one who enjoys a good clean race to really see who is the best.

A good clean race is fine, but what you are asking for is not neccessarily the best driver, you are looking for the fastest, best handling car and that isn't what Nascar was built on.

The best driver IMO is someone who can take a mediocre car and bring it to the checkered flag by using the draft, forcing people out of the way (Notice I didn't say wreck them, but sometimes it unintentionally happens), pit strategy, teaming up with other drivers, and luck in avoiding the wrecks.

The races I find incredibly boring are when your so called 'best driver' gets to the front at lap 10 and stays there the entire race. He didn't have to force himself into that position, he just got there and stayed there, did he earn it? In my mind, no, he just had the best car at the beginning of the race and nobody was able to catch him...YAWN...thats not the driver, thats the car.

I hated seeing what happened to Carl this weekend just as much as you, but face it that was racing, Keselowski had a run, he went low, held his line and Carl came down trying to block him. BK never intentionally tried spinning him, Carl did it to himself. The only way for BK to have avoided that wreck would be to either drop below the yellow line and risk DQ or hit the brakes and fall 15 spots and risk getting rear ended and spun by a much faster car from behind.

Let me make this clear, I don't watch Nascar for the wrecks, I watch it because I like the strategy part of it, I like the addrenaline rush of watching 3 wide in the corner at 200mph, I like trying to figure out whats going to happen next based on the drivers personality and driving style, and soooo much more!!

If you start penalizing the drivers for blocking and aggressive driving where is the limit? "Oh no!! Kyle Busch swerved too fast to go around Stewart....$25,000", "Newman wouldn't let Jr pass him....$45,000".....wave goodbye to Nascar say hello to the soccer mom who complains because the other kids are playing 'too rough'.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with you harvey, but I am a firm believer that nascar has created the problem. Every single car (body) in the field is dang near identical, oh ya all the shocks-tires-springs-etc.are all the same also. To me the only difference is the manufactures engine and that is closely regulated by nascar. If Carl had the best car in the field he wouldn't of had to go down than up to block the car behind him. JMO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

EXCELLENT POST! My thoughts exactly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh no, I do agree with you Harvey. That would be the perfect race. It's just that with the way NASCAR has these rules set with the COT and the limitations teams have on adjustments, it seems as though the races are incredibly boring or overly exciting due to the bumping and banging. So, what you end up with is races where it is very difficult to pass and you play follow the leader, or if you want to make a pass you have to get physical and use your bumper a bit. Do I like it? No. However, it's a self imposed problem brought on by NASCAR itself. I do not like the fact that they are putting the drivers / teams in this small box with which to work. We have discussed it at great length on this forum before with the changes we felt NASCAR could make to make it better. I am just very frustrated and disappointed that the people that are the NASCAR rules makers are really simple idiots at times.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • The wife and I went on Sunday also. Like Rundrave, a lot of the lodge booths didn't really appeal to me but we talked to quite a few dog people there, maybe learned a few things. Funny how two people that would have nothing in common can talk like old friends for 20 minutes about a dog.Realized that a lot of the game farms are WAY more expensive than the one I'm a member at.  Over all I would say it was worth it.
    •     I think we would be better served by not being suspicious of religions themselves, but by being suspicious of rulers and oppressors who use religion as a tool to serve their purposes.     How Gandhi put it:   I had practiced Hinduism from early childhood. My nurse had taught me to invoke Rama when I feared evil spirits. Later on, I had come in contact with Christians, Muslims and others, and after making a fair study of other religions, had stuck to Hinduism. I am as firm in my faith today as in my early childhood. I believe god would make me an instrument of saving the religion that I love, cherish and practice. In any case, one has to have constant practice and acquaintance with the fundamentals of religion before being qualified for becoming god's instrument. It has been whispered that by being so much with Musalman friends I make myself unfit to know the Hindu mind. The Hindu mind is myself. Surely I do not need to live amidst Hindus to know the Hindu mind when every fiber of my being is Hindu. My Hinduism must be a very poor thing if it cannot flourish under influences of the most adverse. I know instinctively what is necessary for Hinduism. As my instinct is wholly Hindu, I know that what I am about to say will be acceptable to the vast mass of the Hindus. My Hinduism is not sectarian. It includes all that I know to be best in Islam,Christianity, Buddhism and Zoroastrianism. I approach politics, as everything else, in a religious spirit. Truth is my religion and ahimsa is the only way of its realization. I have rejected once and for all the doctrine of the sword. My position is and has been clear. I am proud of being a Hindu, but I have never gone to anybody as a Hindu to secure Hindu-Muslim unity. My Hinduism demands no pacts. I am no politician in the accepted sense. It is because I am sanatani (orthodox) Hindu that I claim to be a Christian, a Buddhist and a Muslim. Some Muslim friends also feel that I have no right to read Arabic verses from the Koran, but such (people) do not know that true religion transcends language and scripture. I do not see any reason why I should not read the Kalma, why I should not praise Allah and why I should not acclaim Muhammad as his prophet. I believe in all the great prophets and saints of every religion. I shall continue to ask god to give me strength not to be angry with my accusers, but to be prepared even to die at their hands without wishing them ill. I claim that Hinduism is all-inclusive and I am sure that if I live up to my convictions, I shall have served not only Hinduism but Islam also. There is mention of terrible punishments in the Bhagavatam, the Manu Smriti and the Vedas. Yet the central teaching of the Hindu religion is that mercy of kindness is the essence of all religion. I want you to bear in mind what Tulsidas has said: "Good and bad, all men are the creation of god. The man of god picks up the good and discards the bad like the proverbial swan which is able to drink the milk and leave behind water, when a mixture of water and milk is placed before it." I am proud to belong to that Hinduism which is all inclusive and which stands for tolerance. Aryan scholars swore by what they called the Vedic religion and Hindustan is otherwise known as 'Aryavarta.' I have no such aspiration. The Hindustan of my conception is all-sufficing for me. It certainly includes the Vedas, but it includes also much more. I can detect no inconsistency in declaring that I can, without in any way whatsoever impairing the dignity of Hinduism, pay equal homage to the best of Islam, Christianity, Zoroastrianism and Judaism. Such Hinduism will live as long as the sun shines. Tulsidas has summed it up in one doha (couplet): "The root of religion is embedded in mercy, whereas egotism is rooted in love of the body." Tulsi says that mercy should never be abandoned, even though the body perishes. Hinduism is not an exclusive religion. In it there is room for the worship of all prophets in the world. It is not a missionary religion in the ordinary sense of the term. It has no doubt absorbed many tribes in its fold, but this absorption has been an evolutionary, imperceptible character. Hinduism tells everyone to worship god according to his own faith or dharma and so it lives at peace with all religions. Though I call myself a sanatani Hindu, I am proud of the fact that the late Imam Saheb of South Africa accompanied me to India on his return and died in the Sabarmati ashram. His daughter and son-in-law are still at Sabarmati. Am I to throw them overboard? My Hinduism teaches me to respect all religions. In this lies the secret of Rama Raj. The die is cast for me. The common factor of all religions is non-violence. Some inculcate more of it than others; all agree that you can never have too much of it. We must be sure, however, that it is non-violence and not a cloak for cowardice. Hinduism with its message of ahimsa is to me the most glorious religion in the world -- as my wife to me is the most beautiful woman in the world -- but others may feel the same about their own religion. Religion is outraged when an outrage is perpetrated in its name. Almost all the riots in the unhappy land take place in the name of religion, though they might have a political motive behind them. There is no room for goondaismin any religion worth the name, be it Islam, Hinduism or any other. If religion dies, then India dies. Today, the Hindus and the Muslims are clinging to the husk of religion. They have gone mad. But I hope that all this is froth, that all this scum has come to the surface, as happens when the waters of two rivers meet. Everything appears muddy on top and underneath is crystal clear and calm. The scum goes to the sea of itself, and the rivers mingle and flow clear and pure.          
    •   thanks all for the replies - how does this Aqua Vu HD 700i display show up outside?  So from the replies I'm sure I narrowed my search down for either the Marcum VS825SD or Aqua Vu HD 700i.  Not just have to see if I can find some year end ice specials.
    • Add some Liptons Beefy Onion soup mix to your burger. Adds a great taste.
    •     Must be Milwaukee or Ryobi because DeWalt already has 6amh batteries and they do make car chargers as well.
    • "They" As in Milwaukee?
    • During the past century we were also concerned with Germany, Japan, Korea and Vietnam. You blaming them too?
    • The MN DNR Eagle Cam pair already has three eggs and is over half way done incubating them. http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/features/webcams/eaglecam/index.html
    • Google;   Sayyid Qutb  and you can then read and decide on your own where and how todays Islamic Fundamentalists originated. 
    • Also check out discount ramps dot com
  • Our Sponsors